Ideation, social construction and drug policy: A scoping review

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Within drug policy scholarship there is a growing body of literature applying ideational and social constructionist approaches to address the complexity of drug policy making and the apparent failure of the evidence-based policy paradigm to free the process from controversy and contestation. Ideational approaches are concerned with the roles played by ideas and beliefs in policy making, while social construction explores the way policy problems are constructed, and agendas are set and delineated by dominant frames and narratives. Interest in these approaches has developed over the last two decades, but has rapidly gained momentum over the last five years. There has been limited reflection on the state of the field, therefore it is timely to conduct a review of the literature to assess the value of these approaches, capture emerging themes and issues, and identify gaps in the literature to support future research directions. Using the Arksey and O’Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted to survey the breadth of the field. Following database and hand searching, 48 studies from 1996 to 2016 were selected for inclusion in the review. A narrative synthesis was undertaken and the literature was grouped into five broad theoretical approaches: ideational policy theory, problem construction, narratives and frames (including media analysis), construction of target populations, and policy transfer and mobilities. The majority of the studies are focused on single countries and drug policy issues, with few studies undertaking comparative work or reflecting on general theoretical developments in the literature. This study found that the Arksey and O’Malley framework was effective in capturing a potentially diverse field of literature and demonstrates the importance of ideational and social constructionist approaches to drug policy scholarship. Further research is required to achieve expanded geographic coverage, test policy making models and undertake comparative work.
LanguageEnglish
Pages75-86
JournalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY
Volume51
Early online date8 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Ideation
  • Social construction
  • Drug policy
  • Policy theory
  • Scoping review

Cite this

@article{d9537e699c8a4ce19acb0bb36370e21d,
title = "Ideation, social construction and drug policy: A scoping review",
abstract = "Within drug policy scholarship there is a growing body of literature applying ideational and social constructionist approaches to address the complexity of drug policy making and the apparent failure of the evidence-based policy paradigm to free the process from controversy and contestation. Ideational approaches are concerned with the roles played by ideas and beliefs in policy making, while social construction explores the way policy problems are constructed, and agendas are set and delineated by dominant frames and narratives. Interest in these approaches has developed over the last two decades, but has rapidly gained momentum over the last five years. There has been limited reflection on the state of the field, therefore it is timely to conduct a review of the literature to assess the value of these approaches, capture emerging themes and issues, and identify gaps in the literature to support future research directions. Using the Arksey and O’Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted to survey the breadth of the field. Following database and hand searching, 48 studies from 1996 to 2016 were selected for inclusion in the review. A narrative synthesis was undertaken and the literature was grouped into five broad theoretical approaches: ideational policy theory, problem construction, narratives and frames (including media analysis), construction of target populations, and policy transfer and mobilities. The majority of the studies are focused on single countries and drug policy issues, with few studies undertaking comparative work or reflecting on general theoretical developments in the literature. This study found that the Arksey and O’Malley framework was effective in capturing a potentially diverse field of literature and demonstrates the importance of ideational and social constructionist approaches to drug policy scholarship. Further research is required to achieve expanded geographic coverage, test policy making models and undertake comparative work.",
keywords = "Ideation, Social construction, Drug policy, Policy theory, Scoping review",
author = "Vanessa Gstrein",
note = "Compliant in UIR (id 39170); evidence uploaded to 'Other files'. For some reason this item didn't come through to PURE, possibly due to author being PhD student at the time, but exception set as PhD students did not have accounts for repository at that time.",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.10.011",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "75--86",
journal = "INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY",
issn = "0955-3959",

}

Ideation, social construction and drug policy: A scoping review. / Gstrein, Vanessa.

In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, Vol. 51, 31.01.2018, p. 75-86.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ideation, social construction and drug policy: A scoping review

AU - Gstrein, Vanessa

N1 - Compliant in UIR (id 39170); evidence uploaded to 'Other files'. For some reason this item didn't come through to PURE, possibly due to author being PhD student at the time, but exception set as PhD students did not have accounts for repository at that time.

PY - 2018/1/31

Y1 - 2018/1/31

N2 - Within drug policy scholarship there is a growing body of literature applying ideational and social constructionist approaches to address the complexity of drug policy making and the apparent failure of the evidence-based policy paradigm to free the process from controversy and contestation. Ideational approaches are concerned with the roles played by ideas and beliefs in policy making, while social construction explores the way policy problems are constructed, and agendas are set and delineated by dominant frames and narratives. Interest in these approaches has developed over the last two decades, but has rapidly gained momentum over the last five years. There has been limited reflection on the state of the field, therefore it is timely to conduct a review of the literature to assess the value of these approaches, capture emerging themes and issues, and identify gaps in the literature to support future research directions. Using the Arksey and O’Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted to survey the breadth of the field. Following database and hand searching, 48 studies from 1996 to 2016 were selected for inclusion in the review. A narrative synthesis was undertaken and the literature was grouped into five broad theoretical approaches: ideational policy theory, problem construction, narratives and frames (including media analysis), construction of target populations, and policy transfer and mobilities. The majority of the studies are focused on single countries and drug policy issues, with few studies undertaking comparative work or reflecting on general theoretical developments in the literature. This study found that the Arksey and O’Malley framework was effective in capturing a potentially diverse field of literature and demonstrates the importance of ideational and social constructionist approaches to drug policy scholarship. Further research is required to achieve expanded geographic coverage, test policy making models and undertake comparative work.

AB - Within drug policy scholarship there is a growing body of literature applying ideational and social constructionist approaches to address the complexity of drug policy making and the apparent failure of the evidence-based policy paradigm to free the process from controversy and contestation. Ideational approaches are concerned with the roles played by ideas and beliefs in policy making, while social construction explores the way policy problems are constructed, and agendas are set and delineated by dominant frames and narratives. Interest in these approaches has developed over the last two decades, but has rapidly gained momentum over the last five years. There has been limited reflection on the state of the field, therefore it is timely to conduct a review of the literature to assess the value of these approaches, capture emerging themes and issues, and identify gaps in the literature to support future research directions. Using the Arksey and O’Malley framework, a scoping review was conducted to survey the breadth of the field. Following database and hand searching, 48 studies from 1996 to 2016 were selected for inclusion in the review. A narrative synthesis was undertaken and the literature was grouped into five broad theoretical approaches: ideational policy theory, problem construction, narratives and frames (including media analysis), construction of target populations, and policy transfer and mobilities. The majority of the studies are focused on single countries and drug policy issues, with few studies undertaking comparative work or reflecting on general theoretical developments in the literature. This study found that the Arksey and O’Malley framework was effective in capturing a potentially diverse field of literature and demonstrates the importance of ideational and social constructionist approaches to drug policy scholarship. Further research is required to achieve expanded geographic coverage, test policy making models and undertake comparative work.

KW - Ideation

KW - Social construction

KW - Drug policy

KW - Policy theory

KW - Scoping review

UR - http://www.ijdp.org/article/S0955-3959(17)30331-6/fulltext

UR - https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/en/publications/ideation-social-construction-and-drug-policy-a-scoping-review

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.10.011

DO - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.10.011

M3 - Review article

VL - 51

SP - 75

EP - 86

JO - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY

T2 - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY

JF - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY

SN - 0955-3959

ER -