From the Margin to the Middle:Taking Equity, Diversity and Interdependence Seriously

Duncan Morrow, Karin Eyben, Derick Wilson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In 1996, the Future Ways Project of the University of Ulster (Karin Eyben, Duncan Morrow, Derick Wilson) was engaged by CCRU to research the scope and scale of community relations education for adults in Northern Ireland. As soon as the decision was made to examine inter-community relationships in a wide variety of contexts and settings, the poverty and superficiality of the language of community relations emerged (Eyben, Morrow and Wilson, 1997, p6). Lacking any rigorous core, public understanding of community relations work was de facto dependent on what was experienced or heard of within its rubric, rather than on any overarching intellectual framework. Since this was overwhelmingly within the fields of community development, education and youth work, community relations were widely restricted within the popular mind to the possibilities and limits which such settings offered. While community relations work was widely associated with inter-community contact, it was intellectually separated from attempts to express difference and uniqueness in a pluralist and antagonistic context and from the issues of social distribution and justice which had motivated the civil rights campaign in the 1960s. Far too often, the first step in creating cross-community harmony was to promote a depoliticised environment. Left in this ghetto, community relations work had nothing to say about the desirable socio-economic, political or cultural basis for good relationships nor could it accommodate difficult discussions about ill treatment, injustice or identity. Stripped of these elements, it is unsurprising that community relations became associated with superficial engagement which acted to disguise underlying tensions rather than to heal them. The result of this confusion was that measures aimed at fostering social relationships that were both desirable and sustainable in Northern Ireland often ran at cross purposes to one another. Furthermore, the absence of a single framework within which the dilemmas of equality and justice, difference and cohesion could be named and resolved had significant social and economic costs. Eyben, Morrow and Wilson identified a need to refocus community relations work on its underlying intentions within the framework of liberal democracy. This implied a desire to reach beyond the experienced perception of community relations work, to an articulation of the principles which all such work sought to embody. In theory at least, the articulation of first principles could then release community relations work from the caricature of perceived practice and challenge all elements of society to consider their contribution to real common goals. Real sustainability demands that interdependence, equity and diversity be taken into consideration together. This has the further advantage of locating community relations work in the middle of the search for a democratic society, an aspiration theoretically shared by all political parties in Northern Ireland. Within a framework of equity, diversity and interdependence, legislative efforts to enforce minimum conditions of fair employment can be understood and measured alongside seemingly unrelated tools such as schools programmes for mutual understanding, local community development initiatives and the engagement of culturally important organisations such as the churches, sport and the arts. In a framework of sustainable development, trust and the distribution of social goods and power can at last be dealt with in parallel.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearching the Troubles
EditorsOwen Hargie, David Dickson
Pages163-181
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

interdependence
equity
community
community development
justice
youth work
ghetto
school program
civil rights
group cohesion
economics
equality
education
Sports
sustainable development
church
campaign
sustainability
contact
poverty

Keywords

  • Equity
  • Diversity
  • Interdependence
  • Reconciliation
  • Community Relations
  • Conflict Resolution
  • Northern Ireland

