Financing infrastructure development: time to unshackle the bonds?

Norman Hutchison, Graham Squires, AS Adair, James Berry, Daniel Lo, Stanley McGreal, Sam Organ

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to consider the merits of using projects bonds to finance infrastructure investment projects and considers the pricing of such bonds and the level of risk premium demanded by the market.

Design/methodology/approach
The research used a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods with desk-based study and interviews. Interviews were held with policy makers, local authority staff, planners, developers, investors, fund managers and academics. Infrastructure bond data were obtained from the Bloomberg database on all project bonds issued in four Asian countries – Malaysia, China, Taiwan and India – over the period 2003-2014.

Findings
The analysis indicates investor appetite for project bonds and suggests that a risk premium of between 150 and 300 basis points over the comparable government bond is appropriate depending on the sector and the degree of government involvement in underwriting the issue.

Practical implications
The paper argues that the introduction of project bonds would be an important innovation, assisting the financing of infrastructure investment at a time when bank lending is likely to remain fragile. The current conditions in the sovereign debt market, where strong demand has forced down yields, has opened up the opportunity to introduce project bonds offering a higher yield to satisfy institutional investment demand for long term fixed income products.

Originality/value
The originality of this paper stems from the analysis of the merits of using projects bonds to finance infrastructure investment projects, the pricing of such bonds and the level of risk premium demanded by the market.
LanguageEnglish
Pages208-224
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Property Investment & Finance
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2016

Fingerprint

Infrastructure investment
Infrastructure development
Risk premium
Financing
Finance
Pricing
Investors
Investment project
Data base
Quantitative methods
China
Sovereign debt
Fixed income
Politicians
Institutional investment
Local authorities
Malaysia
Innovation
Qualitative methods
Fund managers

Keywords

  • Institutions
  • Investment
  • Finance
  • Risk premium
  • Infrastructure
  • Project bonds

Cite this

@article{44fdbb79eebb4945ac66fbf717ece762,
title = "Financing infrastructure development: time to unshackle the bonds?",
abstract = "PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to consider the merits of using projects bonds to finance infrastructure investment projects and considers the pricing of such bonds and the level of risk premium demanded by the market.Design/methodology/approachThe research used a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods with desk-based study and interviews. Interviews were held with policy makers, local authority staff, planners, developers, investors, fund managers and academics. Infrastructure bond data were obtained from the Bloomberg database on all project bonds issued in four Asian countries – Malaysia, China, Taiwan and India – over the period 2003-2014.FindingsThe analysis indicates investor appetite for project bonds and suggests that a risk premium of between 150 and 300 basis points over the comparable government bond is appropriate depending on the sector and the degree of government involvement in underwriting the issue.Practical implicationsThe paper argues that the introduction of project bonds would be an important innovation, assisting the financing of infrastructure investment at a time when bank lending is likely to remain fragile. The current conditions in the sovereign debt market, where strong demand has forced down yields, has opened up the opportunity to introduce project bonds offering a higher yield to satisfy institutional investment demand for long term fixed income products.Originality/valueThe originality of this paper stems from the analysis of the merits of using projects bonds to finance infrastructure investment projects, the pricing of such bonds and the level of risk premium demanded by the market.",
keywords = "Institutions, Investment, Finance, Risk premium, Infrastructure, Project bonds",
author = "Norman Hutchison and Graham Squires and AS Adair and James Berry and Daniel Lo and Stanley McGreal and Sam Organ",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1108/JPIF-07-2015-0047",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "208--224",
journal = "Journal of Property Investment and Finance",
issn = "1463-578X",
number = "3",

}

Financing infrastructure development: time to unshackle the bonds? / Hutchison, Norman; Squires, Graham; Adair, AS; Berry, James; Lo, Daniel; McGreal, Stanley; Organ, Sam.

In: Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol. 34, No. 3, 04.04.2016, p. 208-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Financing infrastructure development: time to unshackle the bonds?

AU - Hutchison, Norman

AU - Squires, Graham

AU - Adair, AS

AU - Berry, James

AU - Lo, Daniel

AU - McGreal, Stanley

AU - Organ, Sam

PY - 2016/4/4

Y1 - 2016/4/4

N2 - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to consider the merits of using projects bonds to finance infrastructure investment projects and considers the pricing of such bonds and the level of risk premium demanded by the market.Design/methodology/approachThe research used a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods with desk-based study and interviews. Interviews were held with policy makers, local authority staff, planners, developers, investors, fund managers and academics. Infrastructure bond data were obtained from the Bloomberg database on all project bonds issued in four Asian countries – Malaysia, China, Taiwan and India – over the period 2003-2014.FindingsThe analysis indicates investor appetite for project bonds and suggests that a risk premium of between 150 and 300 basis points over the comparable government bond is appropriate depending on the sector and the degree of government involvement in underwriting the issue.Practical implicationsThe paper argues that the introduction of project bonds would be an important innovation, assisting the financing of infrastructure investment at a time when bank lending is likely to remain fragile. The current conditions in the sovereign debt market, where strong demand has forced down yields, has opened up the opportunity to introduce project bonds offering a higher yield to satisfy institutional investment demand for long term fixed income products.Originality/valueThe originality of this paper stems from the analysis of the merits of using projects bonds to finance infrastructure investment projects, the pricing of such bonds and the level of risk premium demanded by the market.

AB - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to consider the merits of using projects bonds to finance infrastructure investment projects and considers the pricing of such bonds and the level of risk premium demanded by the market.Design/methodology/approachThe research used a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods with desk-based study and interviews. Interviews were held with policy makers, local authority staff, planners, developers, investors, fund managers and academics. Infrastructure bond data were obtained from the Bloomberg database on all project bonds issued in four Asian countries – Malaysia, China, Taiwan and India – over the period 2003-2014.FindingsThe analysis indicates investor appetite for project bonds and suggests that a risk premium of between 150 and 300 basis points over the comparable government bond is appropriate depending on the sector and the degree of government involvement in underwriting the issue.Practical implicationsThe paper argues that the introduction of project bonds would be an important innovation, assisting the financing of infrastructure investment at a time when bank lending is likely to remain fragile. The current conditions in the sovereign debt market, where strong demand has forced down yields, has opened up the opportunity to introduce project bonds offering a higher yield to satisfy institutional investment demand for long term fixed income products.Originality/valueThe originality of this paper stems from the analysis of the merits of using projects bonds to finance infrastructure investment projects, the pricing of such bonds and the level of risk premium demanded by the market.

KW - Institutions

KW - Investment

KW - Finance

KW - Risk premium

KW - Infrastructure

KW - Project bonds

U2 - 10.1108/JPIF-07-2015-0047

DO - 10.1108/JPIF-07-2015-0047

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 208

EP - 224

JO - Journal of Property Investment and Finance

T2 - Journal of Property Investment and Finance

JF - Journal of Property Investment and Finance

SN - 1463-578X

IS - 3

ER -