Good art, bad art – what is a ‘good’ drawing?

Doris Rohr

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    114 Downloads (Pure)


    The article addresses subjectivity in relation to assessment of drawing as Fine Art practice within Higher Education contexts. How can we measure the quality of a drawing in contemporary Fine Art? What standards can one take recourse to, or use, to define boundaries and definitions for excellence? The role of outsider art, and of art not produced or valorised within institutional norms, is an area of tension within academic contexts. Do we overly valorise rejection of norms and traditions, or to the contrary, do we create neo-conformism in the way we teach drawing within Fine Art? This article asks to reconsider aesthetics as a potential way of redressing the need to build overarching standards and measuring codes, independent from agents and institutions which have become interested parties and stake holders: the curatorial function of museum and gallery, market forces, Research Council and Arts Council. A more meaningful dialogue with different types of public needs to be sought, to redress criticism that contemporary arts practices are elitist and removed from the realities of everyday life.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)11-26
    JournalVisual Enquiry: Learning & Teaching Art 2: 1
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - Apr 2013

    Bibliographical note

    Reference text: Arts and Humanities Research Council, accessed 1st September 2012.

    Association of Art Historians (2003) Working with Students with Disabilities London: AAH.

    Brand-Claussen, Jádi and Douglas (1998) Beyond Reason: Art and Psychosis: Works From the Prinzhorn Collection Berkeley, Calif., University of California Press in association with the Hayward Gallery, London.

    Doubal, Rosalie The List 5th June 2008 (Issue 604) accessed 6th February 2013.

    Edwards, Betty (1989) Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain New York: Tarcher/Putnam.

    Fetter, Bette 24th January (2013) Being Visual: Raising a Generation of Innovative Thinkers accessed 6th February 2013.

    Gordon Graham (1997) Philosophy of the Arts: An Introduction to Aesthetics London: Routledge.

    Jay, Martin (1993) Downcast Eyes: the Denigration of Vision in 20th Century French Thought London: University of California Press.

    Jenkins, David Fraser (ed) (2004) Gwen John and August John London: Tate Publishing.

    Kant , Immanuel (2007) [1790] Critique of Judgement Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Moriarity, Lesa (2007) Art Brut Education Kit (accessed 6th February 2013).

    Leaver-Yap (2007) ‘Lucy Skaer: Drawing Close’ in Map 10, 30 May 2007

    Paterson, Mark (2007) The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies, Oxford: Berg.

    Pattison, Stephen (2008) Seeing Things: Deepening Relations with Visual Artefacts. London: SCM Press.

    Raw Vision Magazine (2013) accessed 6th February 2013.

    Rothenberg, David (2011) Survival of the Beautiful, London: Bloomsbury.

    Tate Gallery (2009) London (accessed 6th February 2013)


    • aesthetics
    • drawing
    • subjectivity
    • beauty
    • outsider art


    Dive into the research topics of 'Good art, bad art – what is a ‘good’ drawing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this