Interface pressure measurements: Visual interpretation of pressure maps with MS clients

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. Pressure mapping systems provide useful information for pressure care assessment. Healthcare professionals tend to rely upon their colour-coded pressure maps to assist clinical decision-making, based on ranking these from best to worst pressure distribution. The current study investigated whether such ranking is an appropriate method of assessment when compared to use of the numerical output of average and maximum pressure values (mmHg), yielded by the system. Method. This community-based correlational study involved 27 multiple sclerosis clients (15 wheelchair users; 12 non-wheelchair users). Pressure maps were recorded on each participant's current seating surface and on six pressure reducing cushions, using the Force Sensing Array pressure mapping system. Outcome measures included (1) rank order of pressure maps based on visual interpretation by two occupational therapists, (2) average pressure (mmHg) and (3) maximum pressure (mmHg). Visual ranking of the colour-coded pressure maps was correlated with average and maximum pressure values for each map. Results. Correlations between visual ranking of maps and maximum pressures were high for six out of seven surfaces (p < 0.05) for non-wheelchair users; however, they were much less between average pressures and visual interpretation for the same cohort. Similarly, correlations between visual ranking of maps and average pressures for wheelchair users was minimal and was only noted as being high (p < 0.05) on two surfaces when considering maximum pressures and visual interpretation. Conclusions. This study contests the usefulness of the visual ranking of pressure maps in interpreting interface pressures with MS clients, especially with wheelchair users. Visual interpretation of pressure maps by clinicians may be useful in eliminating inappropriate support surfaces from a selection, or those that display easily identifiable `extremes' of pressure values. Clinicians need to incorporate and interpret the numerical data as well as pressure maps when conducting their assessment and making provision.
LanguageEnglish
Pages618-624
JournalDISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume30
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Pressure
Wheelchairs
Color
Multiple Sclerosis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • pressure ulcer
  • interface pressure
  • pressure mapping
  • multiple sclerosis

Cite this

@article{2399e4ce30b44d9b93248179457f87bf,
title = "Interface pressure measurements: Visual interpretation of pressure maps with MS clients",
abstract = "Purpose. Pressure mapping systems provide useful information for pressure care assessment. Healthcare professionals tend to rely upon their colour-coded pressure maps to assist clinical decision-making, based on ranking these from best to worst pressure distribution. The current study investigated whether such ranking is an appropriate method of assessment when compared to use of the numerical output of average and maximum pressure values (mmHg), yielded by the system. Method. This community-based correlational study involved 27 multiple sclerosis clients (15 wheelchair users; 12 non-wheelchair users). Pressure maps were recorded on each participant's current seating surface and on six pressure reducing cushions, using the Force Sensing Array pressure mapping system. Outcome measures included (1) rank order of pressure maps based on visual interpretation by two occupational therapists, (2) average pressure (mmHg) and (3) maximum pressure (mmHg). Visual ranking of the colour-coded pressure maps was correlated with average and maximum pressure values for each map. Results. Correlations between visual ranking of maps and maximum pressures were high for six out of seven surfaces (p < 0.05) for non-wheelchair users; however, they were much less between average pressures and visual interpretation for the same cohort. Similarly, correlations between visual ranking of maps and average pressures for wheelchair users was minimal and was only noted as being high (p < 0.05) on two surfaces when considering maximum pressures and visual interpretation. Conclusions. This study contests the usefulness of the visual ranking of pressure maps in interpreting interface pressures with MS clients, especially with wheelchair users. Visual interpretation of pressure maps by clinicians may be useful in eliminating inappropriate support surfaces from a selection, or those that display easily identifiable `extremes' of pressure values. Clinicians need to incorporate and interpret the numerical data as well as pressure maps when conducting their assessment and making provision.",
keywords = "pressure ulcer, interface pressure, pressure mapping, multiple sclerosis",
author = "May Stinson and Crawford, {S. A.} and Alison Porter-Armstrong",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/09638280701400409",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "618--624",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
number = "8",

}

Interface pressure measurements: Visual interpretation of pressure maps with MS clients. / Stinson, May; Crawford, S. A.; Porter-Armstrong, Alison.

