IS EMOTIONAL INTENSITY A GENERAL CONSTRUCT

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intensity and variability are claimed to be important characteristics of emotional responding. Irrespective of the valence attached to a particular mood, individuals are said to respond with a consistent intensity and degree of variability. Mood variability has been reported as an important general factor in a number of studies. Intensity, however, as defined by Larsen and Diener (Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1-39, 1987), has recently been criticised for capitalizing upon a statistical artifact. Despite this, other indices of intensity exist that are free of statistical peculiarities. Peak and trough moods and a questionnaire measure of intensity (AIM) were used to assess the possibility that intensity is an important general construct across moods. The results did not support this hypothesis. Intensity is specific to particular moods, whilst mood variability is consistent across moods.
LanguageEnglish
Pages425-427
JournalPERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES
Volume18
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1995

Fingerprint

artifact
trough
index

Cite this

McConville, C., & COOPER, C. (1995). IS EMOTIONAL INTENSITY A GENERAL CONSTRUCT. 18(3), 425-427.
McConville, Christopher ; COOPER, C. / IS EMOTIONAL INTENSITY A GENERAL CONSTRUCT. 1995 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 425-427.
@article{4863f7c090ed4cdea5bcede0432a7363,
title = "IS EMOTIONAL INTENSITY A GENERAL CONSTRUCT",
abstract = "Intensity and variability are claimed to be important characteristics of emotional responding. Irrespective of the valence attached to a particular mood, individuals are said to respond with a consistent intensity and degree of variability. Mood variability has been reported as an important general factor in a number of studies. Intensity, however, as defined by Larsen and Diener (Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1-39, 1987), has recently been criticised for capitalizing upon a statistical artifact. Despite this, other indices of intensity exist that are free of statistical peculiarities. Peak and trough moods and a questionnaire measure of intensity (AIM) were used to assess the possibility that intensity is an important general construct across moods. The results did not support this hypothesis. Intensity is specific to particular moods, whilst mood variability is consistent across moods.",
author = "Christopher McConville and C COOPER",
year = "1995",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "425--427",
number = "3",

}

McConville, C & COOPER, C 1995, 'IS EMOTIONAL INTENSITY A GENERAL CONSTRUCT', vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 425-427.

IS EMOTIONAL INTENSITY A GENERAL CONSTRUCT. / McConville, Christopher; COOPER, C.

Vol. 18, No. 3, 03.1995, p. 425-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - IS EMOTIONAL INTENSITY A GENERAL CONSTRUCT

AU - McConville, Christopher

AU - COOPER, C

PY - 1995/3

Y1 - 1995/3

N2 - Intensity and variability are claimed to be important characteristics of emotional responding. Irrespective of the valence attached to a particular mood, individuals are said to respond with a consistent intensity and degree of variability. Mood variability has been reported as an important general factor in a number of studies. Intensity, however, as defined by Larsen and Diener (Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1-39, 1987), has recently been criticised for capitalizing upon a statistical artifact. Despite this, other indices of intensity exist that are free of statistical peculiarities. Peak and trough moods and a questionnaire measure of intensity (AIM) were used to assess the possibility that intensity is an important general construct across moods. The results did not support this hypothesis. Intensity is specific to particular moods, whilst mood variability is consistent across moods.

AB - Intensity and variability are claimed to be important characteristics of emotional responding. Irrespective of the valence attached to a particular mood, individuals are said to respond with a consistent intensity and degree of variability. Mood variability has been reported as an important general factor in a number of studies. Intensity, however, as defined by Larsen and Diener (Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1-39, 1987), has recently been criticised for capitalizing upon a statistical artifact. Despite this, other indices of intensity exist that are free of statistical peculiarities. Peak and trough moods and a questionnaire measure of intensity (AIM) were used to assess the possibility that intensity is an important general construct across moods. The results did not support this hypothesis. Intensity is specific to particular moods, whilst mood variability is consistent across moods.

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 425

EP - 427

IS - 3

ER -

McConville C, COOPER C. IS EMOTIONAL INTENSITY A GENERAL CONSTRUCT. 1995 Mar;18(3):425-427.