Hammocking: The effect of cushion covers on interface pressure measurements

S.A. Crawford, Deirdre Walsh, Alison Porter-Armstrong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. To investigate the effects of the cushion covers on interface pressure measurements using pressure mappingtechnology.Methods. Sixty-one healthy participants were recruited for a laboratory-based study using a single group design. Participants were pressure mapped on a visco-elastic foam cushion and a foam and fluid pack cushion with their covers on and with their covers removed. An air-filled cushion was tested with two different types of covers, an incontinence cover anda ‘Comfair’ cover. Average and maximum pressures recorded at 6 mins by the Force Sensing Array pressure mapping system were used for statistical analysis.Results. There were no significant differences in maximum pressures for the three cushions tested with their covers on or with their covers removed. The cushion with the foam base and fluid pack did not demonstrate any significant differences inaverage pressure with the cover on or with the cover removed. However, the visco-elastic foam cushion showed significantly lower average pressures with the cover on (p¼0.019). The air-filled cushion showed lower average pressures with the incontinence cover on, when compared to the Comfair cover (p¼0.029).Conclusion. Contrary to the belief that the process of hammocking may create surface tension within the cushion covers, which in turn may adversely affect the cushions ability to reduce interface pressure, the cushions tested in the current study did not show significantly lower interface pressure measurements with the covers removed. Therefore the covers did not adversely affect the cushion’s ability to reduce interface pressure. The findings of this study require verification with disabled clients.
LanguageEnglish
Pages141-144
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
Volume1
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Pressure measurement
Pressure
Foams
Air
Fluids
Surface Tension
Surface tension
Statistical methods
Healthy Volunteers

Keywords

  • Interface Pressure
  • cushions
  • technology
  • rehabilitation
  • pressure ulcers

Cite this

@article{ef471981d7064343878939d6354e4eb3,
title = "Hammocking: The effect of cushion covers on interface pressure measurements",
abstract = "Purpose. To investigate the effects of the cushion covers on interface pressure measurements using pressure mappingtechnology.Methods. Sixty-one healthy participants were recruited for a laboratory-based study using a single group design. Participants were pressure mapped on a visco-elastic foam cushion and a foam and fluid pack cushion with their covers on and with their covers removed. An air-filled cushion was tested with two different types of covers, an incontinence cover anda ‘Comfair’ cover. Average and maximum pressures recorded at 6 mins by the Force Sensing Array pressure mapping system were used for statistical analysis.Results. There were no significant differences in maximum pressures for the three cushions tested with their covers on or with their covers removed. The cushion with the foam base and fluid pack did not demonstrate any significant differences inaverage pressure with the cover on or with the cover removed. However, the visco-elastic foam cushion showed significantly lower average pressures with the cover on (p¼0.019). The air-filled cushion showed lower average pressures with the incontinence cover on, when compared to the Comfair cover (p¼0.029).Conclusion. Contrary to the belief that the process of hammocking may create surface tension within the cushion covers, which in turn may adversely affect the cushions ability to reduce interface pressure, the cushions tested in the current study did not show significantly lower interface pressure measurements with the covers removed. Therefore the covers did not adversely affect the cushion’s ability to reduce interface pressure. The findings of this study require verification with disabled clients.",
keywords = "Interface Pressure, cushions, technology, rehabilitation, pressure ulcers",
author = "S.A. Crawford and Deirdre Walsh and Alison Porter-Armstrong",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09638280500167647",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "141--144",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology",
issn = "1748-3107",
number = "1-2",

}

Hammocking: The effect of cushion covers on interface pressure measurements. / Crawford, S.A.; Walsh, Deirdre; Porter-Armstrong, Alison.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1-2, 01.2006, p. 141-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hammocking: The effect of cushion covers on interface pressure measurements

AU - Crawford, S.A.

AU - Walsh, Deirdre

AU - Porter-Armstrong, Alison

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Purpose. To investigate the effects of the cushion covers on interface pressure measurements using pressure mappingtechnology.Methods. Sixty-one healthy participants were recruited for a laboratory-based study using a single group design. Participants were pressure mapped on a visco-elastic foam cushion and a foam and fluid pack cushion with their covers on and with their covers removed. An air-filled cushion was tested with two different types of covers, an incontinence cover anda ‘Comfair’ cover. Average and maximum pressures recorded at 6 mins by the Force Sensing Array pressure mapping system were used for statistical analysis.Results. There were no significant differences in maximum pressures for the three cushions tested with their covers on or with their covers removed. The cushion with the foam base and fluid pack did not demonstrate any significant differences inaverage pressure with the cover on or with the cover removed. However, the visco-elastic foam cushion showed significantly lower average pressures with the cover on (p¼0.019). The air-filled cushion showed lower average pressures with the incontinence cover on, when compared to the Comfair cover (p¼0.029).Conclusion. Contrary to the belief that the process of hammocking may create surface tension within the cushion covers, which in turn may adversely affect the cushions ability to reduce interface pressure, the cushions tested in the current study did not show significantly lower interface pressure measurements with the covers removed. Therefore the covers did not adversely affect the cushion’s ability to reduce interface pressure. The findings of this study require verification with disabled clients.

AB - Purpose. To investigate the effects of the cushion covers on interface pressure measurements using pressure mappingtechnology.Methods. Sixty-one healthy participants were recruited for a laboratory-based study using a single group design. Participants were pressure mapped on a visco-elastic foam cushion and a foam and fluid pack cushion with their covers on and with their covers removed. An air-filled cushion was tested with two different types of covers, an incontinence cover anda ‘Comfair’ cover. Average and maximum pressures recorded at 6 mins by the Force Sensing Array pressure mapping system were used for statistical analysis.Results. There were no significant differences in maximum pressures for the three cushions tested with their covers on or with their covers removed. The cushion with the foam base and fluid pack did not demonstrate any significant differences inaverage pressure with the cover on or with the cover removed. However, the visco-elastic foam cushion showed significantly lower average pressures with the cover on (p¼0.019). The air-filled cushion showed lower average pressures with the incontinence cover on, when compared to the Comfair cover (p¼0.029).Conclusion. Contrary to the belief that the process of hammocking may create surface tension within the cushion covers, which in turn may adversely affect the cushions ability to reduce interface pressure, the cushions tested in the current study did not show significantly lower interface pressure measurements with the covers removed. Therefore the covers did not adversely affect the cushion’s ability to reduce interface pressure. The findings of this study require verification with disabled clients.

KW - Interface Pressure

KW - cushions

KW - technology

KW - rehabilitation

KW - pressure ulcers

U2 - 10.1080/09638280500167647

DO - 10.1080/09638280500167647

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 141

EP - 144

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

T2 - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

SN - 1748-3107

IS - 1-2

ER -