Gender and Swearing: A Community Practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that the gender-swearing relationship is more complex and context-specific than has been supposed. We adopted a 'communities of practice' framework to contextualize the linguistic practice of swearing and to explore the meanings of this practice for one particular 'community, ' a group of undergraduate drinking friends. Through members' accounts, we can observe their negotiation of specific linguistic categories, and their ongoing (re)definition of 'bad language' as a resource for identity construction. These findings provide insights into the ways in which gender itself becomes redefined and contextualized within particular frames of reference. Both female and male participants reported habitually deploying strong language in the context of shared group enterprises, although a number of subtle, yet persistent gender differences reflect the respondents' location within the wider sociocultural context(s).
LanguageEnglish
Pages22-33
JournalWomen and Language
Volume26
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

gender
community
linguistics
language
gender-specific factors
Group
resources

Cite this

@article{8d071ed063a74a099888053c1dac9073,
title = "Gender and Swearing: A Community Practice",
abstract = "Recent studies have shown that the gender-swearing relationship is more complex and context-specific than has been supposed. We adopted a 'communities of practice' framework to contextualize the linguistic practice of swearing and to explore the meanings of this practice for one particular 'community, ' a group of undergraduate drinking friends. Through members' accounts, we can observe their negotiation of specific linguistic categories, and their ongoing (re)definition of 'bad language' as a resource for identity construction. These findings provide insights into the ways in which gender itself becomes redefined and contextualized within particular frames of reference. Both female and male participants reported habitually deploying strong language in the context of shared group enterprises, although a number of subtle, yet persistent gender differences reflect the respondents' location within the wider sociocultural context(s).",
author = "Karyn Stapleton",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "22--33",
journal = "Women and Language",
issn = "8755-4550",
number = "2",

}

Gender and Swearing: A Community Practice. / Stapleton, Karyn.

In: Women and Language, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2003, p. 22-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender and Swearing: A Community Practice

AU - Stapleton, Karyn

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Recent studies have shown that the gender-swearing relationship is more complex and context-specific than has been supposed. We adopted a 'communities of practice' framework to contextualize the linguistic practice of swearing and to explore the meanings of this practice for one particular 'community, ' a group of undergraduate drinking friends. Through members' accounts, we can observe their negotiation of specific linguistic categories, and their ongoing (re)definition of 'bad language' as a resource for identity construction. These findings provide insights into the ways in which gender itself becomes redefined and contextualized within particular frames of reference. Both female and male participants reported habitually deploying strong language in the context of shared group enterprises, although a number of subtle, yet persistent gender differences reflect the respondents' location within the wider sociocultural context(s).

AB - Recent studies have shown that the gender-swearing relationship is more complex and context-specific than has been supposed. We adopted a 'communities of practice' framework to contextualize the linguistic practice of swearing and to explore the meanings of this practice for one particular 'community, ' a group of undergraduate drinking friends. Through members' accounts, we can observe their negotiation of specific linguistic categories, and their ongoing (re)definition of 'bad language' as a resource for identity construction. These findings provide insights into the ways in which gender itself becomes redefined and contextualized within particular frames of reference. Both female and male participants reported habitually deploying strong language in the context of shared group enterprises, although a number of subtle, yet persistent gender differences reflect the respondents' location within the wider sociocultural context(s).

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 22

EP - 33

JO - Women and Language

T2 - Women and Language

JF - Women and Language

SN - 8755-4550

IS - 2

ER -