FRAME-AND-SPOT-INDUCED MOTION - RANGE EFFECTS AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FIXATION AND NONFIXATION OF THE INDUCED STIMULUS

Anthony Reinhardt-Rutland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    For frame-and-spot-induced linear motion, Humber and Sherrick report that induced motion of a nonfixated static spot reduces as its separation from a fixated static spot increases. The authors invoke sensory factors, but range effects may undermine this interpretation.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages653-654
    JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
    Volume76
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 1993

    Fingerprint

    SPOT (French satellite)
    stimuli

    Cite this

    @article{af34c3b3a0ed4245ab1b88411265c2bb,
    title = "FRAME-AND-SPOT-INDUCED MOTION - RANGE EFFECTS AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FIXATION AND NONFIXATION OF THE INDUCED STIMULUS",
    abstract = "For frame-and-spot-induced linear motion, Humber and Sherrick report that induced motion of a nonfixated static spot reduces as its separation from a fixated static spot increases. The authors invoke sensory factors, but range effects may undermine this interpretation.",
    author = "Anthony Reinhardt-Rutland",
    year = "1993",
    month = "4",
    language = "English",
    volume = "76",
    pages = "653--654",
    journal = "Perceptual and Motor Skills",
    issn = "0031-5125",
    number = "2",

    }

    FRAME-AND-SPOT-INDUCED MOTION - RANGE EFFECTS AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FIXATION AND NONFIXATION OF THE INDUCED STIMULUS. / Reinhardt-Rutland, Anthony.

    In: Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 76, No. 2, 04.1993, p. 653-654.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - FRAME-AND-SPOT-INDUCED MOTION - RANGE EFFECTS AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FIXATION AND NONFIXATION OF THE INDUCED STIMULUS

    AU - Reinhardt-Rutland, Anthony

    PY - 1993/4

    Y1 - 1993/4

    N2 - For frame-and-spot-induced linear motion, Humber and Sherrick report that induced motion of a nonfixated static spot reduces as its separation from a fixated static spot increases. The authors invoke sensory factors, but range effects may undermine this interpretation.

    AB - For frame-and-spot-induced linear motion, Humber and Sherrick report that induced motion of a nonfixated static spot reduces as its separation from a fixated static spot increases. The authors invoke sensory factors, but range effects may undermine this interpretation.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 76

    SP - 653

    EP - 654

    JO - Perceptual and Motor Skills

    T2 - Perceptual and Motor Skills

    JF - Perceptual and Motor Skills

    SN - 0031-5125

    IS - 2

    ER -