Fifth nation: The United Kingdom between definite and indefinite articles

Arthur Aughey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article re-examines the utility of the idea of ‘fifth nation’ as a way of conceptualising the contemporary United Kingdom. The term appeared first in published form in the introduction by Peter Madgwick and Richard Rose to their jointly edited book, The Territorial Dimension in United Kingdom Politics (1982).There, Madgwick and Rose thought that ‘the United Kingdom is a fifth “nation” in Westminster’. In Understanding the United Kingdom published in the same year,Rose provided a different stress: Parliament ‘is, as it were, the fifth nation of the United Kingdom’. It is the argument of this article that ‘fifth nation’ still captures an important truth about the United Kingdom, but that devolution involves a shift in emphasis from the definite to the indefinite article. The first part of this article considers the character of the United Kingdom as the fifth nation as Rose (andothers) defined it. The second part considers how devolution challenges the comprehension of that idea. The final, and more speculative, part suggests that to understand the United Kingdom in some respects as a fifth nation may be more appropriate in contemporary circumstances.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages265-285
    JournalBritish Politics
    Volume5
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010

    Fingerprint

    decentralization
    parliament
    Indefinite Article
    Definite Article
    comprehension
    politics
    Devolution
    Definites
    Parliament
    Westminster

    Cite this

    Aughey, Arthur. / Fifth nation: The United Kingdom between definite and indefinite articles. In: British Politics. 2010 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 265-285.
    @article{67076fc8b28c4f2bb454b6ab43ca6da4,
    title = "Fifth nation: The United Kingdom between definite and indefinite articles",
    abstract = "This article re-examines the utility of the idea of ‘fifth nation’ as a way of conceptualising the contemporary United Kingdom. The term appeared first in published form in the introduction by Peter Madgwick and Richard Rose to their jointly edited book, The Territorial Dimension in United Kingdom Politics (1982).There, Madgwick and Rose thought that ‘the United Kingdom is a fifth “nation” in Westminster’. In Understanding the United Kingdom published in the same year,Rose provided a different stress: Parliament ‘is, as it were, the fifth nation of the United Kingdom’. It is the argument of this article that ‘fifth nation’ still captures an important truth about the United Kingdom, but that devolution involves a shift in emphasis from the definite to the indefinite article. The first part of this article considers the character of the United Kingdom as the fifth nation as Rose (andothers) defined it. The second part considers how devolution challenges the comprehension of that idea. The final, and more speculative, part suggests that to understand the United Kingdom in some respects as a fifth nation may be more appropriate in contemporary circumstances.",
    author = "Arthur Aughey",
    year = "2010",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1057/bp.2010.8",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "265--285",
    journal = "British Politics",
    issn = "1746-918X",
    number = "3",

    }

    Fifth nation: The United Kingdom between definite and indefinite articles. / Aughey, Arthur.

    In: British Politics, Vol. 5, No. 3, 09.2010, p. 265-285.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Fifth nation: The United Kingdom between definite and indefinite articles

    AU - Aughey, Arthur

    PY - 2010/9

    Y1 - 2010/9

    N2 - This article re-examines the utility of the idea of ‘fifth nation’ as a way of conceptualising the contemporary United Kingdom. The term appeared first in published form in the introduction by Peter Madgwick and Richard Rose to their jointly edited book, The Territorial Dimension in United Kingdom Politics (1982).There, Madgwick and Rose thought that ‘the United Kingdom is a fifth “nation” in Westminster’. In Understanding the United Kingdom published in the same year,Rose provided a different stress: Parliament ‘is, as it were, the fifth nation of the United Kingdom’. It is the argument of this article that ‘fifth nation’ still captures an important truth about the United Kingdom, but that devolution involves a shift in emphasis from the definite to the indefinite article. The first part of this article considers the character of the United Kingdom as the fifth nation as Rose (andothers) defined it. The second part considers how devolution challenges the comprehension of that idea. The final, and more speculative, part suggests that to understand the United Kingdom in some respects as a fifth nation may be more appropriate in contemporary circumstances.

    AB - This article re-examines the utility of the idea of ‘fifth nation’ as a way of conceptualising the contemporary United Kingdom. The term appeared first in published form in the introduction by Peter Madgwick and Richard Rose to their jointly edited book, The Territorial Dimension in United Kingdom Politics (1982).There, Madgwick and Rose thought that ‘the United Kingdom is a fifth “nation” in Westminster’. In Understanding the United Kingdom published in the same year,Rose provided a different stress: Parliament ‘is, as it were, the fifth nation of the United Kingdom’. It is the argument of this article that ‘fifth nation’ still captures an important truth about the United Kingdom, but that devolution involves a shift in emphasis from the definite to the indefinite article. The first part of this article considers the character of the United Kingdom as the fifth nation as Rose (andothers) defined it. The second part considers how devolution challenges the comprehension of that idea. The final, and more speculative, part suggests that to understand the United Kingdom in some respects as a fifth nation may be more appropriate in contemporary circumstances.

    U2 - 10.1057/bp.2010.8

    DO - 10.1057/bp.2010.8

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 265

    EP - 285

    JO - British Politics

    T2 - British Politics

    JF - British Politics

    SN - 1746-918X

    IS - 3

    ER -