Cite this

Morrow, D., Eyben, K., & Wilson, D. (2003). From the Margin to the Middle:Taking Equity, Diversity and Interdependence Seriously. In O. Hargie, & D. Dickson (Eds.), Researching the Troubles (pp. 163-181)
Morrow, Duncan ; Eyben, Karin ; Wilson, Derick. / From the Margin to the Middle:Taking Equity, Diversity and Interdependence Seriously. Researching the Troubles. editor / Owen Hargie ; David Dickson. 2003. pp. 163-181
@inbook{d6ada77f7c724bb2b750b1fbea0cc3fe,
title = "From the Margin to the Middle:Taking Equity, Diversity and Interdependence Seriously",
abstract = "In 1996, the Future Ways Project of the University of Ulster (Karin Eyben, Duncan Morrow, Derick Wilson) was engaged by CCRU to research the scope and scale of community relations education for adults in Northern Ireland. As soon as the decision was made to examine inter-community relationships in a wide variety of contexts and settings, the poverty and superficiality of the language of community relations emerged (Eyben, Morrow and Wilson, 1997, p6). Lacking any rigorous core, public understanding of community relations work was de facto dependent on what was experienced or heard of within its rubric, rather than on any overarching intellectual framework. Since this was overwhelmingly within the fields of community development, education and youth work, community relations were widely restricted within the popular mind to the possibilities and limits which such settings offered. While community relations work was widely associated with inter-community contact, it was intellectually separated from attempts to express difference and uniqueness in a pluralist and antagonistic context and from the issues of social distribution and justice which had motivated the civil rights campaign in the 1960s. Far too often, the first step in creating cross-community harmony was to promote a depoliticised environment. Left in this ghetto, community relations work had nothing to say about the desirable socio-economic, political or cultural basis for good relationships nor could it accommodate difficult discussions about ill treatment, injustice or identity. Stripped of these elements, it is unsurprising that community relations became associated with superficial engagement which acted to disguise underlying tensions rather than to heal them. The result of this confusion was that measures aimed at fostering social relationships that were both desirable and sustainable in Northern Ireland often ran at cross purposes to one another. Furthermore, the absence of a single framework within which the dilemmas of equality and justice, difference and cohesion could be named and resolved had significant social and economic costs. Eyben, Morrow and Wilson identified a need to refocus community relations work on its underlying intentions within the framework of liberal democracy. This implied a desire to reach beyond the experienced perception of community relations work, to an articulation of the principles which all such work sought to embody. In theory at least, the articulation of first principles could then release community relations work from the caricature of perceived practice and challenge all elements of society to consider their contribution to real common goals. Real sustainability demands that interdependence, equity and diversity be taken into consideration together. This has the further advantage of locating community relations work in the middle of the search for a democratic society, an aspiration theoretically shared by all political parties in Northern Ireland. Within a framework of equity, diversity and interdependence, legislative efforts to enforce minimum conditions of fair employment can be understood and measured alongside seemingly unrelated tools such as schools programmes for mutual understanding, local community development initiatives and the engagement of culturally important organisations such as the churches, sport and the arts. In a framework of sustainable development, trust and the distribution of social goods and power can at last be dealt with in parallel.",
keywords = "Equity, Diversity, Interdependence, Reconciliation, Community Relations, Conflict Resolution, Northern Ireland",
author = "Duncan Morrow and Karin Eyben and Derick Wilson",
note = "Reference text: References Darby, John. (1976) Conflict in Northern Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan. Eyben, Karin. Morrow, Duncan. Wilson, Derick. A Worthwhile Venture: Practically Investing in Equity, Diversity and Interdependence. Coleraine and Jordanstown: University of Ulster. Hayes, Maurice. (1998) Minority Verdict. Belfast: Blackstaff. Levi-Strauss, Claude. (1962). La Pensee Sauvage, Paris: Plon. Marsden, Chris. (1996) Corporate Citizenship, Warwick: University of Warwick. McVeigh, Robbie. (1995), Cherishing the Children of the Nation Unequally, in Clancy, Peter ed. Irish Society: Sociological Perspectives, Dublin: Institute of Public Administration, pp620-645. Morrow, Duncan. The Churches and Inter-community Relationships, Coleraine: Centre for the Study of Conflict. NICS (1994) Fifth Report of the NICS Equal Opportunities Unit, Belfast: NICS. Purdie, Bob. Politics in the Streets, Belfast: Blackstaff. Wichert, Sabine. (1991) Northern Ireland since 1945. London and New York: Longman. Whyte, John. (1990) Interpreting Northern Ireland, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Wilson Derick (1996) Adults first please… in CRC Journal, Spring 1996, pp6-9. Wright, Frank. (1987) Northern Ireland: A Comparative Analysis. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan.",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
isbn = "1 84018 635 6",
pages = "163--181",
editor = "Owen Hargie and David Dickson",
booktitle = "Researching the Troubles",

}

Morrow, D, Eyben, K & Wilson, D 2003, From the Margin to the Middle:Taking Equity, Diversity and Interdependence Seriously. in O Hargie & D Dickson (eds), Researching the Troubles. pp. 163-181.

