Imaging of Corneal Neovascularization: Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescence Angiography

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare optical coherence tomographyangiography (OCTA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) for the assessment ofcorneal neovascularization (CoNV).METHODS. Patients with CoNV extending at least 3 mm into the cornea were included. Allpatients underwent corneal imaging at the same visit. Images were recorded using theAngioVue OCTA system (Optovue, Inc.) with the long corneal adaptor module (CAM-L). ICGAimages were recorded with fluorescent filters using the Heidelberg system (HRA2 ScanningLaser Ophthalmoscope; Heidelberg Engineering). Images were graded for quality by twoindependent observers. Vessel parameters: area, number, diameter, branch and end points,and tortuosity, were compared between devices. Bland-Altman plots were used to assessdifferences between parameters.RESULTS. Fifteen patients with CoNV predominantly associated with microbial keratitis wereincluded. Mean subjective image quality score was better for ICGA (3.3 6 0.9) than for OCTA(2.1 6 1.2, P ¼ 0.002), with almost perfect interobserver agreement for ICGA images (j ¼0.83) and substantial agreement for OCTA images (j ¼ 0.69). Agreement of grading of allinvestigated vessel parameters between ICGA and OCT images was slight to moderate, withsignificant differences found for vessel diameter (�8.98 lm, P ¼ 0.01, 95% limits ofagreement [LOA]: �15.89 to �2.07), number of branch (25.93, P ¼ 0.09, 95% LOA: �4.31 to56.17), and terminal points (49, P ¼ 0.05, 95% LOA: 0.78 to 97.22).CONCLUSION. Compared with ICGA, current OCTA systems are less precise in capturing smallvessels in CoNV complexes, and validation studies are needed for OCTA segmentationsoftware. OCTA, however, complements ICGA by providing evidence of red blood cell flow,which together with depth information, may be helpful when planning treatment of CoNV.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1263-1269
JournalInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
Volume59
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 8 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Corneal Neovascularization
Indocyanine Green
Fluorescein Angiography
Optical Coherence Tomography
Angiography
Ophthalmoscopes
Keratitis
Validation Studies
Cornea
Erythrocytes
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • corneal imaging
  • cornea neovascularization
  • optical coherence tomography angiography
  • fluorescence angiography
  • indocyanine green angiography

Cite this

@article{28839c89b7774eddac41ade812a931e8,
title = "Imaging of Corneal Neovascularization: Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescence Angiography",
abstract = "PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare optical coherence tomographyangiography (OCTA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) for the assessment ofcorneal neovascularization (CoNV).METHODS. Patients with CoNV extending at least 3 mm into the cornea were included. Allpatients underwent corneal imaging at the same visit. Images were recorded using theAngioVue OCTA system (Optovue, Inc.) with the long corneal adaptor module (CAM-L). ICGAimages were recorded with fluorescent filters using the Heidelberg system (HRA2 ScanningLaser Ophthalmoscope; Heidelberg Engineering). Images were graded for quality by twoindependent observers. Vessel parameters: area, number, diameter, branch and end points,and tortuosity, were compared between devices. Bland-Altman plots were used to assessdifferences between parameters.RESULTS. Fifteen patients with CoNV predominantly associated with microbial keratitis wereincluded. Mean subjective image quality score was better for ICGA (3.3 6 0.9) than for OCTA(2.1 6 1.2, P ¼ 0.002), with almost perfect interobserver agreement for ICGA images (j ¼0.83) and substantial agreement for OCTA images (j ¼ 0.69). Agreement of grading of allinvestigated vessel parameters between ICGA and OCT images was slight to moderate, withsignificant differences found for vessel diameter (�8.98 lm, P ¼ 0.01, 95{\%} limits ofagreement [LOA]: �15.89 to �2.07), number of branch (25.93, P ¼ 0.09, 95{\%} LOA: �4.31 to56.17), and terminal points (49, P ¼ 0.05, 95{\%} LOA: 0.78 to 97.22).CONCLUSION. Compared with ICGA, current OCTA systems are less precise in capturing smallvessels in CoNV complexes, and validation studies are needed for OCTA segmentationsoftware. OCTA, however, complements ICGA by providing evidence of red blood cell flow,which together with depth information, may be helpful when planning treatment of CoNV.",
keywords = "corneal imaging, cornea neovascularization, optical coherence tomography angiography, fluorescence angiography, indocyanine green angiography",
author = "Colin Willoughby",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "1263--1269",
journal = "Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science",
issn = "0146-0404",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging of Corneal Neovascularization: Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescence Angiography

