Girls and Boys

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article looks at the case of Corbett v Corbett, the founding case for the law on transsexuality in the UK, which denied marriage rights to transsexuals because they were not of 'opposite biological sex', and which provoked the passage of the Marriage Act 1971 in which was enshrined this notion of biological opposition as a prerequisite for legal marriage. The article examines the formal construction of this case and how legitimacy was conceptually constructed for the eventual pronouncement on sexual identity. It seeks, therefore, to lay bare the founding moment of law on transsexuality in the UK, in all its paradoxical self-concealing ignominity.
LanguageEnglish
Pages25-43
JournalLaw and Critique
Volume15
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

marriage
Law
legitimacy
opposition
act

Cite this

McNamee, Eugene. / Girls and Boys. In: Law and Critique. 2004 ; Vol. 15. pp. 25-43.
@article{6d499e2bab8240a284d5b8e49bffec46,
title = "Girls and Boys",
abstract = "This article looks at the case of Corbett v Corbett, the founding case for the law on transsexuality in the UK, which denied marriage rights to transsexuals because they were not of 'opposite biological sex', and which provoked the passage of the Marriage Act 1971 in which was enshrined this notion of biological opposition as a prerequisite for legal marriage. The article examines the formal construction of this case and how legitimacy was conceptually constructed for the eventual pronouncement on sexual identity. It seeks, therefore, to lay bare the founding moment of law on transsexuality in the UK, in all its paradoxical self-concealing ignominity.",
author = "Eugene McNamee",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "25--43",
journal = "Law and Critique",
issn = "0957-8536",

}

McNamee, E 2004, 'Girls and Boys', Law and Critique, vol. 15, pp. 25-43.

Girls and Boys. / McNamee, Eugene.

In: Law and Critique, Vol. 15, 2004, p. 25-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Girls and Boys

AU - McNamee, Eugene

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This article looks at the case of Corbett v Corbett, the founding case for the law on transsexuality in the UK, which denied marriage rights to transsexuals because they were not of 'opposite biological sex', and which provoked the passage of the Marriage Act 1971 in which was enshrined this notion of biological opposition as a prerequisite for legal marriage. The article examines the formal construction of this case and how legitimacy was conceptually constructed for the eventual pronouncement on sexual identity. It seeks, therefore, to lay bare the founding moment of law on transsexuality in the UK, in all its paradoxical self-concealing ignominity.

AB - This article looks at the case of Corbett v Corbett, the founding case for the law on transsexuality in the UK, which denied marriage rights to transsexuals because they were not of 'opposite biological sex', and which provoked the passage of the Marriage Act 1971 in which was enshrined this notion of biological opposition as a prerequisite for legal marriage. The article examines the formal construction of this case and how legitimacy was conceptually constructed for the eventual pronouncement on sexual identity. It seeks, therefore, to lay bare the founding moment of law on transsexuality in the UK, in all its paradoxical self-concealing ignominity.

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 25

EP - 43

JO - Law and Critique

T2 - Law and Critique

JF - Law and Critique

SN - 0957-8536

ER -