From the Margin to the Middle:Taking Equity, Diversity and Interdependence Seriously. / Morrow, Duncan; Eyben, Karin; Wilson, Derick.

Researching the Troubles. ed. / Owen Hargie; David Dickson. 2003. p. 163-181.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - From the Margin to the Middle:Taking Equity, Diversity and Interdependence Seriously

AU - Morrow, Duncan

AU - Eyben, Karin

AU - Wilson, Derick

N1 - Reference text: References Darby, John. (1976) Conflict in Northern Ireland. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan. Eyben, Karin. Morrow, Duncan. Wilson, Derick. A Worthwhile Venture: Practically Investing in Equity, Diversity and Interdependence. Coleraine and Jordanstown: University of Ulster. Hayes, Maurice. (1998) Minority Verdict. Belfast: Blackstaff. Levi-Strauss, Claude. (1962). La Pensee Sauvage, Paris: Plon. Marsden, Chris. (1996) Corporate Citizenship, Warwick: University of Warwick. McVeigh, Robbie. (1995), Cherishing the Children of the Nation Unequally, in Clancy, Peter ed. Irish Society: Sociological Perspectives, Dublin: Institute of Public Administration, pp620-645. Morrow, Duncan. The Churches and Inter-community Relationships, Coleraine: Centre for the Study of Conflict. NICS (1994) Fifth Report of the NICS Equal Opportunities Unit, Belfast: NICS. Purdie, Bob. Politics in the Streets, Belfast: Blackstaff. Wichert, Sabine. (1991) Northern Ireland since 1945. London and New York: Longman. Whyte, John. (1990) Interpreting Northern Ireland, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Wilson Derick (1996) Adults first please… in CRC Journal, Spring 1996, pp6-9. Wright, Frank. (1987) Northern Ireland: A Comparative Analysis. Dublin: Gill and MacMillan.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - In 1996, the Future Ways Project of the University of Ulster (Karin Eyben, Duncan Morrow, Derick Wilson) was engaged by CCRU to research the scope and scale of community relations education for adults in Northern Ireland. As soon as the decision was made to examine inter-community relationships in a wide variety of contexts and settings, the poverty and superficiality of the language of community relations emerged (Eyben, Morrow and Wilson, 1997, p6). Lacking any rigorous core, public understanding of community relations work was de facto dependent on what was experienced or heard of within its rubric, rather than on any overarching intellectual framework. Since this was overwhelmingly within the fields of community development, education and youth work, community relations were widely restricted within the popular mind to the possibilities and limits which such settings offered. While community relations work was widely associated with inter-community contact, it was intellectually separated from attempts to express difference and uniqueness in a pluralist and antagonistic context and from the issues of social distribution and justice which had motivated the civil rights campaign in the 1960s. Far too often, the first step in creating cross-community harmony was to promote a depoliticised environment. Left in this ghetto, community relations work had nothing to say about the desirable socio-economic, political or cultural basis for good relationships nor could it accommodate difficult discussions about ill treatment, injustice or identity. Stripped of these elements, it is unsurprising that community relations became associated with superficial engagement which acted to disguise underlying tensions rather than to heal them. The result of this confusion was that measures aimed at fostering social relationships that were both desirable and sustainable in Northern Ireland often ran at cross purposes to one another. Furthermore, the absence of a single framework within which the dilemmas of equality and justice, difference and cohesion could be named and resolved had significant social and economic costs. Eyben, Morrow and Wilson identified a need to refocus community relations work on its underlying intentions within the framework of liberal democracy. This implied a desire to reach beyond the experienced perception of community relations work, to an articulation of the principles which all such work sought to embody. In theory at least, the articulation of first principles could then release community relations work from the caricature of perceived practice and challenge all elements of society to consider their contribution to real common goals. Real sustainability demands that interdependence, equity and diversity be taken into consideration together. This has the further advantage of locating community relations work in the middle of the search for a democratic society, an aspiration theoretically shared by all political parties in Northern Ireland. Within a framework of equity, diversity and interdependence, legislative efforts to enforce minimum conditions of fair employment can be understood and measured alongside seemingly unrelated tools such as schools programmes for mutual understanding, local community development initiatives and the engagement of culturally important organisations such as the churches, sport and the arts. In a framework of sustainable development, trust and the distribution of social goods and power can at last be dealt with in parallel.

