Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Inferring the Causal Structure Among Injection-Induced Seismicity with Linear Intensity Models

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We present a method for earthquake causal attribution, which allows us to quantify the probability that an event is due to tectonic loading, a previous earthquake, or a fluid injection. The method is an extension of the stochastic declustering algorithm of Marsan and Lengliné (2008). Earthquake triggering is represented by nonparametric, mean-field kernels, which scale linearly with the seismic moment or hydraulic energy of the trigger. The kernels are estimated based on a linear intensity model via expectation–maximization, with uncertainties derived from Gaussian approximation of the incomplete-data likelihood. Some general implications of the resulting probabilistic causal structure, including an explicit algorithm to quantify the cascading effects, are illustrated. The estimators are validated using synthetic catalogs generated with an extended epidemic-type aftershock sequence model, which accounts for injection-induced earthquakes. Application to southern California seismicity and comparisons with the nearest-neighbor distance declustering method support the linearity assumption in the seismic moment. Application to seismicity related to CO 2 injection in the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project (for the period 2011–2014) reveals that 11% of the earthquakes were directly triggered by injection, 89% were due to previous earthquakes, whereas the contribution from tectonic loading was negligible (< 1%). The earthquake interaction kernels in both cases show ∼1/t decay in time and indicate triggering by elastic static stress transfer; the injection kernels in the Decatur case suggest pore-pressure diffusion as a more likely mechanism than poroelasticity. The Gutenberg–Richter b-value is estimated to be larger for anthropogenic events (∼1.4) than natural ones (∼1.0). Deviations from the model suggest spatial anisotropy of earthquake interaction in both natural and induced settings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1406-1434
Number of pages29
JournalBulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Volume115
Issue number4
Early online date18 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 31 Aug 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Seismological Society of America.

Data Availability Statement

All synthetic seismicity catalogs, code used to implement the linear intensity model, and plotting scripts are available at the following GitHub repository:
https://github.com/lanl/causal-inductive-seismicity

DOI for the data and code archive (Zenodo):
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10623498

Funding

This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, through the National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP), under award number DE-FE0031704. Additional support was provided by the Center for Space and Earth Science at Los Alamos National Laboratory.

FundersFunder number
National Science Foundation1822214

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
    2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
      SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    3. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action

    Keywords

    • Induced seismicity
    • Hydraulic stimulation
    • Causal inference
    • Linear intensity models
    • Earthquake triggering
    • Seismic hazard
    • Geothermal energy
    • Reservoir monitoring
    • Spatio-temporal modeling
    • Subsurface processes

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Inferring the Causal Structure Among Injection-Induced Seismicity with Linear Intensity Models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this