Flight assessment in patients with respiratory disease: hypoxic challenge testing vs. predictive equations

S. E. Martin, Judy Bradley, J. B. Buick, I. Bradbury, J. S. Elborn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    28 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Predictive equations have been proposedas a simpler alternative to hypoxic challengetesting (HCT) for determining the risk of in-flighthypoxia.Aim: To assess agreement between hypoxic challengetesting (HCT) and predictive equations forassessment of in-flight hypoxia.Design: Retrospective study.Methods: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease (COPD) (n¼15), interstitial lung disease(ILD) (n¼15) and cystic fibrosis (CF) (n¼15) werestudied. Spirometry was recorded prior to hypoxicinhalation and oxygen saturations (SpO2) wererecorded before, after and during hypoxic inhalation.Blood gases were analysed before and afterhypoxic inhalation and when SpO2¼85%. An HCTwas performed using the Ventimask method.The PaO2 at altitude was estimated for each groupusing four published predictive equations, whichuse values of PaO2 (ground) and lung functionmeasurements to predict altitude PaO2. Results wereinterpreted using the BTS recommendations forprescription of in-flight oxygen post HCT. TheStuart Maxwell test of overall homogeneity wasused to assess agreement between HCT results andeach of the predictive equations.Results: Ground PaO2 was significantly greater inpatients with CF than either ILD or COPD (p <0.05).PaO2 in all three groups significantly decreasedfollowing HCT. With the exception of equation 3,significantly fewer patients in each group wouldrequire in-flight O2 if prescription was based onHCT, compared to predictive equations (p <0.05).Discussion: Predictive equations considerablyoverestimate the need for in-flight O2, comparedto HCT.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages361-367
    JournalQJM: An International Journal of Medicine
    Volume100
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

    Fingerprint

    Interstitial Lung Diseases
    Cystic Fibrosis
    Inhalation
    Oxygen
    Spirometry
    Prescriptions
    Inpatients
    Retrospective Studies
    Gases
    Lung
    Hypoxia

    Cite this

    Martin, S. E. ; Bradley, Judy ; Buick, J. B. ; Bradbury, I. ; Elborn, J. S. / Flight assessment in patients with respiratory disease: hypoxic challenge testing vs. predictive equations. In: QJM: An International Journal of Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 100, No. 6. pp. 361-367.
    @article{8d2c72a34a764222b5c0acbe4d00c083,
    title = "Flight assessment in patients with respiratory disease: hypoxic challenge testing vs. predictive equations",
    abstract = "Background: Predictive equations have been proposedas a simpler alternative to hypoxic challengetesting (HCT) for determining the risk of in-flighthypoxia.Aim: To assess agreement between hypoxic challengetesting (HCT) and predictive equations forassessment of in-flight hypoxia.Design: Retrospective study.Methods: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease (COPD) (n¼15), interstitial lung disease(ILD) (n¼15) and cystic fibrosis (CF) (n¼15) werestudied. Spirometry was recorded prior to hypoxicinhalation and oxygen saturations (SpO2) wererecorded before, after and during hypoxic inhalation.Blood gases were analysed before and afterhypoxic inhalation and when SpO2¼85{\%}. An HCTwas performed using the Ventimask method.The PaO2 at altitude was estimated for each groupusing four published predictive equations, whichuse values of PaO2 (ground) and lung functionmeasurements to predict altitude PaO2. Results wereinterpreted using the BTS recommendations forprescription of in-flight oxygen post HCT. TheStuart Maxwell test of overall homogeneity wasused to assess agreement between HCT results andeach of the predictive equations.Results: Ground PaO2 was significantly greater inpatients with CF than either ILD or COPD (p <0.05).PaO2 in all three groups significantly decreasedfollowing HCT. With the exception of equation 3,significantly fewer patients in each group wouldrequire in-flight O2 if prescription was based onHCT, compared to predictive equations (p <0.05).Discussion: Predictive equations considerablyoverestimate the need for in-flight O2, comparedto HCT.",
    author = "Martin, {S. E.} and Judy Bradley and Buick, {J. B.} and I. Bradbury and Elborn, {J. S.}",
    year = "2007",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1093/qjmed/hcm033",
    language = "English",
    volume = "100",
    pages = "361--367",
    journal = "QJM: An International Journal of Medicine",
    issn = "1460-2725",
    number = "6",

    }

    Flight assessment in patients with respiratory disease: hypoxic challenge testing vs. predictive equations. / Martin, S. E.; Bradley, Judy; Buick, J. B.; Bradbury, I.; Elborn, J. S.

