Implications of divergences in adult protection legislation

Lorna Montgomery, Janet Carter Anand, Kathryn Mackay, Brian J Taylor, Katherine Pearson, Colin Harper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose -This study explores the similarities and differences of legal responses to older adults who may be at risk of harm or abuse in the UK, Ireland, Australia and the United States (US). Design -The authors draw upon a review of elder abuse and adult protection undertaken on behalf of the Commissioner for Older People in Northern Ireland. This paper focuses on the desk top mapping of the different legal approaches and draws upon wider literature to frame the discussion of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the different legal responses. Findings- Arguments exist both for and against each legal approach. Differences in defining the scope and powers of Adult Protection Legislation in the UK and internationally are highlighted. Limitations-This review was undertaken in late 2013; whilst the authors have updated the mapping to take account of subsequent changes, some statutory guidance is not yet available. Whilst the expertise of a group of experienced professionals in the field of adult safeguarding was utilised, it was not feasible to employ a formal survey or consensus model.Practical implications-Some countries have already introduced APL and others are considering doing so. The potential advantages and challenges of introducing APL are highlighted.Social implications -The introduction of legislation may give professionals increased powers to prevent and reduce abuse of adults, but this would also change the dynamic of relationships within families and between families and professionals.Originality-This paper provides an accessible discussion of APL across the UK and internationally which to date has been lacking from the literature.
LanguageEnglish
Pages149-160
JournalJournal of Adult Protection
Volume18
Issue number3
Early online date28 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

divergence
legislation
abuse
Ireland
expertise
Group
literature

Keywords

  • Adult at risk
  • adult protection
  • elder abuse
  • legislation
  • Northern Ireland
  • social work

Cite this

Montgomery, L., Anand, J. C., Mackay, K., Taylor, B. J., Pearson, K., & Harper, C. (2016). Implications of divergences in adult protection legislation. Journal of Adult Protection, 18(3), 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-10-2015-0032
Montgomery, Lorna ; Anand, Janet Carter ; Mackay, Kathryn ; Taylor, Brian J ; Pearson, Katherine ; Harper, Colin. / Implications of divergences in adult protection legislation. In: Journal of Adult Protection. 2016 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 149-160.
@article{8b07df5c85de46919755870911da545b,
title = "Implications of divergences in adult protection legislation",
abstract = "Purpose -This study explores the similarities and differences of legal responses to older adults who may be at risk of harm or abuse in the UK, Ireland, Australia and the United States (US). Design -The authors draw upon a review of elder abuse and adult protection undertaken on behalf of the Commissioner for Older People in Northern Ireland. This paper focuses on the desk top mapping of the different legal approaches and draws upon wider literature to frame the discussion of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the different legal responses. Findings- Arguments exist both for and against each legal approach. Differences in defining the scope and powers of Adult Protection Legislation in the UK and internationally are highlighted. Limitations-This review was undertaken in late 2013; whilst the authors have updated the mapping to take account of subsequent changes, some statutory guidance is not yet available. Whilst the expertise of a group of experienced professionals in the field of adult safeguarding was utilised, it was not feasible to employ a formal survey or consensus model.Practical implications-Some countries have already introduced APL and others are considering doing so. The potential advantages and challenges of introducing APL are highlighted.Social implications -The introduction of legislation may give professionals increased powers to prevent and reduce abuse of adults, but this would also change the dynamic of relationships within families and between families and professionals.Originality-This paper provides an accessible discussion of APL across the UK and internationally which to date has been lacking from the literature.",
keywords = "Adult at risk, adult protection, elder abuse, legislation, Northern Ireland, social work",
author = "Lorna Montgomery and Anand, {Janet Carter} and Kathryn Mackay and Taylor, {Brian J} and Katherine Pearson and Colin Harper",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1108/JAP-10-2015-0032",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "149--160",
journal = "Journal of Adult Protection",
issn = "1466-8203",
number = "3",

}

Montgomery, L, Anand, JC, Mackay, K, Taylor, BJ, Pearson, K & Harper, C 2016, 'Implications of divergences in adult protection legislation', Journal of Adult Protection, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-10-2015-0032

Implications of divergences in adult protection legislation. / Montgomery, Lorna; Anand, Janet Carter; Mackay, Kathryn; Taylor, Brian J; Pearson, Katherine; Harper, Colin.

In: Journal of Adult Protection, Vol. 18, No. 3, 28.04.2016, p. 149-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implications of divergences in adult protection legislation

AU - Montgomery, Lorna

AU - Anand, Janet Carter

AU - Mackay, Kathryn

AU - Taylor, Brian J

AU - Pearson, Katherine

AU - Harper, Colin

PY - 2016/4/28

Y1 - 2016/4/28

N2 - Purpose -This study explores the similarities and differences of legal responses to older adults who may be at risk of harm or abuse in the UK, Ireland, Australia and the United States (US). Design -The authors draw upon a review of elder abuse and adult protection undertaken on behalf of the Commissioner for Older People in Northern Ireland. This paper focuses on the desk top mapping of the different legal approaches and draws upon wider literature to frame the discussion of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the different legal responses. Findings- Arguments exist both for and against each legal approach. Differences in defining the scope and powers of Adult Protection Legislation in the UK and internationally are highlighted. Limitations-This review was undertaken in late 2013; whilst the authors have updated the mapping to take account of subsequent changes, some statutory guidance is not yet available. Whilst the expertise of a group of experienced professionals in the field of adult safeguarding was utilised, it was not feasible to employ a formal survey or consensus model.Practical implications-Some countries have already introduced APL and others are considering doing so. The potential advantages and challenges of introducing APL are highlighted.Social implications -The introduction of legislation may give professionals increased powers to prevent and reduce abuse of adults, but this would also change the dynamic of relationships within families and between families and professionals.Originality-This paper provides an accessible discussion of APL across the UK and internationally which to date has been lacking from the literature.

AB - Purpose -This study explores the similarities and differences of legal responses to older adults who may be at risk of harm or abuse in the UK, Ireland, Australia and the United States (US). Design -The authors draw upon a review of elder abuse and adult protection undertaken on behalf of the Commissioner for Older People in Northern Ireland. This paper focuses on the desk top mapping of the different legal approaches and draws upon wider literature to frame the discussion of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the different legal responses. Findings- Arguments exist both for and against each legal approach. Differences in defining the scope and powers of Adult Protection Legislation in the UK and internationally are highlighted. Limitations-This review was undertaken in late 2013; whilst the authors have updated the mapping to take account of subsequent changes, some statutory guidance is not yet available. Whilst the expertise of a group of experienced professionals in the field of adult safeguarding was utilised, it was not feasible to employ a formal survey or consensus model.Practical implications-Some countries have already introduced APL and others are considering doing so. The potential advantages and challenges of introducing APL are highlighted.Social implications -The introduction of legislation may give professionals increased powers to prevent and reduce abuse of adults, but this would also change the dynamic of relationships within families and between families and professionals.Originality-This paper provides an accessible discussion of APL across the UK and internationally which to date has been lacking from the literature.

KW - Adult at risk

KW - adult protection

KW - elder abuse

KW - legislation

KW - Northern Ireland

KW - social work

U2 - 10.1108/JAP-10-2015-0032

DO - 10.1108/JAP-10-2015-0032

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 149

EP - 160

JO - Journal of Adult Protection

T2 - Journal of Adult Protection

JF - Journal of Adult Protection

SN - 1466-8203

IS - 3

ER -