Increased Neuromuscular Activity, Force Output, and Resistance Exercise Volume When Using 5-Minute Compared with 2-Minute Rest Intervals Between the Sets

Gerard McMahon, Nathan Best, Timothy Coulter, R M Erskine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

McMahon, G, Best, N, Coulter, T, and Erskine, RM. Increased neuromuscular activation, force output and resistance exercise volume when using 5-minute compared with 2-minute rest intervals between the sets. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2024—Longer rest intervals between resistance exercise (RE) sets may promote greater muscle hypertrophy and strength gains over time by facilitating the completion of greater training volume and intensity. However, little is known about the acute neuromuscular responses to RE sets incorporating longer vs. shorter rest intervals. Using a within-subject, crossover design, 8 healthy, young subjects completed 2 separate acute bouts of 4 sets of 8 × 3-s maximal isometric contractions using either a 2-minute (REST-2) or 5-minute (REST-5) rest interval between sets. Peak torque (PT) and electromyography (EMG) were measured pre and 5 minutes postexercise. Peak torque and mean torque (MT), EMG, mean, and median frequencies were measured during each set, whereas blood lactate (BLa), heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured following each set. Peak torque and MT were lower (p < 0.05) in sets 3 and 4, and sets 2–4 in REST-2 compared with REST-5, respectively. Electromyography and BL were lower and higher, respectively, in REST-2 vs. REST-5. There was no main effect of condition on HR or RPE. Pre-to-post exercise reductions in PT (−17 ± 9% vs. −4 ± 7%) and EMG (−29 ± 14% vs. −10 ± 7%) were greater (p < 0.001) in REST-2 vs. REST-5. Total exercise volume was less in REST-2 vs. REST-5 (9,748 ± 2296 N·m−1 vs. 11,212 ± 2513 N·m−1, p < 0.001). These results suggest that incorporating 5-minute between-set rest intervals into a resistance exercise session facilitates improved neuromuscular function, increased exercise volume, and less metabolic stress compared with 2-minute rest intervals. Thus, 5-minute rest intervals may be more efficacious for promoting muscle hypertrophy and strength gains in a chronic resistance training program.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1527-1534
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Volume38
Issue number9
Early online date2 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 2 Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Keywords

  • activation
  • fatigue
  • quadriceps
  • recovery
  • strength

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Increased Neuromuscular Activity, Force Output, and Resistance Exercise Volume When Using 5-Minute Compared with 2-Minute Rest Intervals Between the Sets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this