Interpersonal regret and prosocial risk taking in children

Bethany Corbett, Aidan Feeney, Teresa McCormack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined the development of regret about choices yielding non-optimal outcomes for the self (intrapersonal regret), but regret can also be experienced when one’s choices lead to poor outcomes for another person (interpersonal regret). We investigated interpersonal regret in children using a novel prosocial risk taking task that closely resembled in structure those used in intrapersonal regret studies. Children chose between two gambles to win a prize for themselves and a peer. In interpersonal trials, acting prosocially required children to incur a risk of winning nothing in order to improve the possible outcomes for another child. Regardless of their choice, children found out that the other child would have had a better outcome if they had chosen differently. Intrapersonal regret trials were also included where the participant themselves received a poor outcome that would have been better if a different choice had been made. Few children of 7-9-years were willing to take a personal risk in order to be prosocial. Those who did choose to take a prosocial risk were more likely to experience interpersonal regret than those who made the non-prosocial choice. There was no association between interpersonal and intrapersonal regret, potentially suggesting that different factors underlie their emergence, with interpersonal regret being prosocially motivated.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101036
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalCognitive Development
Volume58
Issue number101036
Early online date6 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 30 Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Regret
  • Decision making
  • Prosocial behavior
  • Counterfactuals
  • Cognitive development
  • Risk taking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interpersonal regret and prosocial risk taking in children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this