Abstract
The aim of this article is to contribute to the debate on emergency rule, a practice that democratic theory has struggled to conceptualize. Accordingly, this article differs from existing approaches, which mainly focus on the constitutional design of regimes of exception and tend to identify the institution of the Roman dictator as their source. In contrast, we offer a comprehensive approach, considering other historical sources of emergency rule, going beyond the dichotomy of constitutional and de facto emergency, and focusing specifically on the types of emergency powers involved: executive, legislative and judicial. We propose a different way of conceptualizing emergency rule, following a political rather than a constitutional logic, and we illustrate this different conceptualization by offering evidence from Bolivia, Chile and Guatemala to demonstrate how this comprehensive approach works in practice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 713-734 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Democratization |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 20 Dec 2011 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 1 Aug 2012 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright: Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.Keywords
- Constitution
- Democracy
- Emergency
- Executive
- Judicial
- Latin america
- Legislative
- Political theory