Indigenous mobilisation and the law of consultation in Peru: A boomerang pattern?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)
    15 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Prior to 2009, it was difficult to speak of a national level Indigenous movement in Peru with an impact on national politics. However, the situation changed after the tragic events known as the Baguazo. Little by little, diverse organisations representing different ethnic groups came together to push for a law of consultation, which was promulgated in 2011. Nevertheless, the process has been highly complex and is still ongoing. The aim of this article is to offer some interpretative clues in order to understand how the national level movement came about, as well as how it made an impact on national political processes. Referring to social movement theory and constructivist international relations theory, I analyse several important episodes between 2009 and 2013. I find that both the convergence and the impact of a national level Indigenous movement in Peru are embedded in complex bargaining processes in which issues of ethnicity and political opportunities at the national level have been affected by the leverage of global norms (specifically the International Labour Organisation's Covenant No. 169) by both international and national actors.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-18
    Number of pages18
    JournalInternational Indigenous Policy Journal
    Volume5
    Issue number4 (2014)
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 29 Sept 2014

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright: © 2014 Western University. Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    Keywords

    • Boomerang effect
    • Ethnicity
    • Globalisation of law
    • ILO Convention No.169
    • Indigenous peoples
    • Peru
    • Political opportunity structures
    • Social movements
    • Transnational advocacy networks

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Indigenous mobilisation and the law of consultation in Peru: A boomerang pattern?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this