Implications of mass communication theory for asymmetric public relations evaluation

Mairead McCoy, Owen Hargie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper considers the implications of mass communications theory on public relations (PR) evaluation and briefly reviews mass communication effects, persuasion, and cognition, attitude and behaviour change theories. The implications for evaluation are then examined. Reliance on domino models is shown to be too simplistic. It is suggested that claims of PR behavioural effects may be unrealistic and it is argued that more moderate and/or alternative goals are needed if preordained failure is to be avoided. Evaluation results must be interpreted cautiously so that further significance that is not supported by theory is not assumed. This paper shows how the concept of PR evaluation could be widened to include formative evaluation and broad environmental monitoring, which are especially important in identifying and understanding why and how communication works, what its effects are, what factors restrict or facilitate effectiveness and under what conditions success can be maximised.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages304-316
    JournalJournal of Communication Management
    Volume7
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint

    Public relations
    communication theory
    mass communication
    Information theory
    evaluation
    Communication
    persuasion
    Monitoring
    cognition
    Communication theory
    Evaluation
    monitoring
    communication

    Cite this

    @article{1867906c73e44910875f121424c018aa,
    title = "Implications of mass communication theory for asymmetric public relations evaluation",
    abstract = "This paper considers the implications of mass communications theory on public relations (PR) evaluation and briefly reviews mass communication effects, persuasion, and cognition, attitude and behaviour change theories. The implications for evaluation are then examined. Reliance on domino models is shown to be too simplistic. It is suggested that claims of PR behavioural effects may be unrealistic and it is argued that more moderate and/or alternative goals are needed if preordained failure is to be avoided. Evaluation results must be interpreted cautiously so that further significance that is not supported by theory is not assumed. This paper shows how the concept of PR evaluation could be widened to include formative evaluation and broad environmental monitoring, which are especially important in identifying and understanding why and how communication works, what its effects are, what factors restrict or facilitate effectiveness and under what conditions success can be maximised.",
    author = "Mairead McCoy and Owen Hargie",
    year = "2003",
    doi = "10.1108/13632540310807449",
    language = "English",
    volume = "7",
    pages = "304--316",
    journal = "Journal of Communication Management",
    issn = "1363-254X",
    number = "4",

    }

    Implications of mass communication theory for asymmetric public relations evaluation. / McCoy, Mairead; Hargie, Owen.

    In: Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2003, p. 304-316.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Implications of mass communication theory for asymmetric public relations evaluation

    AU - McCoy, Mairead

    AU - Hargie, Owen

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - This paper considers the implications of mass communications theory on public relations (PR) evaluation and briefly reviews mass communication effects, persuasion, and cognition, attitude and behaviour change theories. The implications for evaluation are then examined. Reliance on domino models is shown to be too simplistic. It is suggested that claims of PR behavioural effects may be unrealistic and it is argued that more moderate and/or alternative goals are needed if preordained failure is to be avoided. Evaluation results must be interpreted cautiously so that further significance that is not supported by theory is not assumed. This paper shows how the concept of PR evaluation could be widened to include formative evaluation and broad environmental monitoring, which are especially important in identifying and understanding why and how communication works, what its effects are, what factors restrict or facilitate effectiveness and under what conditions success can be maximised.

    AB - This paper considers the implications of mass communications theory on public relations (PR) evaluation and briefly reviews mass communication effects, persuasion, and cognition, attitude and behaviour change theories. The implications for evaluation are then examined. Reliance on domino models is shown to be too simplistic. It is suggested that claims of PR behavioural effects may be unrealistic and it is argued that more moderate and/or alternative goals are needed if preordained failure is to be avoided. Evaluation results must be interpreted cautiously so that further significance that is not supported by theory is not assumed. This paper shows how the concept of PR evaluation could be widened to include formative evaluation and broad environmental monitoring, which are especially important in identifying and understanding why and how communication works, what its effects are, what factors restrict or facilitate effectiveness and under what conditions success can be maximised.

    U2 - 10.1108/13632540310807449

    DO - 10.1108/13632540310807449

    M3 - Article

    VL - 7

    SP - 304

    EP - 316

    JO - Journal of Communication Management

    T2 - Journal of Communication Management

    JF - Journal of Communication Management

    SN - 1363-254X

    IS - 4

    ER -