Fighting for Justice (and Survival): Kenyan Civil Society Accountability Strategies and Their Enemies

Thomas Obel Hansen, Chandra Sriram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing on interviews with civil society actors and international donors, this article examines the role of Kenyan civil society in advancing accountability for serious inter- national crimes, specifically the 2007–2008 post-election violence. We consider civil society as recipient and transmitter of norms of accountability and as transformer and user of such norms, as well as civil society strategies for engaging with actors domestic- ally and internationally. Exploring how civil society has devised advocacy strategies relating to the International Criminal Court and domestic justice mechanisms, we chal- lenge some of the assumptions in the literature on civil society and accountability. In particular, we question whether civil society can predominantly rely on international standards as part of a ‘justice cascade,’ arguing that the Kenyan case illustrates a more complex situation where narratives of justice and accountability continuously change and may be undermined as a consequence of counternarratives devised by those opposed to criminal justice.
LanguageEnglish
Pages407-427
JournalThe International Journal of Transitional Justice
Volume9
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jul 2015

Fingerprint

civil society
justice
responsibility
International Criminal Court
allies
recipient
election
offense
violence
narrative
interview

Keywords

  • Kenya
  • civil society
  • accountability
  • International Criminal Court

Cite this

@article{cb43ba7239ac4b70815d0a7571b71379,
title = "Fighting for Justice (and Survival): Kenyan Civil Society Accountability Strategies and Their Enemies",
abstract = "Drawing on interviews with civil society actors and international donors, this article examines the role of Kenyan civil society in advancing accountability for serious inter- national crimes, specifically the 2007–2008 post-election violence. We consider civil society as recipient and transmitter of norms of accountability and as transformer and user of such norms, as well as civil society strategies for engaging with actors domestic- ally and internationally. Exploring how civil society has devised advocacy strategies relating to the International Criminal Court and domestic justice mechanisms, we chal- lenge some of the assumptions in the literature on civil society and accountability. In particular, we question whether civil society can predominantly rely on international standards as part of a ‘justice cascade,’ arguing that the Kenyan case illustrates a more complex situation where narratives of justice and accountability continuously change and may be undermined as a consequence of counternarratives devised by those opposed to criminal justice.",
keywords = "Kenya, civil society, accountability, International Criminal Court",
author = "Hansen, {Thomas Obel} and Chandra Sriram",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "25",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "407--427",
journal = "International Journal of Transitional Justice",
issn = "1752-7716",
number = "3",

}

Fighting for Justice (and Survival): Kenyan Civil Society Accountability Strategies and Their Enemies. / Hansen, Thomas Obel; Sriram, Chandra.

In: The International Journal of Transitional Justice, Vol. 9, No. 3, 25.07.2015, p. 407-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fighting for Justice (and Survival): Kenyan Civil Society Accountability Strategies and Their Enemies

AU - Hansen, Thomas Obel

AU - Sriram, Chandra

PY - 2015/7/25

Y1 - 2015/7/25

N2 - Drawing on interviews with civil society actors and international donors, this article examines the role of Kenyan civil society in advancing accountability for serious inter- national crimes, specifically the 2007–2008 post-election violence. We consider civil society as recipient and transmitter of norms of accountability and as transformer and user of such norms, as well as civil society strategies for engaging with actors domestic- ally and internationally. Exploring how civil society has devised advocacy strategies relating to the International Criminal Court and domestic justice mechanisms, we chal- lenge some of the assumptions in the literature on civil society and accountability. In particular, we question whether civil society can predominantly rely on international standards as part of a ‘justice cascade,’ arguing that the Kenyan case illustrates a more complex situation where narratives of justice and accountability continuously change and may be undermined as a consequence of counternarratives devised by those opposed to criminal justice.

AB - Drawing on interviews with civil society actors and international donors, this article examines the role of Kenyan civil society in advancing accountability for serious inter- national crimes, specifically the 2007–2008 post-election violence. We consider civil society as recipient and transmitter of norms of accountability and as transformer and user of such norms, as well as civil society strategies for engaging with actors domestic- ally and internationally. Exploring how civil society has devised advocacy strategies relating to the International Criminal Court and domestic justice mechanisms, we chal- lenge some of the assumptions in the literature on civil society and accountability. In particular, we question whether civil society can predominantly rely on international standards as part of a ‘justice cascade,’ arguing that the Kenyan case illustrates a more complex situation where narratives of justice and accountability continuously change and may be undermined as a consequence of counternarratives devised by those opposed to criminal justice.

KW - Kenya

KW - civil society

KW - accountability

KW - International Criminal Court

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 407

EP - 427

JO - International Journal of Transitional Justice

T2 - International Journal of Transitional Justice

JF - International Journal of Transitional Justice

SN - 1752-7716

IS - 3

ER -