Knowledge transfer for technology based interventions: Collaboration, development and evaluation

PJ McCullagh, GA Mountain, Norman Black, CD Nugent, H Zheng, RJ Davies, Leo Galway, MS Hawley, SJ Mawson, P Wright, C Ecclesone, N Nasr, SJ Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The development of technology based interventions for healthcare requires collaborative working between multidisciplinary groups of scientists, engineers, designers, healthcare professionals, and of course end users. This necessitates transfer of knowledge between the various disciplines, preferably underpinned by defined methodologies. This paper documents the experiences of developing and evaluating two prototypes: the first for tele-rehabilitation of stroke and the second for self management of long term conditions. We have identified two knowledge transfer challenges: domain inspired technology development and prototype evaluation and exploitation. Users should influence the nature of the technology, but decisions must also be informed by technical considerations and possibilities for both hardware and software design. This is a two-way flow of information. How a prototype is taken forward into mainstream practice requires knowledge transfer from academia into the clinical and commercial sectors. Research funding enables both formative and summative prototype evaluation, but does not extend to examination of population based effectiveness, which is the evidence most often sought by health commissioners. A process which provides the necessary underpinning for robust evaluation is proposed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages233-243
JournalTechnology and Disability
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Software design
Patient rehabilitation
Health
Hardware
Engineers

Keywords

  • self management
  • telerehabilitation
  • long term conditions
  • knowledge transfer

Cite this

McCullagh, PJ ; Mountain, GA ; Black, Norman ; Nugent, CD ; Zheng, H ; Davies, RJ ; Galway, Leo ; Hawley, MS ; Mawson, SJ ; Wright, P ; Ecclesone, C ; Nasr, N ; Parker, SJ. / Knowledge transfer for technology based interventions: Collaboration, development and evaluation. 2012 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 233-243.
@article{f6ccd76af54a4960b7514ed738308cf6,
title = "Knowledge transfer for technology based interventions: Collaboration, development and evaluation",
abstract = "The development of technology based interventions for healthcare requires collaborative working between multidisciplinary groups of scientists, engineers, designers, healthcare professionals, and of course end users. This necessitates transfer of knowledge between the various disciplines, preferably underpinned by defined methodologies. This paper documents the experiences of developing and evaluating two prototypes: the first for tele-rehabilitation of stroke and the second for self management of long term conditions. We have identified two knowledge transfer challenges: domain inspired technology development and prototype evaluation and exploitation. Users should influence the nature of the technology, but decisions must also be informed by technical considerations and possibilities for both hardware and software design. This is a two-way flow of information. How a prototype is taken forward into mainstream practice requires knowledge transfer from academia into the clinical and commercial sectors. Research funding enables both formative and summative prototype evaluation, but does not extend to examination of population based effectiveness, which is the evidence most often sought by health commissioners. A process which provides the necessary underpinning for robust evaluation is proposed.",
keywords = "self management, telerehabilitation, long term conditions, knowledge transfer",
author = "PJ McCullagh and GA Mountain and Norman Black and CD Nugent and H Zheng and RJ Davies and Leo Galway and MS Hawley and SJ Mawson and P Wright and C Ecclesone and N Nasr and SJ Parker",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.3233/TAD-2012-0349",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "233--243",
number = "3",

}

McCullagh, PJ, Mountain, GA, Black, N, Nugent, CD, Zheng, H, Davies, RJ, Galway, L, Hawley, MS, Mawson, SJ, Wright, P, Ecclesone, C, Nasr, N & Parker, SJ 2012, 'Knowledge transfer for technology based interventions: Collaboration, development and evaluation', vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 233-243. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2012-0349

Knowledge transfer for technology based interventions: Collaboration, development and evaluation. / McCullagh, PJ; Mountain, GA; Black, Norman; Nugent, CD; Zheng, H; Davies, RJ; Galway, Leo; Hawley, MS; Mawson, SJ; Wright, P; Ecclesone, C; Nasr, N; Parker, SJ.

Vol. 24, No. 3, 2012, p. 233-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge transfer for technology based interventions: Collaboration, development and evaluation

AU - McCullagh, PJ

AU - Mountain, GA

AU - Black, Norman

AU - Nugent, CD

AU - Zheng, H

AU - Davies, RJ

AU - Galway, Leo

AU - Hawley, MS

AU - Mawson, SJ

AU - Wright, P

AU - Ecclesone, C

AU - Nasr, N

AU - Parker, SJ

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The development of technology based interventions for healthcare requires collaborative working between multidisciplinary groups of scientists, engineers, designers, healthcare professionals, and of course end users. This necessitates transfer of knowledge between the various disciplines, preferably underpinned by defined methodologies. This paper documents the experiences of developing and evaluating two prototypes: the first for tele-rehabilitation of stroke and the second for self management of long term conditions. We have identified two knowledge transfer challenges: domain inspired technology development and prototype evaluation and exploitation. Users should influence the nature of the technology, but decisions must also be informed by technical considerations and possibilities for both hardware and software design. This is a two-way flow of information. How a prototype is taken forward into mainstream practice requires knowledge transfer from academia into the clinical and commercial sectors. Research funding enables both formative and summative prototype evaluation, but does not extend to examination of population based effectiveness, which is the evidence most often sought by health commissioners. A process which provides the necessary underpinning for robust evaluation is proposed.

AB - The development of technology based interventions for healthcare requires collaborative working between multidisciplinary groups of scientists, engineers, designers, healthcare professionals, and of course end users. This necessitates transfer of knowledge between the various disciplines, preferably underpinned by defined methodologies. This paper documents the experiences of developing and evaluating two prototypes: the first for tele-rehabilitation of stroke and the second for self management of long term conditions. We have identified two knowledge transfer challenges: domain inspired technology development and prototype evaluation and exploitation. Users should influence the nature of the technology, but decisions must also be informed by technical considerations and possibilities for both hardware and software design. This is a two-way flow of information. How a prototype is taken forward into mainstream practice requires knowledge transfer from academia into the clinical and commercial sectors. Research funding enables both formative and summative prototype evaluation, but does not extend to examination of population based effectiveness, which is the evidence most often sought by health commissioners. A process which provides the necessary underpinning for robust evaluation is proposed.

KW - self management

KW - telerehabilitation

KW - long term conditions

KW - knowledge transfer

U2 - 10.3233/TAD-2012-0349

DO - 10.3233/TAD-2012-0349

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 233

EP - 243

IS - 3

ER -