Impact of range of motion during ecologically valid resistance training protocols on muscle size, subcutaneous fat, and strength.

Gerard Mc Mahon, Christopher I Morse, Adrian Burden, Keith Winwood, Gladys L Onambele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Citations (Scopus)


The impact of using different resistance training (RT) kinematics, which therefore alters RT mechanics, and their subsequent effect on adaptations remain largely unreported. The aim of this study was to identify the differences to training at a longer (LR) compared with a shorter (SR) range of motion (ROM) and the time course of any changes during detraining. Recreationally active participants in LR (aged 19 ± 2.6 years; n = 8) and SR (aged 19 ± 3.4 years; n = 8) groups undertook 8 weeks of RT and 4 weeks of detraining. Muscle size, architecture, subcutaneous fat, and strength were measured at weeks 0, 8, 10, and 12 (repeated measures). A control group (aged 23 ± 2.4 years; n = 10) was also monitored during this period. Significant (p > 0.05) posttraining differences existed in strength (on average 4 ± 2 vs. 18 ± 2%), distal anatomical cross-sectional area (59 ± 15 vs. 16 ± 10%), fascicle length (23 ± 5 vs. 10 ± 2%), and subcutaneous fat (22 ± 8 vs. 5 ± 2%), with LR exhibiting greater adaptations than SR. Detraining resulted in significant (p > 0.05) deteriorations in all muscle parameters measured in both groups, with the SR group experiencing a more rapid relative loss of postexercise increases in strength than that experienced by the LR group (p > 0.05). Greater morphological and architectural RT adaptations in the LR (owing to higher mechanical stress) result in a more significant increase in strength compared with that of the SR. The practical implications for this body of work follow that LR should be observed in RT where increased muscle strength and size are the objective, because we demonstrate here that ROM should not be compromised for greater external loading.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-255
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 1 Jan 2014


  • detraining
  • hypertrophy
  • muscle architecture
  • range of motion
  • stress
  • strength training


Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of range of motion during ecologically valid resistance training protocols on muscle size, subcutaneous fat, and strength.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this