AU - Willoughby, Colin

PY - 2018/2/8

Y1 - 2018/2/8

N2 - PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare optical coherence tomographyangiography (OCTA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) for the assessment ofcorneal neovascularization (CoNV).METHODS. Patients with CoNV extending at least 3 mm into the cornea were included. Allpatients underwent corneal imaging at the same visit. Images were recorded using theAngioVue OCTA system (Optovue, Inc.) with the long corneal adaptor module (CAM-L). ICGAimages were recorded with fluorescent filters using the Heidelberg system (HRA2 ScanningLaser Ophthalmoscope; Heidelberg Engineering). Images were graded for quality by twoindependent observers. Vessel parameters: area, number, diameter, branch and end points,and tortuosity, were compared between devices. Bland-Altman plots were used to assessdifferences between parameters.RESULTS. Fifteen patients with CoNV predominantly associated with microbial keratitis wereincluded. Mean subjective image quality score was better for ICGA (3.3 6 0.9) than for OCTA(2.1 6 1.2, P ¼ 0.002), with almost perfect interobserver agreement for ICGA images (j ¼0.83) and substantial agreement for OCTA images (j ¼ 0.69). Agreement of grading of allinvestigated vessel parameters between ICGA and OCT images was slight to moderate, withsignificant differences found for vessel diameter (�8.98 lm, P ¼ 0.01, 95% limits ofagreement [LOA]: �15.89 to �2.07), number of branch (25.93, P ¼ 0.09, 95% LOA: �4.31 to56.17), and terminal points (49, P ¼ 0.05, 95% LOA: 0.78 to 97.22).CONCLUSION. Compared with ICGA, current OCTA systems are less precise in capturing smallvessels in CoNV complexes, and validation studies are needed for OCTA segmentationsoftware. OCTA, however, complements ICGA by providing evidence of red blood cell flow,which together with depth information, may be helpful when planning treatment of CoNV.

AB - PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare optical coherence tomographyangiography (OCTA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) for the assessment ofcorneal neovascularization (CoNV).METHODS. Patients with CoNV extending at least 3 mm into the cornea were included. Allpatients underwent corneal imaging at the same visit. Images were recorded using theAngioVue OCTA system (Optovue, Inc.) with the long corneal adaptor module (CAM-L). ICGAimages were recorded with fluorescent filters using the Heidelberg system (HRA2 ScanningLaser Ophthalmoscope; Heidelberg Engineering). Images were graded for quality by twoindependent observers. Vessel parameters: area, number, diameter, branch and end points,and tortuosity, were compared between devices. Bland-Altman plots were used to assessdifferences between parameters.RESULTS. Fifteen patients with CoNV predominantly associated with microbial keratitis wereincluded. Mean subjective image quality score was better for ICGA (3.3 6 0.9) than for OCTA(2.1 6 1.2, P ¼ 0.002), with almost perfect interobserver agreement for ICGA images (j ¼0.83) and substantial agreement for OCTA images (j ¼ 0.69). Agreement of grading of allinvestigated vessel parameters between ICGA and OCT images was slight to moderate, withsignificant differences found for vessel diameter (�8.98 lm, P ¼ 0.01, 95% limits ofagreement [LOA]: �15.89 to �2.07), number of branch (25.93, P ¼ 0.09, 95% LOA: �4.31 to56.17), and terminal points (49, P ¼ 0.05, 95% LOA: 0.78 to 97.22).CONCLUSION. Compared with ICGA, current OCTA systems are less precise in capturing smallvessels in CoNV complexes, and validation studies are needed for OCTA segmentationsoftware. OCTA, however, complements ICGA by providing evidence of red blood cell flow,which together with depth information, may be helpful when planning treatment of CoNV.

KW - corneal imaging

KW - cornea neovascularization

KW - optical coherence tomography angiography

KW - fluorescence angiography

KW - indocyanine green angiography

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 1263

EP - 1269

JO - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

T2 - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

JF - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

SN - 0146-0404

ER -