AB - In 1996, the Future Ways Project of the University of Ulster (Karin Eyben, Duncan Morrow, Derick Wilson) was engaged by CCRU to research the scope and scale of community relations education for adults in Northern Ireland. As soon as the decision was made to examine inter-community relationships in a wide variety of contexts and settings, the poverty and superficiality of the language of community relations emerged (Eyben, Morrow and Wilson, 1997, p6). Lacking any rigorous core, public understanding of community relations work was de facto dependent on what was experienced or heard of within its rubric, rather than on any overarching intellectual framework. Since this was overwhelmingly within the fields of community development, education and youth work, community relations were widely restricted within the popular mind to the possibilities and limits which such settings offered. While community relations work was widely associated with inter-community contact, it was intellectually separated from attempts to express difference and uniqueness in a pluralist and antagonistic context and from the issues of social distribution and justice which had motivated the civil rights campaign in the 1960s. Far too often, the first step in creating cross-community harmony was to promote a depoliticised environment. Left in this ghetto, community relations work had nothing to say about the desirable socio-economic, political or cultural basis for good relationships nor could it accommodate difficult discussions about ill treatment, injustice or identity. Stripped of these elements, it is unsurprising that community relations became associated with superficial engagement which acted to disguise underlying tensions rather than to heal them. The result of this confusion was that measures aimed at fostering social relationships that were both desirable and sustainable in Northern Ireland often ran at cross purposes to one another. Furthermore, the absence of a single framework within which the dilemmas of equality and justice, difference and cohesion could be named and resolved had significant social and economic costs. Eyben, Morrow and Wilson identified a need to refocus community relations work on its underlying intentions within the framework of liberal democracy. This implied a desire to reach beyond the experienced perception of community relations work, to an articulation of the principles which all such work sought to embody. In theory at least, the articulation of first principles could then release community relations work from the caricature of perceived practice and challenge all elements of society to consider their contribution to real common goals. Real sustainability demands that interdependence, equity and diversity be taken into consideration together. This has the further advantage of locating community relations work in the middle of the search for a democratic society, an aspiration theoretically shared by all political parties in Northern Ireland. Within a framework of equity, diversity and interdependence, legislative efforts to enforce minimum conditions of fair employment can be understood and measured alongside seemingly unrelated tools such as schools programmes for mutual understanding, local community development initiatives and the engagement of culturally important organisations such as the churches, sport and the arts. In a framework of sustainable development, trust and the distribution of social goods and power can at last be dealt with in parallel.

KW - Equity

KW - Diversity

KW - Interdependence

KW - Reconciliation

KW - Community Relations

KW - Conflict Resolution

KW - Northern Ireland

M3 - Chapter

SN - 1 84018 635 6

SP - 163

EP - 181

BT - Researching the Troubles

A2 - Hargie, Owen

A2 - Dickson, David

ER -

Morrow D, Eyben K, Wilson D. From the Margin to the Middle:Taking Equity, Diversity and Interdependence Seriously. In Hargie O, Dickson D, editors, Researching the Troubles. 2003. p. 163-181