TY - JOUR
T1 - How do we prepare students for the challenges of social work? Examples from six countries around the world
AU - Tham, Pia
AU - Mc Fadden, Paula
AU - Russ, Erica
AU - Baldschun, Andreas
AU - Blakeman, Paul
AU - Griffiths, Austin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021/9/16
Y1 - 2021/9/16
N2 - In this paper we provide a descriptive comparison of the similarities and differences between social work education at six different universities situated in Australia, England, Finland, Northern Ireland, Sweden, and the United States. The aim was to begin an international conversation by examining the similarities and differences in these examples, around admissions and recruitment processes, professional training, and field practicum to prepare social work students for practice and to consider any implications that differing models of recruitment and training might have for the students’ preparedness for the challenges of social work. The findings reflect common characteristics relating to the curriculum, such as skills training, reflective practice and application of theory into practice. Differences include a range of approaches to professional regulation, admissions and selection, duration of courses and practicum during training. The complexities of trying to measure similarities and differences across diverse models of education are recognised, including the difficulties stemming from different factors being relevant in diverse geographic regions across diverse contexts. The authors suggest that starting an international discussion allows us to learn from one another and may serve as a catalyst for future progress in this area.
AB - In this paper we provide a descriptive comparison of the similarities and differences between social work education at six different universities situated in Australia, England, Finland, Northern Ireland, Sweden, and the United States. The aim was to begin an international conversation by examining the similarities and differences in these examples, around admissions and recruitment processes, professional training, and field practicum to prepare social work students for practice and to consider any implications that differing models of recruitment and training might have for the students’ preparedness for the challenges of social work. The findings reflect common characteristics relating to the curriculum, such as skills training, reflective practice and application of theory into practice. Differences include a range of approaches to professional regulation, admissions and selection, duration of courses and practicum during training. The complexities of trying to measure similarities and differences across diverse models of education are recognised, including the difficulties stemming from different factors being relevant in diverse geographic regions across diverse contexts. The authors suggest that starting an international discussion allows us to learn from one another and may serve as a catalyst for future progress in this area.
KW - Education
KW - Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
KW - newly educated social workers
KW - social work students
KW - readiness
KW - social work education
KW - Cross-country comparison
KW - transition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115119827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02615479.2021.1976135
DO - 10.1080/02615479.2021.1976135
M3 - Article
SN - 0261-5479
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - Social Work Education: The International Journal
JF - Social Work Education: The International Journal
ER -