Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Fish consumption advice is depriving children of neurolipids and other nutrients essential to brain and eye development

  • Philip Spiller
  • , J Thomas Brenna
  • , Susan E Carlson
  • , Jean Golding
  • , Michael A Crawford
  • , Joseph R Hibbeln
  • , Berthold V Koletzko
  • , John Columbo
  • , Penny Kris-Etherton
  • , Sonja L Connor
  • , Clark Carrington
  • , P Michael Bolger
  • , Joyce A Nettleton
  • , William S Harris
  • , Kristina Jackson
  • , Robert K McNamara
  • , Kara M Morgan
  • , Nicholas V C Ralston
  • , Laura Raymond
  • , Michael F Tlusty
  • Caroline M Taylor, J J Strain, Emeir M McSorley, Maria S Mulhern, Alison J Yeates, Marie C Conway, Heather R Adams, Gene E Watson, Edwin van Wijngaarden, Gary J Myers

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A large and growing body of published research has found considerable evidence of improvements and little evidence of harm to children's neurodevelopment, including IQ, when pregnant women eat more fish, particularly ocean species. Fish is the primary dietary source for people of omega-3 fatty acids that are essential building blocks for brain structure and function. The human body cannot synthesize adequate amounts of these omega-3s for optimal brain development so they must be obtained preformed, mainly from fish. However, the evidence indicates that women often reduce or eliminate their fish consumption when they become pregnant out of fear that methylmercury will harm their children's neurodevelopment. This discrepancy between scientific findings and behavior appears to be caused or amplified by highly influential federal advice (fish advisories) that have been urging pregnant women to observe precautionary limitations on their consumption since 2001. Our concern is that these limitations are inadvertently encouraging pregnant women to avoid what could be substantial gains to their children's neurodevelopment on a population-wide basis. We discuss how a new fish advisory based on the latest scientific findings could benefit children's brain and cognitive development. We urge the academic/scientific community to develop and disseminate it and use it as a basis for education campaigns.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-31
Number of pages5
JournalNeurotoxicology
Volume109
Early online date20 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 31 Jul 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.

Funding

Author Caroline M. Taylor acknowledges that she was supported by a Medical Research Council (MRC) Career Development Award (grant number MR/T010010/1 ). No other author declared that they received any financial support relevant to this manuscript.

FundersFunder number
Medical Research CouncilMR/T010010/1
Medical Research Council

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • IQ
    • Fish
    • Neurodevelopment
    • Omega-3
    • Methylmercury
    • Advisory
    • Pregnancy
    • Humans
    • Seafood/adverse effects
    • Methylmercury Compounds
    • Brain/growth & development
    • Child Development/drug effects
    • Animals
    • Fishes
    • Fatty Acids, Omega-3/administration & dosage
    • Eye/growth & development
    • Female
    • Child

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Fish consumption advice is depriving children of neurolipids and other nutrients essential to brain and eye development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this