Impacting the rugby tackle: risk factors and mechanisms for concussion and musculoskeletal tackle-related injury — a systematic review and Delphi consensus to inform intervention strategies for risk reduction

  • Mike Hopkinson
  • , Sharief Hendricks
  • , Ben Jones
  • , Gareth Nicholson
  • , Jon S Patricios
  • , Kathryn Dane
  • , Andrew J Gardner
  • , David R Howell
  • , Cameron Owen
  • , Kenneth L Quarrie
  • , Gregory Tierney
  • , Kevin Till
  • , Fiona Wilson
  • , Rich D Johnston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To (1) systematically review the literature to identify which match-related risk factors and mechanisms of rugby tackle events result in musculoskeletal injury, concussion, head injury assessments, and head impacts or head accelerations; and (2) identify the perceived importance and feasibility of potential intervention strategies for tackle-related injury reduction in the rugby codes. A systematic search was performed using Preferred Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk factors/mechanisms associated with tackle injuries across the rugby codes were extracted. After extraction, 50 international rugby experts participated in a Delphi poll. Via content analysis, expert-recommended risk factors/mechanisms were developed. In round two, experts rated all risk factors and mechanisms for importance to injury risk. In round three, the feasibility of law changes, coach and player education, and training as interventions to reduce injury risk for each injury risk factor/mechanism deemed important during round two was rated. PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost) and CINAHL. Eligible studies included cohort, observational and cross-sectional designs, which included male or female rugby union, league or sevens players. 37 eligible studies were identified, with 138 injury risk factors/mechanisms extracted. 70% of the studies were rated ‘high quality’, with 30% moderate quality. 38 new risk factors/mechanisms were recommended by the expert group, 8 being identified as important and highly feasible for modification by an intervention strategy. ‘The tackler placing their head on the incorrect side of the ball carrier’ was described as the most important mechanism, with ‘training’ and ‘coach/player education’ thought to be highly feasible interventions. Numerous risk factors or mechanisms associated with tackle-related injury appear important and modifiable, helping to guide interventions to reduce injury risk in the rugby tackle.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108992
Pages (from-to)1397-1409
Number of pages13
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume59
Issue number20
Early online date19 Aug 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 30 Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025.

Funding

The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

FundersFunder number
Hunter Medical Research Institute
National Health and Medical Research Council
R01NS100952, R43NS108823
R03HD094560, R01HD108133
UL1 TR002535‐05
1R13AR080451

    Keywords

    • Brain Concussion
    • Rugby
    • Wounds and Injuries
    • Football/injuries
    • Delphi Technique
    • Risk Reduction Behavior
    • Athletic Injuries/prevention & control
    • Musculoskeletal System/injuries
    • Humans
    • Risk Factors
    • Consensus
    • Brain Concussion/prevention & control

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Impacting the rugby tackle: risk factors and mechanisms for concussion and musculoskeletal tackle-related injury — a systematic review and Delphi consensus to inform intervention strategies for risk reduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this