Gendering Political Settlements: Challenges and Opportunities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whereas the political settlements research framework is garnering growing policy attention in development programming, including in fragile and conflict-affected states, there are concerns that political settlements constitute yet another global policy development with which feminist and gender analysis must ‘catch up’. The article outlines four broad challenges to advancing gender analysis through the political settlements framework. The first is conceptual, that the focus on elites, and the reliance on public sphere dynamics to explain development outcomes, structurally excludes women. The second is epistemological, that the role of the scholar in designating certain groups to be ‘elites’ and others to be ‘non-elites’ merits further interrogation. The third is methodological, that due to other exclusions, gender is infrequently identified as a pertinent variable or category of analysis in seeking to explain development outcomes through the political settlements framework. The final is political, that the avowedly non-normative position of political settlements analysis risks overlooking norms implicit to the work, in particular implicit gender norms. Nevertheless, the article argues, in the prevailing context of technocratic approaches to global gender policy-making, the political settlements framework may offer promise through its avowed focus on ‘doing politics’. Moreover, the political settlements framework may usefully counter the tendency of global gender policy to essentialise the state as a single domain of activity, and to instead utilize more fully the different constituencies within the state, and the relationships between them, in order to effect positive change.
LanguageEnglish
Pages594-612
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of International Development
Volume29
Early online date6 Jul 2017
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

gender policy
gender
elite
community research
development policy
exclusion
programming
politics
Group

Keywords

  • Political Settlements
  • Gender
  • Elites
  • Social Movements
  • International Law

Cite this

@article{9584ec783f2b4ee4ac8abd3554600b09,
title = "Gendering Political Settlements: Challenges and Opportunities",
abstract = "Whereas the political settlements research framework is garnering growing policy attention in development programming, including in fragile and conflict-affected states, there are concerns that political settlements constitute yet another global policy development with which feminist and gender analysis must ‘catch up’. The article outlines four broad challenges to advancing gender analysis through the political settlements framework. The first is conceptual, that the focus on elites, and the reliance on public sphere dynamics to explain development outcomes, structurally excludes women. The second is epistemological, that the role of the scholar in designating certain groups to be ‘elites’ and others to be ‘non-elites’ merits further interrogation. The third is methodological, that due to other exclusions, gender is infrequently identified as a pertinent variable or category of analysis in seeking to explain development outcomes through the political settlements framework. The final is political, that the avowedly non-normative position of political settlements analysis risks overlooking norms implicit to the work, in particular implicit gender norms. Nevertheless, the article argues, in the prevailing context of technocratic approaches to global gender policy-making, the political settlements framework may offer promise through its avowed focus on ‘doing politics’. Moreover, the political settlements framework may usefully counter the tendency of global gender policy to essentialise the state as a single domain of activity, and to instead utilize more fully the different constituencies within the state, and the relationships between them, in order to effect positive change.",
keywords = "Political Settlements, Gender, Elites, Social Movements, International Law",
author = "Catherine O'Rourke",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "594--612",
journal = "Journal of International Development",
issn = "0954-1748",

}

Gendering Political Settlements: Challenges and Opportunities. / O'Rourke, Catherine.

In: Journal of International Development, Vol. 29, 06.07.2017, p. 594-612.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gendering Political Settlements: Challenges and Opportunities

AU - O'Rourke, Catherine

PY - 2017/7/6

Y1 - 2017/7/6

N2 - Whereas the political settlements research framework is garnering growing policy attention in development programming, including in fragile and conflict-affected states, there are concerns that political settlements constitute yet another global policy development with which feminist and gender analysis must ‘catch up’. The article outlines four broad challenges to advancing gender analysis through the political settlements framework. The first is conceptual, that the focus on elites, and the reliance on public sphere dynamics to explain development outcomes, structurally excludes women. The second is epistemological, that the role of the scholar in designating certain groups to be ‘elites’ and others to be ‘non-elites’ merits further interrogation. The third is methodological, that due to other exclusions, gender is infrequently identified as a pertinent variable or category of analysis in seeking to explain development outcomes through the political settlements framework. The final is political, that the avowedly non-normative position of political settlements analysis risks overlooking norms implicit to the work, in particular implicit gender norms. Nevertheless, the article argues, in the prevailing context of technocratic approaches to global gender policy-making, the political settlements framework may offer promise through its avowed focus on ‘doing politics’. Moreover, the political settlements framework may usefully counter the tendency of global gender policy to essentialise the state as a single domain of activity, and to instead utilize more fully the different constituencies within the state, and the relationships between them, in order to effect positive change.

AB - Whereas the political settlements research framework is garnering growing policy attention in development programming, including in fragile and conflict-affected states, there are concerns that political settlements constitute yet another global policy development with which feminist and gender analysis must ‘catch up’. The article outlines four broad challenges to advancing gender analysis through the political settlements framework. The first is conceptual, that the focus on elites, and the reliance on public sphere dynamics to explain development outcomes, structurally excludes women. The second is epistemological, that the role of the scholar in designating certain groups to be ‘elites’ and others to be ‘non-elites’ merits further interrogation. The third is methodological, that due to other exclusions, gender is infrequently identified as a pertinent variable or category of analysis in seeking to explain development outcomes through the political settlements framework. The final is political, that the avowedly non-normative position of political settlements analysis risks overlooking norms implicit to the work, in particular implicit gender norms. Nevertheless, the article argues, in the prevailing context of technocratic approaches to global gender policy-making, the political settlements framework may offer promise through its avowed focus on ‘doing politics’. Moreover, the political settlements framework may usefully counter the tendency of global gender policy to essentialise the state as a single domain of activity, and to instead utilize more fully the different constituencies within the state, and the relationships between them, in order to effect positive change.

KW - Political Settlements

KW - Gender

KW - Elites

KW - Social Movements

KW - International Law

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 594

EP - 612

JO - Journal of International Development

T2 - Journal of International Development

JF - Journal of International Development

SN - 0954-1748

ER -