Identification of key process areas in the production on an e-capability maturity model for UK construction organisations

Robert Eadie, Srinath Perera, George Heaney

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    3 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Uptake of e-procurement by construction organisations has been slow (Martin, 2008). Positive
    e-business achievements in other industries, point towards the potential for the construction
    industry to accomplish similar results. Since the Modernising Government White paper set
    targets through best value indicator BV157 for implementation in the public sector,
    government has supported many initiatives encouraging e-procurement. These are based on
    documented efficiency and cost savings (Knudsen, 2003; Minahan and Degan, 2001; McIntosh
    and Sloan, 2001; Martin, 2008). However, Martin (2003, 2008) demonstrates only a modest
    increase in the uptake of e-procurement in the UK construction industry.
    Alshawi et al (2004) identified the significance of possessing a model to sustain the
    embedment of any business process within an organisation. Saleh and Alshawi (2005) describe
    a number of model types used to gauge maturity in an organisation. One of these models is the
    capability maturity model. Paulk et al (1993) released the Software Capability Maturity Model
    (CMM) in 1991. Since then many CMM’s have evolved. This paper reports on how a CMM
    based on Drivers and Barriers to e-procurement identified in Eadie et al (2010a, 2010b) can be
    developed to gauge the maturity of an organisation in relation to e-procurement.
    This paper presents details of a research project which used factor analysis to produce a set of
    Key Process Areas (KPA) from the drivers and barriers identified in Eadie et al (2010a, 2010b).
    These KPAs were then subjected to a mapping process linking them to maturity levels to
    develop a CMM to analyse the e-procurement capability of construction organisations. This
    termed as e-readiness of organisations will indicate the current state of a construction
    organisation in terms of its readiness to carry out e-procurement. The paper describes in detail
    the identification of the KPA’s.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 6th International Conference on Innovation in Architecture, Engineering & Construction (AEC)
    EditorsC.J. Anumba, N.M. Bouchlaghem, J.I. Messner, M.K. Parfitt
    Place of PublicationEngland
    PublisherLoughborough University
    ChapterVol. 1
    Pages413-426
    Number of pages13
    Volume1
    ISBN (Print)978-1-897911-35-8
    Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 2010
    Event6th International Conference on Innovation in Architecture, Engineering & Construction (AEC) - The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering, State College, United States
    Duration: 9 Jun 201011 Jun 2010

    Conference

    Conference6th International Conference on Innovation in Architecture, Engineering & Construction (AEC)
    Country/TerritoryUnited States
    CityState College
    Period9/06/1011/06/10

    Keywords

    • Capability maturity model
    • e-readiness
    • Construction
    • e-procurement

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Identification of key process areas in the production on an e-capability maturity model for UK construction organisations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this