Inter-segmental Coordination During a Unilateral 180° Jump in Elite Rugby Players: Implications for Prospective Identification of Injuries.

Kellen Krajewski, Carla McCabe, Aaron Sinnott, Gavin Moir, Hugh Lamont, Susan Brown, Chris Connaboy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Musculoskeletal injuries often occur during the execution of dynamic sporting tasks that involve rotation. The prescription of appropriate prevention strategies of musculoskeletal injury relies on assessments to identify risk, but current assessment tools focus on uniplanar movements. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the utility of the unilateral 180° jump as a potential assessment tool for injury risk in the lower body by (1) providing descriptive kinematics of the knee, thigh, and pelvis (2) conducting inter-segmental coordination analysis, and (3) comparing the knee kinematics between the dominant and non-dominant limb (NDL) during the loading (LOP) and landing phase (LAP). Elite rugby players completed one session, performing five 180° unilateral jumps on each limb while collecting kinematic data. Independent t-tests were used to compare peak angles of DL and NDL. Continuous Relative Phase (CRP) plots were constructed for thorax and pelvis in the transverse plane. At the loading phase, the non-dominant limb had greater peak knee abduction (ABD) (p = 0.01). At the landing phase, the dominant limb had greater peak knee adduction (ADD) (p = 0.05). At the landing phase, the non-dominant limb had greater peak knee ABD (p = 0.01). CRP plots indicate participants can utilize a thorax-led, pelvis-led, or synchronized rotational method. Bilateral asymmetries were observed, indicated by significant differences in the bilateral landing phase peak ADD/ABD, which is of particular interest considering all participants were healthy. Therefore, additional research is needed to determine thresholds for injury risk during rotational tasks.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalApplied Sciences
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Landing
limbs
landing
pelvis
Kinematics
thorax
kinematics
Lead
plots
thigh
asymmetry
conduction
thresholds

Keywords

  • Functional
  • Movement
  • Evaluation
  • Assessment
  • Screen

Cite this

Krajewski, Kellen ; McCabe, Carla ; Sinnott, Aaron ; Moir, Gavin ; Lamont, Hugh ; Brown, Susan ; Connaboy, Chris. / Inter-segmental Coordination During a Unilateral 180° Jump in Elite Rugby Players: Implications for Prospective Identification of Injuries. In: Applied Sciences. 2020 ; Vol. 10.
@article{7812f249e04745ddb7775337ba1d11b7,
title = "Inter-segmental Coordination During a Unilateral 180° Jump in Elite Rugby Players: Implications for Prospective Identification of Injuries.",
abstract = "Musculoskeletal injuries often occur during the execution of dynamic sporting tasks that involve rotation. The prescription of appropriate prevention strategies of musculoskeletal injury relies on assessments to identify risk, but current assessment tools focus on uniplanar movements. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the utility of the unilateral 180° jump as a potential assessment tool for injury risk in the lower body by (1) providing descriptive kinematics of the knee, thigh, and pelvis (2) conducting inter-segmental coordination analysis, and (3) comparing the knee kinematics between the dominant and non-dominant limb (NDL) during the loading (LOP) and landing phase (LAP). Elite rugby players completed one session, performing five 180° unilateral jumps on each limb while collecting kinematic data. Independent t-tests were used to compare peak angles of DL and NDL. Continuous Relative Phase (CRP) plots were constructed for thorax and pelvis in the transverse plane. At the loading phase, the non-dominant limb had greater peak knee abduction (ABD) (p = 0.01). At the landing phase, the dominant limb had greater peak knee adduction (ADD) (p = 0.05). At the landing phase, the non-dominant limb had greater peak knee ABD (p = 0.01). CRP plots indicate participants can utilize a thorax-led, pelvis-led, or synchronized rotational method. Bilateral asymmetries were observed, indicated by significant differences in the bilateral landing phase peak ADD/ABD, which is of particular interest considering all participants were healthy. Therefore, additional research is needed to determine thresholds for injury risk during rotational tasks.",
keywords = "Functional, Movement, Evaluation, Assessment, Screen",
author = "Kellen Krajewski and Carla McCabe and Aaron Sinnott and Gavin Moir and Hugh Lamont and Susan Brown and Chris Connaboy",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "7",
doi = "10.3390/app10020427",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Applied Sciences",
issn = "2076-3417",
publisher = "MDPI",

}

Inter-segmental Coordination During a Unilateral 180° Jump in Elite Rugby Players: Implications for Prospective Identification of Injuries. / Krajewski, Kellen; McCabe, Carla; Sinnott, Aaron; Moir, Gavin; Lamont, Hugh; Brown, Susan; Connaboy, Chris.