    In: QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, Vol. 100, No. 6, 06.2007, p. 361-367.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Flight assessment in patients with respiratory disease: hypoxic challenge testing vs. predictive equations

    AU - Martin, S. E.

    AU - Bradley, Judy

    AU - Buick, J. B.

    AU - Bradbury, I.

    AU - Elborn, J. S.

    PY - 2007/6

    Y1 - 2007/6

    N2 - Background: Predictive equations have been proposedas a simpler alternative to hypoxic challengetesting (HCT) for determining the risk of in-flighthypoxia.Aim: To assess agreement between hypoxic challengetesting (HCT) and predictive equations forassessment of in-flight hypoxia.Design: Retrospective study.Methods: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease (COPD) (n¼15), interstitial lung disease(ILD) (n¼15) and cystic fibrosis (CF) (n¼15) werestudied. Spirometry was recorded prior to hypoxicinhalation and oxygen saturations (SpO2) wererecorded before, after and during hypoxic inhalation.Blood gases were analysed before and afterhypoxic inhalation and when SpO2¼85%. An HCTwas performed using the Ventimask method.The PaO2 at altitude was estimated for each groupusing four published predictive equations, whichuse values of PaO2 (ground) and lung functionmeasurements to predict altitude PaO2. Results wereinterpreted using the BTS recommendations forprescription of in-flight oxygen post HCT. TheStuart Maxwell test of overall homogeneity wasused to assess agreement between HCT results andeach of the predictive equations.Results: Ground PaO2 was significantly greater inpatients with CF than either ILD or COPD (p <0.05).PaO2 in all three groups significantly decreasedfollowing HCT. With the exception of equation 3,significantly fewer patients in each group wouldrequire in-flight O2 if prescription was based onHCT, compared to predictive equations (p <0.05).Discussion: Predictive equations considerablyoverestimate the need for in-flight O2, comparedto HCT.

    AB - Background: Predictive equations have been proposedas a simpler alternative to hypoxic challengetesting (HCT) for determining the risk of in-flighthypoxia.Aim: To assess agreement between hypoxic challengetesting (HCT) and predictive equations forassessment of in-flight hypoxia.Design: Retrospective study.Methods: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonarydisease (COPD) (n¼15), interstitial lung disease(ILD) (n¼15) and cystic fibrosis (CF) (n¼15) werestudied. Spirometry was recorded prior to hypoxicinhalation and oxygen saturations (SpO2) wererecorded before, after and during hypoxic inhalation.Blood gases were analysed before and afterhypoxic inhalation and when SpO2¼85%. An HCTwas performed using the Ventimask method.The PaO2 at altitude was estimated for each groupusing four published predictive equations, whichuse values of PaO2 (ground) and lung functionmeasurements to predict altitude PaO2. Results wereinterpreted using the BTS recommendations forprescription of in-flight oxygen post HCT. TheStuart Maxwell test of overall homogeneity wasused to assess agreement between HCT results andeach of the predictive equations.Results: Ground PaO2 was significantly greater inpatients with CF than either ILD or COPD (p <0.05).PaO2 in all three groups significantly decreasedfollowing HCT. With the exception of equation 3,significantly fewer patients in each group wouldrequire in-flight O2 if prescription was based onHCT, compared to predictive equations (p <0.05).Discussion: Predictive equations considerablyoverestimate the need for in-flight O2, comparedto HCT.

    U2 - 10.1093/qjmed/hcm033

    DO - 10.1093/qjmed/hcm033

    M3 - Article

    VL - 100

    SP - 361

    EP - 367

    JO - QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

    T2 - QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

    JF - QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

    SN - 1460-2725

    IS - 6

    ER -