Gender ,citizenship and welfare state regimes in the early twenty-first century: 'incomplete revolution' and/or gender equality 'lost in translation'

Julia S O'Connor

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This chapter examines the contested concepts of gender, citizenship and welfare state regimes as they relate to one another in the literature analysing redistribution and social service production and provision over the past couple of decades. The analysis unfolds from the centrality of citizenship rights, especially social rights, in welfare state development to a discussion of the gendered analysis of citizenship as rights and citizenship as obligation traditions. It argues that they are complementary and that both are essential to a realistic and effective analysis of welfare states in terms of the quality of social rights and the bases of stratification on which they are structured. The gender-sensitive critique of citizenship and welfare state regimes points to the pivotal role of the family in the state, market, family triadic division of responsibility for services and benefits, in the reconciliation of labour market participation and the care of dependent people in contemporary welfare states. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the second part of the title, which summarizes two perspectives on the current policy context within which gender, citizenship and welfare regimes are discussed. The contrasting messages of an ‘incomplete revolution’ in relation to women’s roles and the ‘loss in translation’ of gender egalitarian strategies into the gender awareness reflect some of the key issues considered in this chapter. It concludes that gender, citizenship and welfare state regimes continue to be contested concepts but they are now the subject of intense theoretical and empirical analysis that is yielding significant insights into the comparative analysis of welfare states, in particular the variation in the range and quality of social rights. Not only do welfare state regimes differ in the primacy they accord to the state, the market and the family, a particular welfare state may differ in the primacy accorded across particular policy areas.
    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationA Handbook of Comparative Social Policy Second Edition
    EditorsPatricia Kennett
    Place of PublicationCheltenham, UK
    Pages137-161
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    welfare state
    twenty-first century
    equality
    citizenship
    gender
    social rights
    women's role
    policy area
    market
    redistribution
    reconciliation
    mobile social services
    obligation
    labor market
    welfare
    responsibility
    participation

    Cite this

    O'Connor, J. S. (2013). Gender ,citizenship and welfare state regimes in the early twenty-first century: 'incomplete revolution' and/or gender equality 'lost in translation'. In P. Kennett (Ed.), A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy Second Edition (pp. 137-161). Cheltenham, UK.
    O'Connor, Julia S. / Gender ,citizenship and welfare state regimes in the early twenty-first century: 'incomplete revolution' and/or gender equality 'lost in translation'. A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy Second Edition. editor / Patricia Kennett. Cheltenham, UK, 2013. pp. 137-161
    @inbook{895b985459c94984a99dc44fbcf809f9,
    title = "Gender ,citizenship and welfare state regimes in the early twenty-first century: 'incomplete revolution' and/or gender equality 'lost in translation'",
    abstract = "This chapter examines the contested concepts of gender, citizenship and welfare state regimes as they relate to one another in the literature analysing redistribution and social service production and provision over the past couple of decades. The analysis unfolds from the centrality of citizenship rights, especially social rights, in welfare state development to a discussion of the gendered analysis of citizenship as rights and citizenship as obligation traditions. It argues that they are complementary and that both are essential to a realistic and effective analysis of welfare states in terms of the quality of social rights and the bases of stratification on which they are structured. The gender-sensitive critique of citizenship and welfare state regimes points to the pivotal role of the family in the state, market, family triadic division of responsibility for services and benefits, in the reconciliation of labour market participation and the care of dependent people in contemporary welfare states. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the second part of the title, which summarizes two perspectives on the current policy context within which gender, citizenship and welfare regimes are discussed. The contrasting messages of an ‘incomplete revolution’ in relation to women’s roles and the ‘loss in translation’ of gender egalitarian strategies into the gender awareness reflect some of the key issues considered in this chapter. It concludes that gender, citizenship and welfare state regimes continue to be contested concepts but they are now the subject of intense theoretical and empirical analysis that is yielding significant insights into the comparative analysis of welfare states, in particular the variation in the range and quality of social rights. Not only do welfare state regimes differ in the primacy they accord to the state, the market and the family, a particular welfare state may differ in the primacy accorded across particular policy areas.",
    author = "O'Connor, {Julia S}",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978 1 78254 653 5",
    pages = "137--161",
    editor = "Patricia Kennett",
    booktitle = "A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy Second Edition",

    }

    O'Connor, JS 2013, Gender ,citizenship and welfare state regimes in the early twenty-first century: 'incomplete revolution' and/or gender equality 'lost in translation'. in P Kennett (ed.), A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy Second Edition. Cheltenham, UK, pp. 137-161.

