Influence of land management on soil erosion, connectivity, and sediment delivery in agricultural catchments: Closing the sediment budget

S.C. Sherriff, J.S. Rowan, O. Fenton, P. Jordan, D. Ó hUallacháin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Agricultural land, and arable farming in particular, is commonly associated with increased soil erosion risk. Such systems are most vulnerable during low ground cover periods, but downstream delivery is ultimately controlled by connectivity. This study provides a catchment‐scale sediment budget integrating three discrete but complementary investigations spanning different temporal and spatial scales. The first gives details on suspended sediment fluxes at the catchment outlet (2009–2012). The second provenances sources of fluxes using quantitative sediment fingerprinting. The third sets recent data in a multidecadal (60‐year) context using radiometric (137Cs) field‐scale soil loss estimates. The catchment observatory (11 km2) is low relief with predominantly well‐drained soils and dominated by spring‐sown cereal cropping through the study period. Modelling 137Cs inventory losses across 30 fields provided a catchment‐wide mean soil loss of 2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1. Although such rates are not atypical of intensively managed agriculture across Europe, they are considerably higher than contemporary sediment export yields of 0.12 Mg ha−1 yr−1 of which fingerprinting revealed that contemporary slope erosion contributed less than 25% (0.03 Mg ha−1 yr−1). No evidence of floodplain or in‐channel sediment storage was consistent with disconnectivity. Instead, it is hypothesised that soil loss is associated with coextraction from root crop harvesting of previously widespread sugar beet crops. Considering that the highest mass‐specific 137Cs concentration occurred during the 1960s, there appears to have been significant depletion of the cumulative 137Cs inventory where root crop harvesting occurred as compared with atmospheric fallout ‘reference sites.' The study highlights the value of multiple methodologies when seeking to understand legacy issues within agricultural catchment settings.
LanguageEnglish
Pages2257-2271
Number of pages15
JournalLand Degradation & Development
Volume30
Issue number18
Early online date24 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Dec 2019

Fingerprint

agricultural catchment
sediment budget
land management
soil erosion
connectivity
catchment
sediment
soil
arable farming
sugar beet
ground cover
fallout
cereal
suspended sediment
provenance
floodplain
cropping practice
relief
observatory
agricultural land

Keywords

  • connectivity
  • cultivation
  • land management
  • sediment
  • sediment budget
  • soil erosion

Cite this

@article{e3b55a8a822041cc96aa0e9547daed76,
title = "Influence of land management on soil erosion, connectivity, and sediment delivery in agricultural catchments: Closing the sediment budget",
abstract = "Agricultural land, and arable farming in particular, is commonly associated with increased soil erosion risk. Such systems are most vulnerable during low ground cover periods, but downstream delivery is ultimately controlled by connectivity. This study provides a catchment‐scale sediment budget integrating three discrete but complementary investigations spanning different temporal and spatial scales. The first gives details on suspended sediment fluxes at the catchment outlet (2009–2012). The second provenances sources of fluxes using quantitative sediment fingerprinting. The third sets recent data in a multidecadal (60‐year) context using radiometric (137Cs) field‐scale soil loss estimates. The catchment observatory (11 km2) is low relief with predominantly well‐drained soils and dominated by spring‐sown cereal cropping through the study period. Modelling 137Cs inventory losses across 30 fields provided a catchment‐wide mean soil loss of 2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1. Although such rates are not atypical of intensively managed agriculture across Europe, they are considerably higher than contemporary sediment export yields of 0.12 Mg ha−1 yr−1 of which fingerprinting revealed that contemporary slope erosion contributed less than 25{\%} (0.03 Mg ha−1 yr−1). No evidence of floodplain or in‐channel sediment storage was consistent with disconnectivity. Instead, it is hypothesised that soil loss is associated with coextraction from root crop harvesting of previously widespread sugar beet crops. Considering that the highest mass‐specific 137Cs concentration occurred during the 1960s, there appears to have been significant depletion of the cumulative 137Cs inventory where root crop harvesting occurred as compared with atmospheric fallout ‘reference sites.' The study highlights the value of multiple methodologies when seeking to understand legacy issues within agricultural catchment settings.",
keywords = "connectivity, cultivation, land management, sediment, sediment budget, soil erosion",
author = "S.C. Sherriff and J.S. Rowan and O. Fenton and P. Jordan and {{\'O} hUallach{\'a}in}, D.",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1002/ldr.3413",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "2257--2271",
journal = "Land Degradation & Development",
issn = "1099-145X",
number = "18",

}

Influence of land management on soil erosion, connectivity, and sediment delivery in agricultural catchments: Closing the sediment budget. / Sherriff, S.C.; Rowan, J.S.; Fenton, O.; Jordan, P.; Ó hUallacháin, D.

