Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability

P.-E. Mellander, P. Jordan, M. Shore, N.T. McDonald, D.P. Wall, G. Shortle, K. Daly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two groundwater dominated catchments with contrasting land use (Grassland and Arable) and soil chemistry were investigated for influences on P transfer below the rooting zone, via the aquifer and into the rivers. The objective was to improve the understanding of hydrochemical process for best management practise and determine the importance of P transfer via groundwater pathways. Despite the catchments having similar inorganic P reserves, the iron-rich soils of the Grassland catchment favoured P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater. Sites in that catchment had elevated dissolved reactive P concentrations in groundwater (>0.035 mg/l) and the river had flow-weighted mean TRP concentrations almost three times that of the aluminium-rich Arable catchment (0.067 mg/l compared to 0.023 mg/l). While the average annual TRP flux was low in both catchments (although three times higher in the Grassland catchment; 0.385 kg/ha compared to 0.128 kg/ha), 50% and 59% of TRP was lost via groundwater, respectively, during winter periods that were closed for fertiliser application. For policy reviews, slow-flow pathways and associated time-lags between fertiliser application, mobilisation of soil P reserves and delivery to the river should be carefully considered when reviewing mitigating strategies and efficacy of mitigating measures in groundwater fed catchments. For example, while the Grassland catchment indicated a soil-P chemistry susceptibility, the Arable catchment indicated a transient point source control; both resulted in sustained or transient periods of elevated low river-flow P concentrations, respectively.
LanguageEnglish
Pages292 - 302
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume541
Early online date25 Sep 2015
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Sep 2015

Fingerprint

Surface waters
Catchments
Phosphorus
Groundwater
vulnerability
catchment
phosphorus
surface water
groundwater
Rivers
grassland
Soils
Fertilizers
fertilizer application
river flow
mobilization
soil
soil chemistry
best management practice
rooting

Keywords

  • Eutrophication
  • phosphorus
  • groundwater
  • catchments
  • agriculture

Cite this

Mellander, P.-E. ; Jordan, P. ; Shore, M. ; McDonald, N.T. ; Wall, D.P. ; Shortle, G. ; Daly, K. / Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability. 2015 ; Vol. 541. pp. 292 - 302.
@article{2436fec594354463903bc9578600535f,
title = "Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability",
abstract = "Two groundwater dominated catchments with contrasting land use (Grassland and Arable) and soil chemistry were investigated for influences on P transfer below the rooting zone, via the aquifer and into the rivers. The objective was to improve the understanding of hydrochemical process for best management practise and determine the importance of P transfer via groundwater pathways. Despite the catchments having similar inorganic P reserves, the iron-rich soils of the Grassland catchment favoured P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater. Sites in that catchment had elevated dissolved reactive P concentrations in groundwater (>0.035 mg/l) and the river had flow-weighted mean TRP concentrations almost three times that of the aluminium-rich Arable catchment (0.067 mg/l compared to 0.023 mg/l). While the average annual TRP flux was low in both catchments (although three times higher in the Grassland catchment; 0.385 kg/ha compared to 0.128 kg/ha), 50{\%} and 59{\%} of TRP was lost via groundwater, respectively, during winter periods that were closed for fertiliser application. For policy reviews, slow-flow pathways and associated time-lags between fertiliser application, mobilisation of soil P reserves and delivery to the river should be carefully considered when reviewing mitigating strategies and efficacy of mitigating measures in groundwater fed catchments. For example, while the Grassland catchment indicated a soil-P chemistry susceptibility, the Arable catchment indicated a transient point source control; both resulted in sustained or transient periods of elevated low river-flow P concentrations, respectively.",
keywords = "Eutrophication, phosphorus, groundwater, catchments, agriculture",
author = "P.-E. Mellander and P. Jordan and M. Shore and N.T. McDonald and D.P. Wall and G. Shortle and K. Daly",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.082",
language = "English",
volume = "541",
pages = "292 -- 302",

}

Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability. / Mellander, P.-E.; Jordan, P.; Shore, M.; McDonald, N.T.; Wall, D.P.; Shortle, G.; Daly, K.

Vol. 541, 25.09.2015, p. 292 - 302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying contrasting influences and surface water signals for specific groundwater phosphorus vulnerability

AU - Mellander, P.-E.

AU - Jordan, P.

AU - Shore, M.

AU - McDonald, N.T.

AU - Wall, D.P.

AU - Shortle, G.

AU - Daly, K.

PY - 2015/9/25

Y1 - 2015/9/25

N2 - Two groundwater dominated catchments with contrasting land use (Grassland and Arable) and soil chemistry were investigated for influences on P transfer below the rooting zone, via the aquifer and into the rivers. The objective was to improve the understanding of hydrochemical process for best management practise and determine the importance of P transfer via groundwater pathways. Despite the catchments having similar inorganic P reserves, the iron-rich soils of the Grassland catchment favoured P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater. Sites in that catchment had elevated dissolved reactive P concentrations in groundwater (>0.035 mg/l) and the river had flow-weighted mean TRP concentrations almost three times that of the aluminium-rich Arable catchment (0.067 mg/l compared to 0.023 mg/l). While the average annual TRP flux was low in both catchments (although three times higher in the Grassland catchment; 0.385 kg/ha compared to 0.128 kg/ha), 50% and 59% of TRP was lost via groundwater, respectively, during winter periods that were closed for fertiliser application. For policy reviews, slow-flow pathways and associated time-lags between fertiliser application, mobilisation of soil P reserves and delivery to the river should be carefully considered when reviewing mitigating strategies and efficacy of mitigating measures in groundwater fed catchments. For example, while the Grassland catchment indicated a soil-P chemistry susceptibility, the Arable catchment indicated a transient point source control; both resulted in sustained or transient periods of elevated low river-flow P concentrations, respectively.

AB - Two groundwater dominated catchments with contrasting land use (Grassland and Arable) and soil chemistry were investigated for influences on P transfer below the rooting zone, via the aquifer and into the rivers. The objective was to improve the understanding of hydrochemical process for best management practise and determine the importance of P transfer via groundwater pathways. Despite the catchments having similar inorganic P reserves, the iron-rich soils of the Grassland catchment favoured P mobilisation into soluble form and transfer to groundwater. Sites in that catchment had elevated dissolved reactive P concentrations in groundwater (>0.035 mg/l) and the river had flow-weighted mean TRP concentrations almost three times that of the aluminium-rich Arable catchment (0.067 mg/l compared to 0.023 mg/l). While the average annual TRP flux was low in both catchments (although three times higher in the Grassland catchment; 0.385 kg/ha compared to 0.128 kg/ha), 50% and 59% of TRP was lost via groundwater, respectively, during winter periods that were closed for fertiliser application. For policy reviews, slow-flow pathways and associated time-lags between fertiliser application, mobilisation of soil P reserves and delivery to the river should be carefully considered when reviewing mitigating strategies and efficacy of mitigating measures in groundwater fed catchments. For example, while the Grassland catchment indicated a soil-P chemistry susceptibility, the Arable catchment indicated a transient point source control; both resulted in sustained or transient periods of elevated low river-flow P concentrations, respectively.

KW - Eutrophication

KW - phosphorus

KW - groundwater

KW - catchments

KW - agriculture

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.082

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.082

M3 - Article

VL - 541

SP - 292

EP - 302

ER -