Introduction: ethical concerns in sport governance

David Hassan, Souvik Naha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

a persistent concern for a number of stakeholders. A combination of the inexorable pres- ence of the media, people’s scepticism of those who run their favourite sports, and vagar- ies of the moral economy of global sport capitalism since the late twentieth century has made governance a newsworthy, momentous and meaningful aspect of elite sports. e media has been attentive to the nancial irregularities, the struggles for recognition, and the political and exploitative aspects of sport governance that have come to light rather frequently since the beginning of the twenty- rst century. It has played a critical role in shaping sport governance too, especially a er the advent of televised sport, sponsorship and marketing. Television forms the economic backbone of modern sport, and digital platforms are set to revolutionize sport coverage. Secondly, sport followers, who double as consumers of media content, understand the challenges of governing what has transformed in the twentieth century from local leisure cultures to highly capitalized industries with a global reach. Depending on their level of interest, they track governance of local clubs, national teams, international federations and similar entities. ey are usually aware of the structures of power and ownership, policy-making at various levels, and violation of accountability. Finally, sport administrators, who are drawn from state representatives and the commercial elite operating in both national and transnational contexts, are obliged to run the show, maximize pro t and connect with supporters. With the exception of the Middle Eastern monarchies and a few other authoritarian states, sport administrators o en subject themselves to self-regulatory measures in order to be legitimized as custodians of the game. Ethical practice is probably one of the most important catechism they encounter at a quotidian level, as transparency and incorruptibility are widely considered necessary attributes of sport governance. e media and sport followers are no exception to the rule of ethics as stakeholders of governance.
LanguageEnglish
JournalSport in Society
Volume37
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 15 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Sports
governance
follower
twentieth century
elite
stakeholder
sponsorship
distribution of power
clubs
federation
transparency
capitalist society
television
marketing
coverage
moral philosophy
responsibility
economy
industry

Keywords

  • Governance
  • Sport
  • Ethics
  • Football

Cite this

@article{6b2a76aa1f80422db85317e07ae75c89,
title = "Introduction: ethical concerns in sport governance",
abstract = "a persistent concern for a number of stakeholders. A combination of the inexorable pres- ence of the media, people’s scepticism of those who run their favourite sports, and vagar- ies of the moral economy of global sport capitalism since the late twentieth century has made governance a newsworthy, momentous and meaningful aspect of elite sports. e media has been attentive to the nancial irregularities, the struggles for recognition, and the political and exploitative aspects of sport governance that have come to light rather frequently since the beginning of the twenty- rst century. It has played a critical role in shaping sport governance too, especially a er the advent of televised sport, sponsorship and marketing. Television forms the economic backbone of modern sport, and digital platforms are set to revolutionize sport coverage. Secondly, sport followers, who double as consumers of media content, understand the challenges of governing what has transformed in the twentieth century from local leisure cultures to highly capitalized industries with a global reach. Depending on their level of interest, they track governance of local clubs, national teams, international federations and similar entities. ey are usually aware of the structures of power and ownership, policy-making at various levels, and violation of accountability. Finally, sport administrators, who are drawn from state representatives and the commercial elite operating in both national and transnational contexts, are obliged to run the show, maximize pro t and connect with supporters. With the exception of the Middle Eastern monarchies and a few other authoritarian states, sport administrators o en subject themselves to self-regulatory measures in order to be legitimized as custodians of the game. Ethical practice is probably one of the most important catechism they encounter at a quotidian level, as transparency and incorruptibility are widely considered necessary attributes of sport governance. e media and sport followers are no exception to the rule of ethics as stakeholders of governance.",
keywords = "Governance, Sport, Ethics, Football",
author = "David Hassan and Souvik Naha",
note = "Reference text: Auwele, Y. V., E. Cook, and J. Parry, eds. 2016. Ethics and Governance in Sport: e Future of Sport Imagined. Abingdon: Routledge. Groeneveld, M., B. Houlihan, and F. Ohl, eds. 2011. Social Capital and Sport Governance in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge. Hassan, D., and S. Hamil. 2010. “Models of Football Governance and Management in International Sport.” Soccer & Society 11 (4): 343–353. Hassan, D., and S. Hamil, eds. 2011. Who Owns Football? Models of Football Governance and Management in International Sport. Abingdon: Routledge. O’Boyle, I., and T. Bradbury, eds. 2013. Sport Governance: International Case Studies. Abingdon: Routledge. Segaert, B., M. eeboom, C. Timmerman, and B. Vanreusel, eds. 2012. Sports Governance, Development and Corporate Responsibility. Abingdon: Routledge. Tomlinson, A. 2014. “ e Supreme Leader Sails on: Leadership, Ethics and Governance in FIFA.” Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics 17 (9): 1155–1169.",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/17430437.2018.1400783",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
journal = "Sport in Society",
issn = "1743-0437",

}

Introduction: ethical concerns in sport governance. / Hassan, David; Naha, Souvik.

