In the midst of death we are in life: bio-politics and beginning again in Rwanda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article, using a framework of analysis based on Foucauldian ideas of ‘biopolitics’ and Agamben’s ‘completion’ of that notion, together with the more focused theoriza- tions of Mahmood Mamdani, re-visits two basic questions of the Rwandan genocide which have not been satisfactorily resolved by purely materialist analyses of the roots, dynamics and consequences of the genocide. The first is that of why so many civilians participated in the massacres, or to put the question in strong terms, ‘how could even the most extreme forms of indoctrination or duress have produced such an outpouring of murder by civilians against civilians?’ The second relates to the acknowledged failure by the international community to prevent or stop the genocide, and might be phrased ‘how could so many stand idly by when so little could have prevented such untold suffering?’ The effort is to examine the plausibility and value of linking together on a conceptual (biopolitical) level the ‘internal’ questions of why a genocide in Rwanda and why in that way, with the ‘external’ questions of why non- intervention followed by intervention in the form that it eventually arrived, using in particular Agamben’s theory of the relationship between sovereignty and ‘bare life’.
LanguageEnglish
Pages483-508
JournalSocial and Legal Studies
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Rwanda
genocide
death
politics
non-intervention
massacre
homicide
sovereignty
community

Cite this

@article{ecc1ee3ab03f4469bc39687fb38a5e3d,
title = "In the midst of death we are in life: bio-politics and beginning again in Rwanda",
abstract = "This article, using a framework of analysis based on Foucauldian ideas of ‘biopolitics’ and Agamben’s ‘completion’ of that notion, together with the more focused theoriza- tions of Mahmood Mamdani, re-visits two basic questions of the Rwandan genocide which have not been satisfactorily resolved by purely materialist analyses of the roots, dynamics and consequences of the genocide. The first is that of why so many civilians participated in the massacres, or to put the question in strong terms, ‘how could even the most extreme forms of indoctrination or duress have produced such an outpouring of murder by civilians against civilians?’ The second relates to the acknowledged failure by the international community to prevent or stop the genocide, and might be phrased ‘how could so many stand idly by when so little could have prevented such untold suffering?’ The effort is to examine the plausibility and value of linking together on a conceptual (biopolitical) level the ‘internal’ questions of why a genocide in Rwanda and why in that way, with the ‘external’ questions of why non- intervention followed by intervention in the form that it eventually arrived, using in particular Agamben’s theory of the relationship between sovereignty and ‘bare life’.",
author = "Eugene McNamee",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1177/0964663907082732",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "483--508",
journal = "Social and Legal Studies",
issn = "0964-6639",
number = "4",

}

In the midst of death we are in life: bio-politics and beginning again in Rwanda. / McNamee, Eugene.

In: Social and Legal Studies, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2007, p. 483-508.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - In the midst of death we are in life: bio-politics and beginning again in Rwanda

AU - McNamee, Eugene

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This article, using a framework of analysis based on Foucauldian ideas of ‘biopolitics’ and Agamben’s ‘completion’ of that notion, together with the more focused theoriza- tions of Mahmood Mamdani, re-visits two basic questions of the Rwandan genocide which have not been satisfactorily resolved by purely materialist analyses of the roots, dynamics and consequences of the genocide. The first is that of why so many civilians participated in the massacres, or to put the question in strong terms, ‘how could even the most extreme forms of indoctrination or duress have produced such an outpouring of murder by civilians against civilians?’ The second relates to the acknowledged failure by the international community to prevent or stop the genocide, and might be phrased ‘how could so many stand idly by when so little could have prevented such untold suffering?’ The effort is to examine the plausibility and value of linking together on a conceptual (biopolitical) level the ‘internal’ questions of why a genocide in Rwanda and why in that way, with the ‘external’ questions of why non- intervention followed by intervention in the form that it eventually arrived, using in particular Agamben’s theory of the relationship between sovereignty and ‘bare life’.

AB - This article, using a framework of analysis based on Foucauldian ideas of ‘biopolitics’ and Agamben’s ‘completion’ of that notion, together with the more focused theoriza- tions of Mahmood Mamdani, re-visits two basic questions of the Rwandan genocide which have not been satisfactorily resolved by purely materialist analyses of the roots, dynamics and consequences of the genocide. The first is that of why so many civilians participated in the massacres, or to put the question in strong terms, ‘how could even the most extreme forms of indoctrination or duress have produced such an outpouring of murder by civilians against civilians?’ The second relates to the acknowledged failure by the international community to prevent or stop the genocide, and might be phrased ‘how could so many stand idly by when so little could have prevented such untold suffering?’ The effort is to examine the plausibility and value of linking together on a conceptual (biopolitical) level the ‘internal’ questions of why a genocide in Rwanda and why in that way, with the ‘external’ questions of why non- intervention followed by intervention in the form that it eventually arrived, using in particular Agamben’s theory of the relationship between sovereignty and ‘bare life’.

U2 - 10.1177/0964663907082732

DO - 10.1177/0964663907082732

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 483

EP - 508

JO - Social and Legal Studies

T2 - Social and Legal Studies

JF - Social and Legal Studies

SN - 0964-6639

IS - 4

ER -