Abstract

Abstract: The growing global interest in enabling more accountable government through the use of the internet is reflected in international initiatives such as the Open Government Partnership (Noveck, 2009; Robinson et al., 2008; Yu and Robinson, 2012). The primary vehicle for the open government agenda has been the online publication of public sectorinformation – or open data. It has been suggested that open data can improve government transparency, enhance citizen engagement in democratic processes and support increased efficiency and effective in public services. It is also proposed that open data can also enable the creation of value in the private sector by providing entrepreneurial opportunities, ensuring better investor information and accelerating product and service innovation (Guerin, 2013). In both industry and in government there is an on‐going debate about how the principles of openness should be applied and how conflicting needs can be reconciled. In a survey of policy‐makers and experts to identify drivers and barriers to implementing open data policy, six of the top seven issues were related to what might be termed “information governance”, including: privacy, quality, usability, standardisation, security and charging models (Huijboom and Van den Broek, 2011). One possible approach to addressing this problem is through the concept of IP Modularity (Henkel et al., 2012), which applies a modular systems perspective to show how intellectual property can be partitioned so that external innovation is supported while value appropriation is simultaneously protected. We examine how a similar approach can be applied to open data bygeneralising the model to include a wider range of rights and obligations. Information governance (IG) modularity is developed as a theoretical framework, drawing on concepts from configuration design and Fixson’s process perspective (Fixson, 2003).
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationUnknown Host Publication
Pages108-117
Number of pages10
Publication statusPublished - 18 Sep 2014
Event9th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship - Belfast, Northern Ireland
Duration: 18 Sep 2014 → …

Conference

Conference9th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Period18/09/14 → …

Fingerprint

governance
innovation
increased efficiency
intellectual property
investor
transparency
public service
privacy
obligation
private sector
driver
expert
citizen
Internet
industry
Values

Cite this

@inproceedings{bcd5e5b506864cf98a802f412e840012,
title = "Information Governance Modularity in Open Data",
abstract = "Abstract: The growing global interest in enabling more accountable government through the use of the internet is reflected in international initiatives such as the Open Government Partnership (Noveck, 2009; Robinson et al., 2008; Yu and Robinson, 2012). The primary vehicle for the open government agenda has been the online publication of public sectorinformation – or open data. It has been suggested that open data can improve government transparency, enhance citizen engagement in democratic processes and support increased efficiency and effective in public services. It is also proposed that open data can also enable the creation of value in the private sector by providing entrepreneurial opportunities, ensuring better investor information and accelerating product and service innovation (Guerin, 2013). In both industry and in government there is an on‐going debate about how the principles of openness should be applied and how conflicting needs can be reconciled. In a survey of policy‐makers and experts to identify drivers and barriers to implementing open data policy, six of the top seven issues were related to what might be termed “information governance”, including: privacy, quality, usability, standardisation, security and charging models (Huijboom and Van den Broek, 2011). One possible approach to addressing this problem is through the concept of IP Modularity (Henkel et al., 2012), which applies a modular systems perspective to show how intellectual property can be partitioned so that external innovation is supported while value appropriation is simultaneously protected. We examine how a similar approach can be applied to open data bygeneralising the model to include a wider range of rights and obligations. Information governance (IG) modularity is developed as a theoretical framework, drawing on concepts from configuration design and Fixson’s process perspective (Fixson, 2003).",
author = "Brian Cleland and Brendan Galbraith and Barry Quinn and Paul Humphreys",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "18",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-910309-45-2",
pages = "108--117",
booktitle = "Unknown Host Publication",

}

Cleland, B, Galbraith, B, Quinn, B & Humphreys, P 2014, Information Governance Modularity in Open Data. in Unknown Host Publication. pp. 108-117, 9th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 18/09/14.

Information Governance Modularity in Open Data. / Cleland, Brian; Galbraith, Brendan; Quinn, Barry; Humphreys, Paul.

Unknown Host Publication. 2014. p. 108-117.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Information Governance Modularity in Open Data

AU - Cleland, Brian

AU - Galbraith, Brendan

AU - Quinn, Barry

AU - Humphreys, Paul

PY - 2014/9/18

Y1 - 2014/9/18

N2 - Abstract: The growing global interest in enabling more accountable government through the use of the internet is reflected in international initiatives such as the Open Government Partnership (Noveck, 2009; Robinson et al., 2008; Yu and Robinson, 2012). The primary vehicle for the open government agenda has been the online publication of public sectorinformation – or open data. It has been suggested that open data can improve government transparency, enhance citizen engagement in democratic processes and support increased efficiency and effective in public services. It is also proposed that open data can also enable the creation of value in the private sector by providing entrepreneurial opportunities, ensuring better investor information and accelerating product and service innovation (Guerin, 2013). In both industry and in government there is an on‐going debate about how the principles of openness should be applied and how conflicting needs can be reconciled. In a survey of policy‐makers and experts to identify drivers and barriers to implementing open data policy, six of the top seven issues were related to what might be termed “information governance”, including: privacy, quality, usability, standardisation, security and charging models (Huijboom and Van den Broek, 2011). One possible approach to addressing this problem is through the concept of IP Modularity (Henkel et al., 2012), which applies a modular systems perspective to show how intellectual property can be partitioned so that external innovation is supported while value appropriation is simultaneously protected. We examine how a similar approach can be applied to open data bygeneralising the model to include a wider range of rights and obligations. Information governance (IG) modularity is developed as a theoretical framework, drawing on concepts from configuration design and Fixson’s process perspective (Fixson, 2003).

AB - Abstract: The growing global interest in enabling more accountable government through the use of the internet is reflected in international initiatives such as the Open Government Partnership (Noveck, 2009; Robinson et al., 2008; Yu and Robinson, 2012). The primary vehicle for the open government agenda has been the online publication of public sectorinformation – or open data. It has been suggested that open data can improve government transparency, enhance citizen engagement in democratic processes and support increased efficiency and effective in public services. It is also proposed that open data can also enable the creation of value in the private sector by providing entrepreneurial opportunities, ensuring better investor information and accelerating product and service innovation (Guerin, 2013). In both industry and in government there is an on‐going debate about how the principles of openness should be applied and how conflicting needs can be reconciled. In a survey of policy‐makers and experts to identify drivers and barriers to implementing open data policy, six of the top seven issues were related to what might be termed “information governance”, including: privacy, quality, usability, standardisation, security and charging models (Huijboom and Van den Broek, 2011). One possible approach to addressing this problem is through the concept of IP Modularity (Henkel et al., 2012), which applies a modular systems perspective to show how intellectual property can be partitioned so that external innovation is supported while value appropriation is simultaneously protected. We examine how a similar approach can be applied to open data bygeneralising the model to include a wider range of rights and obligations. Information governance (IG) modularity is developed as a theoretical framework, drawing on concepts from configuration design and Fixson’s process perspective (Fixson, 2003).

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-910309-45-2

SP - 108

EP - 117

BT - Unknown Host Publication

ER -