It's good to talk: children's views on food and nutrition

MC McKinley, C Lowis, PJ Robson, Julie Wallace, M Morrissey, A Moran, Barbara Livingstone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To gain an insight into children's views about food and nutrition. Design: Data were collected in focus group discussions; two focus group sessions were undertaken with each school group. Setting: A total of 11 postprimary schools in Northern Ireland and England. Subjects: In all, 106 children aged 11-12-y-old (n=52 boys, n=54 girls). Results: Focus group transcripts were analysed using qualitative research methodology. Major barriers to healthy eating were taste, appearance of food, filling power, time/effort, cost, choice/availability, risk, rebellion, and body image/weight concerns. The main difference between sexes was in terms of motivating factors for eating well; girls tended to focus primarily on their appearance whereas boys appeared to be more influenced by sport. There was some mention of balance and variety within the focus group discussions, however, in practice, the children had a tendency to categorise foods as either `good' or `bad', `healthy' or `unhealthy'. Conclusions: This study has revealed a number of barriers to, and motivations for, healthy eating, which should be taken into account when planning nutrition intervention strategies aimed at children moving into adolescence. While it may be possible to immediately attempt to address some of the barriers identified in this study, for example, in nutrition education initiatives, other barriers ( such as the lack of available, attractive and affordable healthy foods in the school canteen) will prove more difficult to tackle without changes at the policy level. Overall, it appears that health promotion specialists have a major challenge ahead in order to encourage this age group to view healthy eating as an attractive and achievable behaviour. Sponsorship: Food Standards Agency, London, UK.
LanguageEnglish
Pages542-551
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume59
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

Focus Groups
Food
Northern Ireland
Qualitative Research
Body Image
Health Promotion
Sex Characteristics
England
Sports
Motivation
Research Design
Age Groups
Eating
Education
Weights and Measures
Costs and Cost Analysis
Healthy Diet

Cite this

McKinley, MC., Lowis, C., Robson, PJ., Wallace, J., Morrissey, M., Moran, A., & Livingstone, B. (2005). It's good to talk: children's views on food and nutrition. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 59(4), 542-551. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602113
McKinley, MC ; Lowis, C ; Robson, PJ ; Wallace, Julie ; Morrissey, M ; Moran, A ; Livingstone, Barbara. / It's good to talk: children's views on food and nutrition. In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005 ; Vol. 59, No. 4. pp. 542-551.
@article{6d0a37d957e44bf7b47642da4be77804,
title = "It's good to talk: children's views on food and nutrition",
abstract = "Objective: To gain an insight into children's views about food and nutrition. Design: Data were collected in focus group discussions; two focus group sessions were undertaken with each school group. Setting: A total of 11 postprimary schools in Northern Ireland and England. Subjects: In all, 106 children aged 11-12-y-old (n=52 boys, n=54 girls). Results: Focus group transcripts were analysed using qualitative research methodology. Major barriers to healthy eating were taste, appearance of food, filling power, time/effort, cost, choice/availability, risk, rebellion, and body image/weight concerns. The main difference between sexes was in terms of motivating factors for eating well; girls tended to focus primarily on their appearance whereas boys appeared to be more influenced by sport. There was some mention of balance and variety within the focus group discussions, however, in practice, the children had a tendency to categorise foods as either `good' or `bad', `healthy' or `unhealthy'. Conclusions: This study has revealed a number of barriers to, and motivations for, healthy eating, which should be taken into account when planning nutrition intervention strategies aimed at children moving into adolescence. While it may be possible to immediately attempt to address some of the barriers identified in this study, for example, in nutrition education initiatives, other barriers ( such as the lack of available, attractive and affordable healthy foods in the school canteen) will prove more difficult to tackle without changes at the policy level. Overall, it appears that health promotion specialists have a major challenge ahead in order to encourage this age group to view healthy eating as an attractive and achievable behaviour. Sponsorship: Food Standards Agency, London, UK.",
author = "MC McKinley and C Lowis and PJ Robson and Julie Wallace and M Morrissey and A Moran and Barbara Livingstone",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602113",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "542--551",
journal = "European Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0954-3007",
number = "4",

}

McKinley, MC, Lowis, C, Robson, PJ, Wallace, J, Morrissey, M, Moran, A & Livingstone, B 2005, 'It's good to talk: children's views on food and nutrition', European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 542-551. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602113

It's good to talk: children's views on food and nutrition. / McKinley, MC; Lowis, C; Robson, PJ; Wallace, Julie; Morrissey, M; Moran, A; Livingstone, Barbara.

