Good art, bad art – what is a ‘good’ drawing?

Doris Rohr

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    56 Downloads (Pure)


    The article addresses subjectivity in relation to assessment of drawing as Fine Art practice within Higher Education contexts. How can we measure the quality of a drawing in contemporary Fine Art? What standards can one take recourse to, or use, to define boundaries and definitions for excellence? The role of outsider art, and of art not produced or valorised within institutional norms, is an area of tension within academic contexts. Do we overly valorise rejection of norms and traditions, or to the contrary, do we create neo-conformism in the way we teach drawing within Fine Art? This article asks to reconsider aesthetics as a potential way of redressing the need to build overarching standards and measuring codes, independent from agents and institutions which have become interested parties and stake holders: the curatorial function of museum and gallery, market forces, Research Council and Arts Council. A more meaningful dialogue with different types of public needs to be sought, to redress criticism that contemporary arts practices are elitist and removed from the realities of everyday life.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)11-26
    JournalVisual Enquiry: Learning & Teaching Art 2: 1
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013


    • aesthetics
    • drawing
    • subjectivity
    • beauty
    • outsider art


    Dive into the research topics of 'Good art, bad art – what is a ‘good’ drawing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this