Influence of stormflow and baseflow phosphorus pressures on stream ecology in agricultural catchments

M. Shore, S. Murphy, P.-E. Mellander, G. Shortle, A.R. Melland, L. Crockford, V. O'Flaherty, L. Williams, G. Morgan, P. Jordan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Abstract Stormflow and baseflow phosphorus (P) concentrations and loads in rivers may exert different ecological pressures during different seasons. These pressures and subsequent impacts are important to disentangle in order to target and monitor the effectiveness of mitigation measures. This study investigated the influence of stormflow and baseflow P pressures on stream ecology in six contrasting agricultural catchments. A five-year high resolution dataset was used consisting of stream discharge, P chemistry, macroinvertebrate and diatom ecology, supported with microbial source tracking and turbidity data. Total reactive P (TRP) loads delivered during baseflows were low (1-7 of annual loads), but TRP concentrations frequently exceeded the environmental quality standard (EQS) of 0.035 mg L-1 during these flows (32-100 of the time in five catchments). A pilot microbial source tracking exercise in one catchment indicated that both human and ruminant faecal effluents were contributing to these baseflow P pressures but were diluted at higher flows. Seasonally, TRP concentrations tended to be highest during summer due to these baseflow P pressures and corresponded well with declines in diatom quality during this time (R2 = 0.79). Diatoms tended to recover by late spring when storm P pressures were most prevalent and there was a poor relationship between antecedent TRP concentrations and diatom quality in spring (R2 = 0.23). Seasonal variations were less apparent in the macroinvertebrate indices; however, there was a good relationship between antecedent TRP concentrations and macroinvertebrate quality during spring (R2 = 0.51) and summer (R2 = 0.52). Reducing summer point source discharges may be the quickest way to improve ecological river quality, particularly diatom quality in these and similar catchments. Aligning estimates of P sources with ecological impacts and identifying ecological signals which can be attributed to storm P pressures are important next steps for successful management of agricultural catchments at these scales.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)469 - 483
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume590/1
Early online date9 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2017

Keywords

  • Stormflow
  • Agriculture
  • Baseflow
  • Phosphorus

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of stormflow and baseflow phosphorus pressures on stream ecology in agricultural catchments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Profiles

    No photo of Phil Jordan

    Phil Jordan

    Person: Academic

    Cite this

    Shore, M., Murphy, S., Mellander, P-E., Shortle, G., Melland, A. R., Crockford, L., O'Flaherty, V., Williams, L., Morgan, G., & Jordan, P. (2017). Influence of stormflow and baseflow phosphorus pressures on stream ecology in agricultural catchments. Science of the Total Environment, 590/1, 469 - 483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.100