In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 59, No. 4, 04.2005, p. 542-551.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - It's good to talk: children's views on food and nutrition

AU - McKinley, MC

AU - Lowis, C

AU - Robson, PJ

AU - Wallace, Julie

AU - Morrissey, M

AU - Moran, A

AU - Livingstone, Barbara

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - Objective: To gain an insight into children's views about food and nutrition. Design: Data were collected in focus group discussions; two focus group sessions were undertaken with each school group. Setting: A total of 11 postprimary schools in Northern Ireland and England. Subjects: In all, 106 children aged 11-12-y-old (n=52 boys, n=54 girls). Results: Focus group transcripts were analysed using qualitative research methodology. Major barriers to healthy eating were taste, appearance of food, filling power, time/effort, cost, choice/availability, risk, rebellion, and body image/weight concerns. The main difference between sexes was in terms of motivating factors for eating well; girls tended to focus primarily on their appearance whereas boys appeared to be more influenced by sport. There was some mention of balance and variety within the focus group discussions, however, in practice, the children had a tendency to categorise foods as either `good' or `bad', `healthy' or `unhealthy'. Conclusions: This study has revealed a number of barriers to, and motivations for, healthy eating, which should be taken into account when planning nutrition intervention strategies aimed at children moving into adolescence. While it may be possible to immediately attempt to address some of the barriers identified in this study, for example, in nutrition education initiatives, other barriers ( such as the lack of available, attractive and affordable healthy foods in the school canteen) will prove more difficult to tackle without changes at the policy level. Overall, it appears that health promotion specialists have a major challenge ahead in order to encourage this age group to view healthy eating as an attractive and achievable behaviour. Sponsorship: Food Standards Agency, London, UK.

AB - Objective: To gain an insight into children's views about food and nutrition. Design: Data were collected in focus group discussions; two focus group sessions were undertaken with each school group. Setting: A total of 11 postprimary schools in Northern Ireland and England. Subjects: In all, 106 children aged 11-12-y-old (n=52 boys, n=54 girls). Results: Focus group transcripts were analysed using qualitative research methodology. Major barriers to healthy eating were taste, appearance of food, filling power, time/effort, cost, choice/availability, risk, rebellion, and body image/weight concerns. The main difference between sexes was in terms of motivating factors for eating well; girls tended to focus primarily on their appearance whereas boys appeared to be more influenced by sport. There was some mention of balance and variety within the focus group discussions, however, in practice, the children had a tendency to categorise foods as either `good' or `bad', `healthy' or `unhealthy'. Conclusions: This study has revealed a number of barriers to, and motivations for, healthy eating, which should be taken into account when planning nutrition intervention strategies aimed at children moving into adolescence. While it may be possible to immediately attempt to address some of the barriers identified in this study, for example, in nutrition education initiatives, other barriers ( such as the lack of available, attractive and affordable healthy foods in the school canteen) will prove more difficult to tackle without changes at the policy level. Overall, it appears that health promotion specialists have a major challenge ahead in order to encourage this age group to view healthy eating as an attractive and achievable behaviour. Sponsorship: Food Standards Agency, London, UK.

U2 - 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602113

DO - 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602113

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 542

EP - 551

JO - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

T2 - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0954-3007

IS - 4

ER -

McKinley MC, Lowis C, Robson PJ, Wallace J, Morrissey M, Moran A et al. It's good to talk: children's views on food and nutrition. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2005 Apr;59(4):542-551. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602113