Is it harmful? A Thomistic perspective on risk science in social welfare

Saša Horvat, Piotr Roszak, Brian Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Probabilistic information is used increasingly, from medical research to weather forecasting. The relationship between probability and causality requires an acceptable philosophical account. Social work, which contributes to healthy wellbeing, increasingly uses language of probabilistic causal relationships between harms and subsequent limitations to healthy functioning. This paper explores causal understandings of probabilistic knowledge using concepts of the theologian, Thomas Aquinas. Social welfare terminology regarding risk (such as factors that are ‘causative of’ child abuse) is explored using epistemological concepts from scholastic philosophy. Aquinas’ anthropological concepts related to modern ‘risk science’ and his concepts of rationality, harm and prudence are applied to contemporary social welfare.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3302-3316
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Religion and Health
Volume61
Issue number4
Early online date8 Nov 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 31 Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • Epistemology
  • Probability
  • Risk
  • Scholastic philosophy
  • Social work

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is it harmful? A Thomistic perspective on risk science in social welfare'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this