    Gender ,citizenship and welfare state regimes in the early twenty-first century: 'incomplete revolution' and/or gender equality 'lost in translation'. / O'Connor, Julia S.

    A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy Second Edition. ed. / Patricia Kennett. Cheltenham, UK, 2013. p. 137-161.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Gender ,citizenship and welfare state regimes in the early twenty-first century: 'incomplete revolution' and/or gender equality 'lost in translation'

    AU - O'Connor, Julia S

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - This chapter examines the contested concepts of gender, citizenship and welfare state regimes as they relate to one another in the literature analysing redistribution and social service production and provision over the past couple of decades. The analysis unfolds from the centrality of citizenship rights, especially social rights, in welfare state development to a discussion of the gendered analysis of citizenship as rights and citizenship as obligation traditions. It argues that they are complementary and that both are essential to a realistic and effective analysis of welfare states in terms of the quality of social rights and the bases of stratification on which they are structured. The gender-sensitive critique of citizenship and welfare state regimes points to the pivotal role of the family in the state, market, family triadic division of responsibility for services and benefits, in the reconciliation of labour market participation and the care of dependent people in contemporary welfare states. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the second part of the title, which summarizes two perspectives on the current policy context within which gender, citizenship and welfare regimes are discussed. The contrasting messages of an ‘incomplete revolution’ in relation to women’s roles and the ‘loss in translation’ of gender egalitarian strategies into the gender awareness reflect some of the key issues considered in this chapter. It concludes that gender, citizenship and welfare state regimes continue to be contested concepts but they are now the subject of intense theoretical and empirical analysis that is yielding significant insights into the comparative analysis of welfare states, in particular the variation in the range and quality of social rights. Not only do welfare state regimes differ in the primacy they accord to the state, the market and the family, a particular welfare state may differ in the primacy accorded across particular policy areas.

    AB - This chapter examines the contested concepts of gender, citizenship and welfare state regimes as they relate to one another in the literature analysing redistribution and social service production and provision over the past couple of decades. The analysis unfolds from the centrality of citizenship rights, especially social rights, in welfare state development to a discussion of the gendered analysis of citizenship as rights and citizenship as obligation traditions. It argues that they are complementary and that both are essential to a realistic and effective analysis of welfare states in terms of the quality of social rights and the bases of stratification on which they are structured. The gender-sensitive critique of citizenship and welfare state regimes points to the pivotal role of the family in the state, market, family triadic division of responsibility for services and benefits, in the reconciliation of labour market participation and the care of dependent people in contemporary welfare states. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the second part of the title, which summarizes two perspectives on the current policy context within which gender, citizenship and welfare regimes are discussed. The contrasting messages of an ‘incomplete revolution’ in relation to women’s roles and the ‘loss in translation’ of gender egalitarian strategies into the gender awareness reflect some of the key issues considered in this chapter. It concludes that gender, citizenship and welfare state regimes continue to be contested concepts but they are now the subject of intense theoretical and empirical analysis that is yielding significant insights into the comparative analysis of welfare states, in particular the variation in the range and quality of social rights. Not only do welfare state regimes differ in the primacy they accord to the state, the market and the family, a particular welfare state may differ in the primacy accorded across particular policy areas.

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 978 1 78254 653 5

    SP - 137

    EP - 161

    BT - A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy Second Edition

    A2 - Kennett, Patricia

    CY - Cheltenham, UK

    ER -

    O'Connor JS. Gender ,citizenship and welfare state regimes in the early twenty-first century: 'incomplete revolution' and/or gender equality 'lost in translation'. In Kennett P, editor, A Handbook of Comparative Social Policy Second Edition. Cheltenham, UK. 2013. p. 137-161