In: Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, 07.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inter-segmental Coordination During a Unilateral 180° Jump in Elite Rugby Players: Implications for Prospective Identification of Injuries.

AU - Krajewski, Kellen

AU - McCabe, Carla

AU - Sinnott, Aaron

AU - Moir, Gavin

AU - Lamont, Hugh

AU - Brown, Susan

AU - Connaboy, Chris

PY - 2020/1/7

Y1 - 2020/1/7

N2 - Musculoskeletal injuries often occur during the execution of dynamic sporting tasks that involve rotation. The prescription of appropriate prevention strategies of musculoskeletal injury relies on assessments to identify risk, but current assessment tools focus on uniplanar movements. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the utility of the unilateral 180° jump as a potential assessment tool for injury risk in the lower body by (1) providing descriptive kinematics of the knee, thigh, and pelvis (2) conducting inter-segmental coordination analysis, and (3) comparing the knee kinematics between the dominant and non-dominant limb (NDL) during the loading (LOP) and landing phase (LAP). Elite rugby players completed one session, performing five 180° unilateral jumps on each limb while collecting kinematic data. Independent t-tests were used to compare peak angles of DL and NDL. Continuous Relative Phase (CRP) plots were constructed for thorax and pelvis in the transverse plane. At the loading phase, the non-dominant limb had greater peak knee abduction (ABD) (p = 0.01). At the landing phase, the dominant limb had greater peak knee adduction (ADD) (p = 0.05). At the landing phase, the non-dominant limb had greater peak knee ABD (p = 0.01). CRP plots indicate participants can utilize a thorax-led, pelvis-led, or synchronized rotational method. Bilateral asymmetries were observed, indicated by significant differences in the bilateral landing phase peak ADD/ABD, which is of particular interest considering all participants were healthy. Therefore, additional research is needed to determine thresholds for injury risk during rotational tasks.

AB - Musculoskeletal injuries often occur during the execution of dynamic sporting tasks that involve rotation. The prescription of appropriate prevention strategies of musculoskeletal injury relies on assessments to identify risk, but current assessment tools focus on uniplanar movements. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the utility of the unilateral 180° jump as a potential assessment tool for injury risk in the lower body by (1) providing descriptive kinematics of the knee, thigh, and pelvis (2) conducting inter-segmental coordination analysis, and (3) comparing the knee kinematics between the dominant and non-dominant limb (NDL) during the loading (LOP) and landing phase (LAP). Elite rugby players completed one session, performing five 180° unilateral jumps on each limb while collecting kinematic data. Independent t-tests were used to compare peak angles of DL and NDL. Continuous Relative Phase (CRP) plots were constructed for thorax and pelvis in the transverse plane. At the loading phase, the non-dominant limb had greater peak knee abduction (ABD) (p = 0.01). At the landing phase, the dominant limb had greater peak knee adduction (ADD) (p = 0.05). At the landing phase, the non-dominant limb had greater peak knee ABD (p = 0.01). CRP plots indicate participants can utilize a thorax-led, pelvis-led, or synchronized rotational method. Bilateral asymmetries were observed, indicated by significant differences in the bilateral landing phase peak ADD/ABD, which is of particular interest considering all participants were healthy. Therefore, additional research is needed to determine thresholds for injury risk during rotational tasks.

KW - Functional

KW - Movement

KW - Evaluation

KW - Assessment

KW - Screen

U2 - 10.3390/app10020427

DO - 10.3390/app10020427

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Applied Sciences

T2 - Applied Sciences

JF - Applied Sciences

SN - 2076-3417

ER -