In: Sport in Society, Vol. 37, 15.11.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction: ethical concerns in sport governance

AU - Hassan, David

AU - Naha, Souvik

N1 - Reference text: Auwele, Y. V., E. Cook, and J. Parry, eds. 2016. Ethics and Governance in Sport: e Future of Sport Imagined. Abingdon: Routledge. Groeneveld, M., B. Houlihan, and F. Ohl, eds. 2011. Social Capital and Sport Governance in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge. Hassan, D., and S. Hamil. 2010. “Models of Football Governance and Management in International Sport.” Soccer & Society 11 (4): 343–353. Hassan, D., and S. Hamil, eds. 2011. Who Owns Football? Models of Football Governance and Management in International Sport. Abingdon: Routledge. O’Boyle, I., and T. Bradbury, eds. 2013. Sport Governance: International Case Studies. Abingdon: Routledge. Segaert, B., M. eeboom, C. Timmerman, and B. Vanreusel, eds. 2012. Sports Governance, Development and Corporate Responsibility. Abingdon: Routledge. Tomlinson, A. 2014. “ e Supreme Leader Sails on: Leadership, Ethics and Governance in FIFA.” Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics 17 (9): 1155–1169.

PY - 2017/11/15

Y1 - 2017/11/15

N2 - a persistent concern for a number of stakeholders. A combination of the inexorable pres- ence of the media, people’s scepticism of those who run their favourite sports, and vagar- ies of the moral economy of global sport capitalism since the late twentieth century has made governance a newsworthy, momentous and meaningful aspect of elite sports. e media has been attentive to the nancial irregularities, the struggles for recognition, and the political and exploitative aspects of sport governance that have come to light rather frequently since the beginning of the twenty- rst century. It has played a critical role in shaping sport governance too, especially a er the advent of televised sport, sponsorship and marketing. Television forms the economic backbone of modern sport, and digital platforms are set to revolutionize sport coverage. Secondly, sport followers, who double as consumers of media content, understand the challenges of governing what has transformed in the twentieth century from local leisure cultures to highly capitalized industries with a global reach. Depending on their level of interest, they track governance of local clubs, national teams, international federations and similar entities. ey are usually aware of the structures of power and ownership, policy-making at various levels, and violation of accountability. Finally, sport administrators, who are drawn from state representatives and the commercial elite operating in both national and transnational contexts, are obliged to run the show, maximize pro t and connect with supporters. With the exception of the Middle Eastern monarchies and a few other authoritarian states, sport administrators o en subject themselves to self-regulatory measures in order to be legitimized as custodians of the game. Ethical practice is probably one of the most important catechism they encounter at a quotidian level, as transparency and incorruptibility are widely considered necessary attributes of sport governance. e media and sport followers are no exception to the rule of ethics as stakeholders of governance.

AB - a persistent concern for a number of stakeholders. A combination of the inexorable pres- ence of the media, people’s scepticism of those who run their favourite sports, and vagar- ies of the moral economy of global sport capitalism since the late twentieth century has made governance a newsworthy, momentous and meaningful aspect of elite sports. e media has been attentive to the nancial irregularities, the struggles for recognition, and the political and exploitative aspects of sport governance that have come to light rather frequently since the beginning of the twenty- rst century. It has played a critical role in shaping sport governance too, especially a er the advent of televised sport, sponsorship and marketing. Television forms the economic backbone of modern sport, and digital platforms are set to revolutionize sport coverage. Secondly, sport followers, who double as consumers of media content, understand the challenges of governing what has transformed in the twentieth century from local leisure cultures to highly capitalized industries with a global reach. Depending on their level of interest, they track governance of local clubs, national teams, international federations and similar entities. ey are usually aware of the structures of power and ownership, policy-making at various levels, and violation of accountability. Finally, sport administrators, who are drawn from state representatives and the commercial elite operating in both national and transnational contexts, are obliged to run the show, maximize pro t and connect with supporters. With the exception of the Middle Eastern monarchies and a few other authoritarian states, sport administrators o en subject themselves to self-regulatory measures in order to be legitimized as custodians of the game. Ethical practice is probably one of the most important catechism they encounter at a quotidian level, as transparency and incorruptibility are widely considered necessary attributes of sport governance. e media and sport followers are no exception to the rule of ethics as stakeholders of governance.

KW - Governance

KW - Sport

KW - Ethics

KW - Football

U2 - 10.1080/17430437.2018.1400783

DO - 10.1080/17430437.2018.1400783

M3 - Article

VL - 37

JO - Sport in Society

T2 - Sport in Society

JF - Sport in Society

SN - 1743-0437

ER -