The construction industry in the UK and Ireland has long been accused of being low tech, averse to funding research and development, and reliant on other sectors allied to construction for innovative improvements. One area has been championed as bucking this trend especially post Latham and Egan, and that is construction procurement. The last few decades has witnessed a proliferation of procurement systems and sub-systems, work packaging, organisational relationships, payment systems, contract structures and project participant selection methods. This research proposes a technique to identify and discover if these changes are indeed innovative and provide a method of selecting appropriate procurement systems incorporating these innovations through adoption of a case-based reasoning approach
|Title of host publication||Proceedings of the ICCBR 2011 Workshops|
|Editors||Belen Diaz Agudo, Amelie Cordier|
|Place of Publication||Madrid, Spain|
|Publisher||Association of Researchers in Construction Management|
|Publication status||Published - 12 Sep 2011|
Bibliographical noteHard copy in BERI Office
Reference text: Aamodt, A. (2004), Knowledge Intensive Case-based Reasoning in CREEK, (Proceedings 7th European Conference, ECCBR 2004, Madrid, Spain, August 30 - September 2, 2004 Ed), Springer, Berlin.
Kumaraswamy, M and Dissanayaka, S. (1998), Linking procurement systems to project priorities, Building Research & Information. 26: 4; Pp 223 - 238.
NEDO (1985), Thinking about Building, HMSO, London.
Slaughter, E.S. (1998), Models of construction innovation, Journal of Construction Engineering & Management. 124: 3; Pp 226.
Turoff, M (1975), “The Policy Delphi” in the Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, Addison-Wesley. Harlow
- Artificial Intelligence
- Building Procurement