Heuristics in professional judgement: A psycho-social rationality model

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is increasing attention to decision making in social work as we become more concerned about ‘risk’ and the most effective design of assessment tools to aid professional judgement. In order to develop practice, a better conceptual understanding is required of the cognitive processes in making these judgements. This paper explores the potential use of heuristic (small-scale, ‘rule-of-thumb’) models of cognitive judgement in social work, recognising that human beings (including social work professionals) cannot simultaneously process large numbers of factors with associated statistical weightings. This paper discusses heuristic models of professional judgement based on a proposed concept of psychosocial rationality. Such heuristic models would take account of the psychosocial environment in which the decision is being made as well as of the cognitive processes of the decision maker. The potential application to professional judgement in social work is discussed with reference to examples of various types of social work decision. Potential issues in developing and adopting this theoretical approach in practice are raised – including legal dimensions and potential bias - and the implications for social work research are discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1043-1060
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume47
Issue number4
Early online date9 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Social Work
rationality
heuristics
social work
work research
weighting
Heuristics
decision maker
Decision Making
decision making
human being
trend
Research

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • decision making
  • decision theory
  • evidence-based practice
  • professional judgement
  • reflective practice
  • risk
  • risk assessment
  • social work.

Cite this

@article{61842c01bcc04b3dba05d1131e7bbb9c,
title = "Heuristics in professional judgement: A psycho-social rationality model",
abstract = "There is increasing attention to decision making in social work as we become more concerned about ‘risk’ and the most effective design of assessment tools to aid professional judgement. In order to develop practice, a better conceptual understanding is required of the cognitive processes in making these judgements. This paper explores the potential use of heuristic (small-scale, ‘rule-of-thumb’) models of cognitive judgement in social work, recognising that human beings (including social work professionals) cannot simultaneously process large numbers of factors with associated statistical weightings. This paper discusses heuristic models of professional judgement based on a proposed concept of psychosocial rationality. Such heuristic models would take account of the psychosocial environment in which the decision is being made as well as of the cognitive processes of the decision maker. The potential application to professional judgement in social work is discussed with reference to examples of various types of social work decision. Potential issues in developing and adopting this theoretical approach in practice are raised – including legal dimensions and potential bias - and the implications for social work research are discussed.",
keywords = "Assessment, decision making, decision theory, evidence-based practice, professional judgement, reflective practice, risk, risk assessment, social work.",
author = "Taylor, {Brian J}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcw084",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1043--1060",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
number = "4",

}

Heuristics in professional judgement: A psycho-social rationality model. / Taylor, Brian J.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 47, No. 4, 01.06.2017, p. 1043-1060.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heuristics in professional judgement: A psycho-social rationality model

AU - Taylor, Brian J

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - There is increasing attention to decision making in social work as we become more concerned about ‘risk’ and the most effective design of assessment tools to aid professional judgement. In order to develop practice, a better conceptual understanding is required of the cognitive processes in making these judgements. This paper explores the potential use of heuristic (small-scale, ‘rule-of-thumb’) models of cognitive judgement in social work, recognising that human beings (including social work professionals) cannot simultaneously process large numbers of factors with associated statistical weightings. This paper discusses heuristic models of professional judgement based on a proposed concept of psychosocial rationality. Such heuristic models would take account of the psychosocial environment in which the decision is being made as well as of the cognitive processes of the decision maker. The potential application to professional judgement in social work is discussed with reference to examples of various types of social work decision. Potential issues in developing and adopting this theoretical approach in practice are raised – including legal dimensions and potential bias - and the implications for social work research are discussed.

AB - There is increasing attention to decision making in social work as we become more concerned about ‘risk’ and the most effective design of assessment tools to aid professional judgement. In order to develop practice, a better conceptual understanding is required of the cognitive processes in making these judgements. This paper explores the potential use of heuristic (small-scale, ‘rule-of-thumb’) models of cognitive judgement in social work, recognising that human beings (including social work professionals) cannot simultaneously process large numbers of factors with associated statistical weightings. This paper discusses heuristic models of professional judgement based on a proposed concept of psychosocial rationality. Such heuristic models would take account of the psychosocial environment in which the decision is being made as well as of the cognitive processes of the decision maker. The potential application to professional judgement in social work is discussed with reference to examples of various types of social work decision. Potential issues in developing and adopting this theoretical approach in practice are raised – including legal dimensions and potential bias - and the implications for social work research are discussed.

KW - Assessment

KW - decision making

KW - decision theory

KW - evidence-based practice

KW - professional judgement

KW - reflective practice

KW - risk

KW - risk assessment

KW - social work.

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcw084

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcw084

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 1043

EP - 1060

JO - British Journal of Social Work

T2 - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 4

ER -