In: Land Degradation & Development, Vol. 30, No. 18, 03.12.2019, p. 2257-2271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of land management on soil erosion, connectivity, and sediment delivery in agricultural catchments: Closing the sediment budget

AU - Sherriff, S.C.

AU - Rowan, J.S.

AU - Fenton, O.

AU - Jordan, P.

AU - Ó hUallacháin, D.

PY - 2019/12/3

Y1 - 2019/12/3

N2 - Agricultural land, and arable farming in particular, is commonly associated with increased soil erosion risk. Such systems are most vulnerable during low ground cover periods, but downstream delivery is ultimately controlled by connectivity. This study provides a catchment‐scale sediment budget integrating three discrete but complementary investigations spanning different temporal and spatial scales. The first gives details on suspended sediment fluxes at the catchment outlet (2009–2012). The second provenances sources of fluxes using quantitative sediment fingerprinting. The third sets recent data in a multidecadal (60‐year) context using radiometric (137Cs) field‐scale soil loss estimates. The catchment observatory (11 km2) is low relief with predominantly well‐drained soils and dominated by spring‐sown cereal cropping through the study period. Modelling 137Cs inventory losses across 30 fields provided a catchment‐wide mean soil loss of 2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1. Although such rates are not atypical of intensively managed agriculture across Europe, they are considerably higher than contemporary sediment export yields of 0.12 Mg ha−1 yr−1 of which fingerprinting revealed that contemporary slope erosion contributed less than 25% (0.03 Mg ha−1 yr−1). No evidence of floodplain or in‐channel sediment storage was consistent with disconnectivity. Instead, it is hypothesised that soil loss is associated with coextraction from root crop harvesting of previously widespread sugar beet crops. Considering that the highest mass‐specific 137Cs concentration occurred during the 1960s, there appears to have been significant depletion of the cumulative 137Cs inventory where root crop harvesting occurred as compared with atmospheric fallout ‘reference sites.' The study highlights the value of multiple methodologies when seeking to understand legacy issues within agricultural catchment settings.

AB - Agricultural land, and arable farming in particular, is commonly associated with increased soil erosion risk. Such systems are most vulnerable during low ground cover periods, but downstream delivery is ultimately controlled by connectivity. This study provides a catchment‐scale sediment budget integrating three discrete but complementary investigations spanning different temporal and spatial scales. The first gives details on suspended sediment fluxes at the catchment outlet (2009–2012). The second provenances sources of fluxes using quantitative sediment fingerprinting. The third sets recent data in a multidecadal (60‐year) context using radiometric (137Cs) field‐scale soil loss estimates. The catchment observatory (11 km2) is low relief with predominantly well‐drained soils and dominated by spring‐sown cereal cropping through the study period. Modelling 137Cs inventory losses across 30 fields provided a catchment‐wide mean soil loss of 2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1. Although such rates are not atypical of intensively managed agriculture across Europe, they are considerably higher than contemporary sediment export yields of 0.12 Mg ha−1 yr−1 of which fingerprinting revealed that contemporary slope erosion contributed less than 25% (0.03 Mg ha−1 yr−1). No evidence of floodplain or in‐channel sediment storage was consistent with disconnectivity. Instead, it is hypothesised that soil loss is associated with coextraction from root crop harvesting of previously widespread sugar beet crops. Considering that the highest mass‐specific 137Cs concentration occurred during the 1960s, there appears to have been significant depletion of the cumulative 137Cs inventory where root crop harvesting occurred as compared with atmospheric fallout ‘reference sites.' The study highlights the value of multiple methodologies when seeking to understand legacy issues within agricultural catchment settings.

KW - connectivity

KW - cultivation

KW - land management

KW - sediment

KW - sediment budget

KW - soil erosion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071620407&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ldr.3413

DO - 10.1002/ldr.3413

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 2257

EP - 2271

JO - Land Degradation & Development

T2 - Land Degradation & Development

JF - Land Degradation & Development

SN - 1099-145X

IS - 18

ER -