Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options

Patricia Thornley, Paul Upham, Ye Huang, Sina Rezvani, John Brammer, John Rogers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Power generation from biomass is a sustainable energy technology which can contribute to substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, but with greater potential for environmental, economic and social impacts than most other renewable energy technologies. It is important therefore in assessing bioenergy systems to take account of not only technical, but also environmental, economic and social parameters on a common basis. This work addresses the challenge of analysing, quantifying and comparing these factors for bioenergy power generation systems. A life-cycle approach is used to analyse the technical, environmental, economic and social impacts of entire bioelectricity systems, with a number of life-cycle indicators as outputs to facilitate cross-comparison. The results show that similar greenhouse gas savings are achieved with the wide variety of technologies and scales studied, but land-use efficiency of greenhouse gas savings and specific airborne emissions varied substantially. Also, while specific investment costs and electricity costs vary substantially from one system to another the number of jobs created per unit of electricity delivered remains roughly constant. Recorded views of stakeholders illustrate that diverging priorities exist for different stakeholder groups and this will influence appropriate choice of bioenergy systems for different applications.
LanguageEnglish
Pages890-903
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Bioelectric phenomena
bioenergy
environmental economics
Greenhouse gases
greenhouse gas
social impact
power generation
economic impact
Economics
Power generation
savings
Life cycle
electricity
stakeholder
environmental impact
life cycle
Electricity
Gas emissions
Land use
cost

Cite this

Thornley, P., Upham, P., Huang, Y., Rezvani, S., Brammer, J., & Rogers, J. (2009). Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options. Energy Policy, 37(3), 890-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.032
Thornley, Patricia ; Upham, Paul ; Huang, Ye ; Rezvani, Sina ; Brammer, John ; Rogers, John. / Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options. In: Energy Policy. 2009 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 890-903.
@article{285927973a5d4af7835956014fab7d1e,
title = "Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options",
abstract = "Power generation from biomass is a sustainable energy technology which can contribute to substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, but with greater potential for environmental, economic and social impacts than most other renewable energy technologies. It is important therefore in assessing bioenergy systems to take account of not only technical, but also environmental, economic and social parameters on a common basis. This work addresses the challenge of analysing, quantifying and comparing these factors for bioenergy power generation systems. A life-cycle approach is used to analyse the technical, environmental, economic and social impacts of entire bioelectricity systems, with a number of life-cycle indicators as outputs to facilitate cross-comparison. The results show that similar greenhouse gas savings are achieved with the wide variety of technologies and scales studied, but land-use efficiency of greenhouse gas savings and specific airborne emissions varied substantially. Also, while specific investment costs and electricity costs vary substantially from one system to another the number of jobs created per unit of electricity delivered remains roughly constant. Recorded views of stakeholders illustrate that diverging priorities exist for different stakeholder groups and this will influence appropriate choice of bioenergy systems for different applications.",
author = "Patricia Thornley and Paul Upham and Ye Huang and Sina Rezvani and John Brammer and John Rogers",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.032",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "890--903",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Thornley, P, Upham, P, Huang, Y, Rezvani, S, Brammer, J & Rogers, J 2009, 'Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options', Energy Policy, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 890-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.032

Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options. / Thornley, Patricia; Upham, Paul; Huang, Ye; Rezvani, Sina; Brammer, John; Rogers, John.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.03.2009, p. 890-903.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options

AU - Thornley, Patricia

AU - Upham, Paul

AU - Huang, Ye

AU - Rezvani, Sina

AU - Brammer, John

AU - Rogers, John

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - Power generation from biomass is a sustainable energy technology which can contribute to substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, but with greater potential for environmental, economic and social impacts than most other renewable energy technologies. It is important therefore in assessing bioenergy systems to take account of not only technical, but also environmental, economic and social parameters on a common basis. This work addresses the challenge of analysing, quantifying and comparing these factors for bioenergy power generation systems. A life-cycle approach is used to analyse the technical, environmental, economic and social impacts of entire bioelectricity systems, with a number of life-cycle indicators as outputs to facilitate cross-comparison. The results show that similar greenhouse gas savings are achieved with the wide variety of technologies and scales studied, but land-use efficiency of greenhouse gas savings and specific airborne emissions varied substantially. Also, while specific investment costs and electricity costs vary substantially from one system to another the number of jobs created per unit of electricity delivered remains roughly constant. Recorded views of stakeholders illustrate that diverging priorities exist for different stakeholder groups and this will influence appropriate choice of bioenergy systems for different applications.

AB - Power generation from biomass is a sustainable energy technology which can contribute to substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, but with greater potential for environmental, economic and social impacts than most other renewable energy technologies. It is important therefore in assessing bioenergy systems to take account of not only technical, but also environmental, economic and social parameters on a common basis. This work addresses the challenge of analysing, quantifying and comparing these factors for bioenergy power generation systems. A life-cycle approach is used to analyse the technical, environmental, economic and social impacts of entire bioelectricity systems, with a number of life-cycle indicators as outputs to facilitate cross-comparison. The results show that similar greenhouse gas savings are achieved with the wide variety of technologies and scales studied, but land-use efficiency of greenhouse gas savings and specific airborne emissions varied substantially. Also, while specific investment costs and electricity costs vary substantially from one system to another the number of jobs created per unit of electricity delivered remains roughly constant. Recorded views of stakeholders illustrate that diverging priorities exist for different stakeholder groups and this will influence appropriate choice of bioenergy systems for different applications.

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.032

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.032

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 890

EP - 903

JO - Energy Policy

T2 - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

IS - 3

ER -

Thornley P, Upham P, Huang Y, Rezvani S, Brammer J, Rogers J. Integrated assessment of bioelectricity technology options. Energy Policy. 2009 Mar 1;37(3):890-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.10.032