Abstract
This paper examines the interplay between geopolitical goals, governance and International Student Mobility (henceforth ISM). It explores how the United Kingdom's newly envisaged domestic credit‐mobility programme (the Turing Scheme) is reshaping the spatiality of their outward student mobility flows to bolster a global sense of internationalisation through ISM. During its emergence, the Turing Scheme was often positioned as an antithesis to the pre‐established Erasmus+ Scheme which had a strong focus on European integration, instead it focused on promoting a ‘Global Britain’ narrative. This paper conducts a content analysis of Hansard (transcripts of debates in the U.K.'s Houses of Parliament), to reflect on ISM decision‐making, debating the choices made and unmade regarding the development of the Turing Scheme. This research illuminated multiple issues, adding to the debate about the importance of ISM for geopolitical purposes, and how these can underpin credit‐mobility schemes, and shape these during periods of large‐scale geopolitical change.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e27 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-11 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Population, Space and Place |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 22 Oct 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published online - 22 Oct 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Authors. Population, Space and Place published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Keywords
- Credit Mobility
- Erasmus
- Higher Education Policy
- International Student Mobility
- Study Abroad
- Turing Scheme