In: DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, Vol. 30, No. 8, 2008, p. 618-624.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interface pressure measurements: Visual interpretation of pressure maps with MS clients

AU - Stinson, May

AU - Crawford, S. A.

AU - Porter-Armstrong, Alison

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Purpose. Pressure mapping systems provide useful information for pressure care assessment. Healthcare professionals tend to rely upon their colour-coded pressure maps to assist clinical decision-making, based on ranking these from best to worst pressure distribution. The current study investigated whether such ranking is an appropriate method of assessment when compared to use of the numerical output of average and maximum pressure values (mmHg), yielded by the system. Method. This community-based correlational study involved 27 multiple sclerosis clients (15 wheelchair users; 12 non-wheelchair users). Pressure maps were recorded on each participant's current seating surface and on six pressure reducing cushions, using the Force Sensing Array pressure mapping system. Outcome measures included (1) rank order of pressure maps based on visual interpretation by two occupational therapists, (2) average pressure (mmHg) and (3) maximum pressure (mmHg). Visual ranking of the colour-coded pressure maps was correlated with average and maximum pressure values for each map. Results. Correlations between visual ranking of maps and maximum pressures were high for six out of seven surfaces (p < 0.05) for non-wheelchair users; however, they were much less between average pressures and visual interpretation for the same cohort. Similarly, correlations between visual ranking of maps and average pressures for wheelchair users was minimal and was only noted as being high (p < 0.05) on two surfaces when considering maximum pressures and visual interpretation. Conclusions. This study contests the usefulness of the visual ranking of pressure maps in interpreting interface pressures with MS clients, especially with wheelchair users. Visual interpretation of pressure maps by clinicians may be useful in eliminating inappropriate support surfaces from a selection, or those that display easily identifiable `extremes' of pressure values. Clinicians need to incorporate and interpret the numerical data as well as pressure maps when conducting their assessment and making provision.

AB - Purpose. Pressure mapping systems provide useful information for pressure care assessment. Healthcare professionals tend to rely upon their colour-coded pressure maps to assist clinical decision-making, based on ranking these from best to worst pressure distribution. The current study investigated whether such ranking is an appropriate method of assessment when compared to use of the numerical output of average and maximum pressure values (mmHg), yielded by the system. Method. This community-based correlational study involved 27 multiple sclerosis clients (15 wheelchair users; 12 non-wheelchair users). Pressure maps were recorded on each participant's current seating surface and on six pressure reducing cushions, using the Force Sensing Array pressure mapping system. Outcome measures included (1) rank order of pressure maps based on visual interpretation by two occupational therapists, (2) average pressure (mmHg) and (3) maximum pressure (mmHg). Visual ranking of the colour-coded pressure maps was correlated with average and maximum pressure values for each map. Results. Correlations between visual ranking of maps and maximum pressures were high for six out of seven surfaces (p < 0.05) for non-wheelchair users; however, they were much less between average pressures and visual interpretation for the same cohort. Similarly, correlations between visual ranking of maps and average pressures for wheelchair users was minimal and was only noted as being high (p < 0.05) on two surfaces when considering maximum pressures and visual interpretation. Conclusions. This study contests the usefulness of the visual ranking of pressure maps in interpreting interface pressures with MS clients, especially with wheelchair users. Visual interpretation of pressure maps by clinicians may be useful in eliminating inappropriate support surfaces from a selection, or those that display easily identifiable `extremes' of pressure values. Clinicians need to incorporate and interpret the numerical data as well as pressure maps when conducting their assessment and making provision.

KW - pressure ulcer

KW - interface pressure

KW - pressure mapping

KW - multiple sclerosis

U2 - 10.1080/09638280701400409

DO - 10.1080/09638280701400409

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 618

EP - 624

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

T2 - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

IS - 8

ER -