Learning from where ‘eye’ remotely look or point: impact on number line estimation error in adults.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


In this article, we present an investigation into the use of visual cues during number line estimation and their influence on cognitive processes for reducing number line estimation error. Participants completed a 0-1000 number line estimation task before and after a brief intervention in which they observed static-visual or dynamic-visual cues (control, anchor, gaze cursor, mouse cursor) and also made estimation marks to test effective number-target estimation. Results indicated that a significant pre-test to post-test reduction in estimation error was present for dynamic-visual cues of modelled eye-gaze and mouse cursor. However, there was no significant performance difference between pre- and post-test for the control or static anchor conditions. Findings are discussed in relation to the extent to which anchor points alone are meaningful in promoting successful segmentation of the number line and whether dynamic cues promote the utility of these locations in reducing error through attentional guidance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1526-1534
Number of pages9
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Issue number7
Early online date1 Jan 2018
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 1 Jul 2018


  • number line
  • attentional guidance
  • gaze following
  • gaze transfer
  • eye movement modelling


Dive into the research topics of 'Learning from where ‘eye’ remotely look or point: impact on number line estimation error in adults.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this