Genetic consultations in primary care: GPs' responses to three scenarios

S McCann, D MacAuley, Y Barnett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. This study investigated general practitioners' responses to three scenarios in which patients consulted regarding genetic conditions. Design. Self-completed postal study. Setting. Primary care in Northern Ireland. Subjects. Questionnaire were distributed to all the GPs in Northern Ireland (n=1079). A total of 541 GPs participated (50%). Main outcome measures. Responses to three scenarios in which patients consulted regarding their family history and risk of bowel cancer, breast cancer, and cystic fibrosis. Results. Most GPs correctly identified the patients' risk of bowel cancer, recommended regular colonoscopy, advised lifestyle changes, and did not refer to the genetic clinic. GPs who were qualified for longer were more likely to recommend colonoscopy and less likely to advise lifestyle changes. With the breast cancer patient GPs adopted a cautious approach; most would refer to the genetic and mammography clinics. With the cystic fibrosis example, most correctly identified the patient's risk of carrying the gene, would refer to the genetic clinic, and would encourage the patient to discuss the risk with his partner. In general, doctors were unsure, but would pass on genetic information to insurance companies if requested. Conclusion. The study suggests that, in most cases, general practitioners correctly identify at-risk individuals but there may still be some uncertainty regarding referrals. The results suggest that ways of educating GPs should be explored. Educational interventions should be linked to a greater understanding of factors involved in referral (including the influence of gender and experience). The guidelines provided to GPs in relation to the provision of genetic information to insurance companies may need to be reviewed in some countries.
LanguageEnglish
Pages109-114
JournalScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2005

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Referral and Consultation
Northern Ireland
Colonoscopy
Breast Neoplasms
Insurance
Cystic Fibrosis
Colonic Neoplasms
General Practitioners
Life Style
Mammography
Uncertainty
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Guidelines
Genes

Cite this

@article{a23371c37f4b4417a9bfd3e55dae5c92,
title = "Genetic consultations in primary care: GPs' responses to three scenarios",
abstract = "Objective. This study investigated general practitioners' responses to three scenarios in which patients consulted regarding genetic conditions. Design. Self-completed postal study. Setting. Primary care in Northern Ireland. Subjects. Questionnaire were distributed to all the GPs in Northern Ireland (n=1079). A total of 541 GPs participated (50{\%}). Main outcome measures. Responses to three scenarios in which patients consulted regarding their family history and risk of bowel cancer, breast cancer, and cystic fibrosis. Results. Most GPs correctly identified the patients' risk of bowel cancer, recommended regular colonoscopy, advised lifestyle changes, and did not refer to the genetic clinic. GPs who were qualified for longer were more likely to recommend colonoscopy and less likely to advise lifestyle changes. With the breast cancer patient GPs adopted a cautious approach; most would refer to the genetic and mammography clinics. With the cystic fibrosis example, most correctly identified the patient's risk of carrying the gene, would refer to the genetic clinic, and would encourage the patient to discuss the risk with his partner. In general, doctors were unsure, but would pass on genetic information to insurance companies if requested. Conclusion. The study suggests that, in most cases, general practitioners correctly identify at-risk individuals but there may still be some uncertainty regarding referrals. The results suggest that ways of educating GPs should be explored. Educational interventions should be linked to a greater understanding of factors involved in referral (including the influence of gender and experience). The guidelines provided to GPs in relation to the provision of genetic information to insurance companies may need to be reviewed in some countries.",
author = "S McCann and D MacAuley and Y Barnett",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/02813430510015259",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "109--114",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care",
issn = "0281-3432",
number = "2",

}

Genetic consultations in primary care: GPs' responses to three scenarios. / McCann, S; MacAuley, D; Barnett, Y.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol. 23, No. 2, 06.2005, p. 109-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetic consultations in primary care: GPs' responses to three scenarios

AU - McCann, S

AU - MacAuley, D

AU - Barnett, Y

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Objective. This study investigated general practitioners' responses to three scenarios in which patients consulted regarding genetic conditions. Design. Self-completed postal study. Setting. Primary care in Northern Ireland. Subjects. Questionnaire were distributed to all the GPs in Northern Ireland (n=1079). A total of 541 GPs participated (50%). Main outcome measures. Responses to three scenarios in which patients consulted regarding their family history and risk of bowel cancer, breast cancer, and cystic fibrosis. Results. Most GPs correctly identified the patients' risk of bowel cancer, recommended regular colonoscopy, advised lifestyle changes, and did not refer to the genetic clinic. GPs who were qualified for longer were more likely to recommend colonoscopy and less likely to advise lifestyle changes. With the breast cancer patient GPs adopted a cautious approach; most would refer to the genetic and mammography clinics. With the cystic fibrosis example, most correctly identified the patient's risk of carrying the gene, would refer to the genetic clinic, and would encourage the patient to discuss the risk with his partner. In general, doctors were unsure, but would pass on genetic information to insurance companies if requested. Conclusion. The study suggests that, in most cases, general practitioners correctly identify at-risk individuals but there may still be some uncertainty regarding referrals. The results suggest that ways of educating GPs should be explored. Educational interventions should be linked to a greater understanding of factors involved in referral (including the influence of gender and experience). The guidelines provided to GPs in relation to the provision of genetic information to insurance companies may need to be reviewed in some countries.

AB - Objective. This study investigated general practitioners' responses to three scenarios in which patients consulted regarding genetic conditions. Design. Self-completed postal study. Setting. Primary care in Northern Ireland. Subjects. Questionnaire were distributed to all the GPs in Northern Ireland (n=1079). A total of 541 GPs participated (50%). Main outcome measures. Responses to three scenarios in which patients consulted regarding their family history and risk of bowel cancer, breast cancer, and cystic fibrosis. Results. Most GPs correctly identified the patients' risk of bowel cancer, recommended regular colonoscopy, advised lifestyle changes, and did not refer to the genetic clinic. GPs who were qualified for longer were more likely to recommend colonoscopy and less likely to advise lifestyle changes. With the breast cancer patient GPs adopted a cautious approach; most would refer to the genetic and mammography clinics. With the cystic fibrosis example, most correctly identified the patient's risk of carrying the gene, would refer to the genetic clinic, and would encourage the patient to discuss the risk with his partner. In general, doctors were unsure, but would pass on genetic information to insurance companies if requested. Conclusion. The study suggests that, in most cases, general practitioners correctly identify at-risk individuals but there may still be some uncertainty regarding referrals. The results suggest that ways of educating GPs should be explored. Educational interventions should be linked to a greater understanding of factors involved in referral (including the influence of gender and experience). The guidelines provided to GPs in relation to the provision of genetic information to insurance companies may need to be reviewed in some countries.

U2 - 10.1080/02813430510015259

DO - 10.1080/02813430510015259

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 109

EP - 114

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

T2 - Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

SN - 0281-3432

IS - 2

ER -