Summary The first year (2003–2004) of a three year nationally funded project focused on completing a scoping exercise on the nature of practice education in five selected health care professions: Dietetics, Nursing, Occupational Therapy, Physiotherapy and Radiography (www.practicebasedlearning.org).A survey questionnaire, focus groups and secondary sources were used to collect data. Profession specific contributors completed the analysis of results. Resulting case studies were combined to produce a cross professional overview of current issues in practice-based learning.The nursing case study identified areas of good practice such as; the mentorship model; the development of new support roles; and joint responsibility between Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) and Health Service areas for practice assessment.However, there were variations in the application of these areas of good practicethroughout the United Kingdom (UK). Issues included; an inadequate supply of qualifiedmentors; formal recognition of the mentor role; and lack of knowledge of therelative impact of the differing mentor preparation programmes.In comparing the five professions, all had statutory requirements regarding the nature of practice learning but each profession differed in how this was managed and organised. The need for formal preparation, recognition and reward for the mentor/practice educator role was recognised with collaborative working across the professions a recommendation in order to achieve national improvement in the quality of practice learning support for health care professions.
Bibliographical noteReference text: Clarke, C.L., Gibb, C.E., Ramprogus, V., 2003. Clinical learning
environments: an evaluation of an innovative role to support
pre-registration nursing placements. Learning in Health and
Social Care 2 (2), 105–115.
Day, C., Fraser, D., Mallik, M., 1998. The Role of the Nurse
Teacher/Lecturer in Practice. Researching Professional Education
No. 8. English National Board, London.
Department of Education, Science and Training, 2002. National
Review of Nursing Education: Our Duty of Care. Department
of Education, Science and Training, Canberra.
Department of Health, 1999. Making a Difference: Strengthening
the Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting Contribution
in Health and Healthcare. Department of Health,
Department of Health, 2004. The NHS Knowledge and Skills
Framework (NHS KSF) and the Development Review Process.
DoH, London (October 2004).
Department of Health and Children, 2001. National Evaluation of
the Role of the Clinical Placement Co-ordinator. Department
of Health and Children, Dublin.
Edmond, C.B., 2001. A new paradigm for practice education.
Nurse Education Today 21 (4), 251–259.
Ellis, R., Hogard, E., 2003. Two deficits and a solution?
Explicating and evaluating clinical facilitation using
consultative methods and multiple stakeholder perspectives.
Learning in Health and Social Care 2 (2), 18–
English National Board and Department of Health, 2001. Preparation
of Mentors and Teachers – a new framework of
guidance. ENB & DOH, London.
English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health
visiting, 1989. Preparation of Teachers, Practitioners, Mentors
and Supervisors in the context of Project 2000. ENB,
Mallik, M., Aylott, E., 2005. Facilitating practice learning in preregistration
nursing programmes: a comparative review of
the Bournemouth collaborative model and Australian models.
Nurse Education in Practice 5, 152–160.
Mallik, M., Aston, L., 2003. Providing educator support for
practice learning. In: Glen, S., Parker, P. (Eds.), Supporting
Learning in Nursing Practice: A Guide for Practitioners.
Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Neary, M., 1999. Preparing assessors for continuous assessment.
Nursing Standard 13 (18), 41–47.
Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2004. NMC Requirements for
Mentors and Mentorship. QA Factsheet O/2004 ENG. NMC,
Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2004a. Consultation on a standard
to support practice learning. NMC, London. Available
Nursing and Midwifery Council, 2005. Consultation on proposals
arising from a review of fitness for practice at the point of
registration. NMC, London. December 2005.
Philips, T., Schostak, J., Bedford, H., Robinson, J., 1994.
Assessment of Competencies in Nursing and Midwifery Education
and Training ACE Project. ENB, London.
Pulsford, D., Boit, K., Owen, S., 2002. Are mentors ready to
make a difference? A survey of mentors’ attitudes towards
nurse education. Nurse Education Today 22 (6), 439–446.
Rafferty, A.M., 1996. The Politics of Nursing Knowledge.
Robinson, N., 1999. The use of focus group methodology – with
selected examples from sexual health research. Journal of
Advanced Nursing 29 (4), 905–913.
United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health
Visiting, 1985. A New Preparation for Practice. UKCC, London.
United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and
Health Visiting, 1999. Fitness for Practice. The UKCCs
Commission for Nursing and Midwifery Education (The Peach
Report). UKCC, London.