‘Legislating for economic development: Irish fisheries as a case study in the limitations of ‘Improvement’

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the limits of the culture of improvement in eighteenth-century Ireland, through the first case study of Irish fishery legislation. It suggests that the many laws and bills dedicated to 'improving' the Irish fishing industry were in fact protectionist and self-serving in orientation, up until at least the very late eighteenth-century. It also argues that the backers of this legislation used the cult that had built up around the idea of improvement in order to lend their schemes moral legitimacy, which they were able to do because it was by its very nature a protean concept.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689-1800
EditorsDavid Hayton, James Kelly, John Bergin
Pages136-159
Publication statusPublished - 13 May 2010

Fingerprint

Economic Development
Legislation
Fisheries
Cult
Ireland
Legitimacy
Fishing Industry

Keywords

  • Irish Parliament
  • Legislation
  • Improvement
  • Economic development
  • eighteenth century
  • fisheries
  • fishing

Cite this

Sneddon, A. (2010). ‘Legislating for economic development: Irish fisheries as a case study in the limitations of ‘Improvement’. In D. Hayton, J. Kelly, & J. Bergin (Eds.), The Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689-1800 (pp. 136-159)
Sneddon, Andrew. / ‘Legislating for economic development: Irish fisheries as a case study in the limitations of ‘Improvement’. The Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689-1800. editor / David Hayton ; James Kelly ; John Bergin. 2010. pp. 136-159
@inbook{c34a264ef3f542ddb835f97bbf81f41d,
title = "‘Legislating for economic development: Irish fisheries as a case study in the limitations of ‘Improvement’",
abstract = "This article explores the limits of the culture of improvement in eighteenth-century Ireland, through the first case study of Irish fishery legislation. It suggests that the many laws and bills dedicated to 'improving' the Irish fishing industry were in fact protectionist and self-serving in orientation, up until at least the very late eighteenth-century. It also argues that the backers of this legislation used the cult that had built up around the idea of improvement in order to lend their schemes moral legitimacy, which they were able to do because it was by its very nature a protean concept.",
keywords = "Irish Parliament, Legislation, Improvement, Economic development, eighteenth century, fisheries, fishing",
author = "Andrew Sneddon",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
day = "13",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780230231597",
pages = "136--159",
editor = "David Hayton and James Kelly and John Bergin",
booktitle = "The Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689-1800",

}

Sneddon, A 2010, ‘Legislating for economic development: Irish fisheries as a case study in the limitations of ‘Improvement’. in D Hayton, J Kelly & J Bergin (eds), The Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689-1800. pp. 136-159.

‘Legislating for economic development: Irish fisheries as a case study in the limitations of ‘Improvement’. / Sneddon, Andrew.

The Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689-1800. ed. / David Hayton; James Kelly; John Bergin. 2010. p. 136-159.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - ‘Legislating for economic development: Irish fisheries as a case study in the limitations of ‘Improvement’

AU - Sneddon, Andrew

PY - 2010/5/13

Y1 - 2010/5/13

N2 - This article explores the limits of the culture of improvement in eighteenth-century Ireland, through the first case study of Irish fishery legislation. It suggests that the many laws and bills dedicated to 'improving' the Irish fishing industry were in fact protectionist and self-serving in orientation, up until at least the very late eighteenth-century. It also argues that the backers of this legislation used the cult that had built up around the idea of improvement in order to lend their schemes moral legitimacy, which they were able to do because it was by its very nature a protean concept.

AB - This article explores the limits of the culture of improvement in eighteenth-century Ireland, through the first case study of Irish fishery legislation. It suggests that the many laws and bills dedicated to 'improving' the Irish fishing industry were in fact protectionist and self-serving in orientation, up until at least the very late eighteenth-century. It also argues that the backers of this legislation used the cult that had built up around the idea of improvement in order to lend their schemes moral legitimacy, which they were able to do because it was by its very nature a protean concept.

KW - Irish Parliament

KW - Legislation

KW - Improvement

KW - Economic development

KW - eighteenth century

KW - fisheries

KW - fishing

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780230231597

SP - 136

EP - 159

BT - The Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689-1800

A2 - Hayton, David

A2 - Kelly, James

A2 - Bergin, John

ER -

Sneddon A. ‘Legislating for economic development: Irish fisheries as a case study in the limitations of ‘Improvement’. In Hayton D, Kelly J, Bergin J, editors, The Eighteenth-Century Composite State: Representative Institutions in Ireland and Europe, 1689-1800. 2010. p. 136-159