General Practitioners involvement in enteral tube feeding at home: a qualitative study

Sharon M. Madigan, Paul Fleming, Siobhan McCann, Marion E. Wright, Domhnall MacAuley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Complex medical treatment is moving from hospital to primary care and General Practitioners (GPs) are increasingly asked to undertake new roles. There are now an estimated 19,500 patients being fed in the UK in the community on enteral tube feeding using a variety of different feeding tubes ( Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy ( PEG), Jejunostomy, or nasogastric (NG). The majority of patients are over the age of 65 years when they had artificial feeding initiated and mainly because of dysphagia. The aim of this study was to explore GPs knowledge, attitudes and skills relating to enteral feeding in the community. Methods: Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with a convenience sample of GPs in Northern Ireland. Results: Twenty-three GPs in three health boards in Northern Ireland participated in the study. Most found dealing with enteral feeding to be a predominantly negative experience. They had little involvement in patient selection for the procedure and poor or no discharge information. GPs felt inadequately trained, there was poor communication between primary and secondary care and little support. There was anger and frustration among GPs about lack of resources ( funding and training), and the perception that primary care was used as a dumping ground. Conclusion: Moving complex medical treatment from secondary to primary care has major implications for GPs who should be included in the patient selection process, have adequate discharge information about their patients, be adequately resourced and have appropriate support and training.
LanguageEnglish
Pages29
JournalBMC Family Practice
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Enteral Nutrition
General Practitioners
Primary Health Care
Northern Ireland
Patient Selection
Health Facility Moving
Jejunostomy
Training Support
Secondary Care
Frustration
Gastrostomy
Nutritional Support
Anger
Deglutition Disorders
Communication
Interviews
Health
Therapeutics

Cite this

Madigan, Sharon M. ; Fleming, Paul ; McCann, Siobhan ; Wright, Marion E. ; MacAuley, Domhnall. / General Practitioners involvement in enteral tube feeding at home: a qualitative study. In: BMC Family Practice. 2007 ; Vol. 8. pp. 29.
@article{55b78d04faf74ccd9507f31b0141971a,
title = "General Practitioners involvement in enteral tube feeding at home: a qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: Complex medical treatment is moving from hospital to primary care and General Practitioners (GPs) are increasingly asked to undertake new roles. There are now an estimated 19,500 patients being fed in the UK in the community on enteral tube feeding using a variety of different feeding tubes ( Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy ( PEG), Jejunostomy, or nasogastric (NG). The majority of patients are over the age of 65 years when they had artificial feeding initiated and mainly because of dysphagia. The aim of this study was to explore GPs knowledge, attitudes and skills relating to enteral feeding in the community. Methods: Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with a convenience sample of GPs in Northern Ireland. Results: Twenty-three GPs in three health boards in Northern Ireland participated in the study. Most found dealing with enteral feeding to be a predominantly negative experience. They had little involvement in patient selection for the procedure and poor or no discharge information. GPs felt inadequately trained, there was poor communication between primary and secondary care and little support. There was anger and frustration among GPs about lack of resources ( funding and training), and the perception that primary care was used as a dumping ground. Conclusion: Moving complex medical treatment from secondary to primary care has major implications for GPs who should be included in the patient selection process, have adequate discharge information about their patients, be adequately resourced and have appropriate support and training.",
author = "Madigan, {Sharon M.} and Paul Fleming and Siobhan McCann and Wright, {Marion E.} and Domhnall MacAuley",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2296-8-29",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "29",
journal = "BMC Family Practice",
issn = "1471-2296",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

General Practitioners involvement in enteral tube feeding at home: a qualitative study. / Madigan, Sharon M.; Fleming, Paul; McCann, Siobhan; Wright, Marion E.; MacAuley, Domhnall.

In: BMC Family Practice, Vol. 8, 05.2007, p. 29.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - General Practitioners involvement in enteral tube feeding at home: a qualitative study

AU - Madigan, Sharon M.

AU - Fleming, Paul

AU - McCann, Siobhan

AU - Wright, Marion E.

AU - MacAuley, Domhnall

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Background: Complex medical treatment is moving from hospital to primary care and General Practitioners (GPs) are increasingly asked to undertake new roles. There are now an estimated 19,500 patients being fed in the UK in the community on enteral tube feeding using a variety of different feeding tubes ( Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy ( PEG), Jejunostomy, or nasogastric (NG). The majority of patients are over the age of 65 years when they had artificial feeding initiated and mainly because of dysphagia. The aim of this study was to explore GPs knowledge, attitudes and skills relating to enteral feeding in the community. Methods: Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with a convenience sample of GPs in Northern Ireland. Results: Twenty-three GPs in three health boards in Northern Ireland participated in the study. Most found dealing with enteral feeding to be a predominantly negative experience. They had little involvement in patient selection for the procedure and poor or no discharge information. GPs felt inadequately trained, there was poor communication between primary and secondary care and little support. There was anger and frustration among GPs about lack of resources ( funding and training), and the perception that primary care was used as a dumping ground. Conclusion: Moving complex medical treatment from secondary to primary care has major implications for GPs who should be included in the patient selection process, have adequate discharge information about their patients, be adequately resourced and have appropriate support and training.

AB - Background: Complex medical treatment is moving from hospital to primary care and General Practitioners (GPs) are increasingly asked to undertake new roles. There are now an estimated 19,500 patients being fed in the UK in the community on enteral tube feeding using a variety of different feeding tubes ( Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy ( PEG), Jejunostomy, or nasogastric (NG). The majority of patients are over the age of 65 years when they had artificial feeding initiated and mainly because of dysphagia. The aim of this study was to explore GPs knowledge, attitudes and skills relating to enteral feeding in the community. Methods: Semi-structured one-to-one interviews with a convenience sample of GPs in Northern Ireland. Results: Twenty-three GPs in three health boards in Northern Ireland participated in the study. Most found dealing with enteral feeding to be a predominantly negative experience. They had little involvement in patient selection for the procedure and poor or no discharge information. GPs felt inadequately trained, there was poor communication between primary and secondary care and little support. There was anger and frustration among GPs about lack of resources ( funding and training), and the perception that primary care was used as a dumping ground. Conclusion: Moving complex medical treatment from secondary to primary care has major implications for GPs who should be included in the patient selection process, have adequate discharge information about their patients, be adequately resourced and have appropriate support and training.

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2296-8-29

DO - 10.1186/1471-2296-8-29

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 29

JO - BMC Family Practice

T2 - BMC Family Practice

JF - BMC Family Practice

SN - 1471-2296

ER -