Lecturers’ views of assessment design, marking and feedback in higher education: a case for professionalisation?

Lin Norton, Sarah Floyd, Bill Norton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Research on professional assessment practice in higher education does not always take account of lecturers’ perceptions and experiences, or their disciplinary context. This questionnaire study was designed to explore lecturers’ views about three inter-related elements of professional assessment practice: assessment design, marking and feedback. It consisted of two questionnaires: the Assessment Design Inventory (ADI), previously published, and the Assessment, Marking and Feedback Inventory (AMFI) which was newly developed for this study. The two main purposes of the research were to: i) establish the validity of these two questionnaires as research tools, ii) explore the existence of professional practice in assessment and analyse any perceived hindrances as well as possible effects of participants’ subject discipline. 356 lecturers from two UK universities, with a range of teaching experience and representing soft and hard disciplines, took part. Results indicated that the ADI and the AMFI were robust instruments. Findings showed evidence of assessment professionalism, but also some areas where it was lacking, together with a perceived need for formal training. Participants recognised that there were certain hindrances in putting their pedagogical beliefs into practice. The implications of this study are discussed in terms of advancing the sector’s understanding of assessment professionalism.

    LanguageEnglish
    Pages1209-1221
    Number of pages13
    JournalAssessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
    Volume44
    Issue number8
    Early online date26 Mar 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Mar 2019

    Fingerprint

    professionalization
    university teacher
    education
    questionnaire
    experience
    university

    Keywords

    • Assessment questionnaires
    • assessment practice
    • assessment professionalism
    • lecturers’ perceptions
    • lecturers' perceptions

    Cite this

    @article{a1fb70f2c860439299fba8e3ebe32fcb,
    title = "Lecturers’ views of assessment design, marking and feedback in higher education: a case for professionalisation?",
    abstract = "Research on professional assessment practice in higher education does not always take account of lecturers’ perceptions and experiences, or their disciplinary context. This questionnaire study was designed to explore lecturers’ views about three inter-related elements of professional assessment practice: assessment design, marking and feedback. It consisted of two questionnaires: the Assessment Design Inventory (ADI), previously published, and the Assessment, Marking and Feedback Inventory (AMFI) which was newly developed for this study. The two main purposes of the research were to: i) establish the validity of these two questionnaires as research tools, ii) explore the existence of professional practice in assessment and analyse any perceived hindrances as well as possible effects of participants’ subject discipline. 356 lecturers from two UK universities, with a range of teaching experience and representing soft and hard disciplines, took part. Results indicated that the ADI and the AMFI were robust instruments. Findings showed evidence of assessment professionalism, but also some areas where it was lacking, together with a perceived need for formal training. Participants recognised that there were certain hindrances in putting their pedagogical beliefs into practice. The implications of this study are discussed in terms of advancing the sector’s understanding of assessment professionalism.",
    keywords = "Assessment questionnaires, assessment practice, assessment professionalism, lecturers’ perceptions, lecturers' perceptions",
    author = "Lin Norton and Sarah Floyd and Bill Norton",
    year = "2019",
    month = "3",
    day = "26",
    doi = "10.1080/02602938.2019.1592110",
    language = "English",
    volume = "44",
    pages = "1209--1221",
    journal = "Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education",
    issn = "0260-2938",
    number = "8",

    }

    Lecturers’ views of assessment design, marking and feedback in higher education: a case for professionalisation? / Norton, Lin; Floyd, Sarah; Norton, Bill.

    In: Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 44, No. 8, 17.11.2019, p. 1209-1221.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Lecturers’ views of assessment design, marking and feedback in higher education: a case for professionalisation?

    AU - Norton, Lin

    AU - Floyd, Sarah

    AU - Norton, Bill

    PY - 2019/3/26

    Y1 - 2019/3/26

    N2 - Research on professional assessment practice in higher education does not always take account of lecturers’ perceptions and experiences, or their disciplinary context. This questionnaire study was designed to explore lecturers’ views about three inter-related elements of professional assessment practice: assessment design, marking and feedback. It consisted of two questionnaires: the Assessment Design Inventory (ADI), previously published, and the Assessment, Marking and Feedback Inventory (AMFI) which was newly developed for this study. The two main purposes of the research were to: i) establish the validity of these two questionnaires as research tools, ii) explore the existence of professional practice in assessment and analyse any perceived hindrances as well as possible effects of participants’ subject discipline. 356 lecturers from two UK universities, with a range of teaching experience and representing soft and hard disciplines, took part. Results indicated that the ADI and the AMFI were robust instruments. Findings showed evidence of assessment professionalism, but also some areas where it was lacking, together with a perceived need for formal training. Participants recognised that there were certain hindrances in putting their pedagogical beliefs into practice. The implications of this study are discussed in terms of advancing the sector’s understanding of assessment professionalism.

    AB - Research on professional assessment practice in higher education does not always take account of lecturers’ perceptions and experiences, or their disciplinary context. This questionnaire study was designed to explore lecturers’ views about three inter-related elements of professional assessment practice: assessment design, marking and feedback. It consisted of two questionnaires: the Assessment Design Inventory (ADI), previously published, and the Assessment, Marking and Feedback Inventory (AMFI) which was newly developed for this study. The two main purposes of the research were to: i) establish the validity of these two questionnaires as research tools, ii) explore the existence of professional practice in assessment and analyse any perceived hindrances as well as possible effects of participants’ subject discipline. 356 lecturers from two UK universities, with a range of teaching experience and representing soft and hard disciplines, took part. Results indicated that the ADI and the AMFI were robust instruments. Findings showed evidence of assessment professionalism, but also some areas where it was lacking, together with a perceived need for formal training. Participants recognised that there were certain hindrances in putting their pedagogical beliefs into practice. The implications of this study are discussed in terms of advancing the sector’s understanding of assessment professionalism.

    KW - Assessment questionnaires

    KW - assessment practice

    KW - assessment professionalism

    KW - lecturers’ perceptions

    KW - lecturers' perceptions

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063529876&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/02602938.2019.1592110

    DO - 10.1080/02602938.2019.1592110

    M3 - Article

    VL - 44

    SP - 1209

    EP - 1221

    JO - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

    T2 - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

    JF - Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

    SN - 0260-2938

    IS - 8

    ER -