Fidelity review: A scoping review of the methods used to evaluate treatment fidelity in behavioural change interventions

Orlagh O’Shea, Rosemary McCormick, Judy Bradley, Brenda O’Neill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To identify the definitions used for treatment fidelity in the behaviour change literature and to explore the extent to which the assessment of fidelity has been reported according to the five domains by Bellg et al.Methods: Three databases (Scopus, Medline Ovid and CINAHL) were searched. Results were limited to studies published between 2012 and 2015. Definitions/summaries of treatment fidelity used were recorded. Methods for assessing/monitoring treatment fidelity were extracted, summarised and categorised according to the five domains.Results: Sixty-five papers were included for analysis. A definition of treatment fidelity was provided by n = 34 studies; n = 9 defined fidelity according to Bellg et al. In the context of treatment fidelity, n = 9 (13.8%) reported on study design; n = 22 (33.8%) reported on an element of training of providers; n = 59 (90.7%) papers reported on delivery of treatment; n = 13 (20%) reported on receipt of treatment; and n = 10 (15.3%) reported on enactment of treatment skills.Conclusion: The definitions of treatment fidelity in the literature and the extent to which it has been reported were limited. Delivery of treatment was the most frequently reported component of treatment fidelity but other important aspects were poorly reported. The potential consequence of this is that translation of research interventions into clinical practice may not be optimised.
LanguageEnglish
Pages207-214
JournalPhysical Therapy Reviews
Volume21
Issue number3-6
Early online date20 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Databases
Research

Keywords

  • Treatment fidelity
  • Behaviour change
  • Physiotherapy
  • Physical activity
  • Exercise

Cite this

@article{0873906899cd42778dbb7b6aa332d0e8,
title = "Fidelity review: A scoping review of the methods used to evaluate treatment fidelity in behavioural change interventions",
abstract = "Objectives: To identify the definitions used for treatment fidelity in the behaviour change literature and to explore the extent to which the assessment of fidelity has been reported according to the five domains by Bellg et al.Methods: Three databases (Scopus, Medline Ovid and CINAHL) were searched. Results were limited to studies published between 2012 and 2015. Definitions/summaries of treatment fidelity used were recorded. Methods for assessing/monitoring treatment fidelity were extracted, summarised and categorised according to the five domains.Results: Sixty-five papers were included for analysis. A definition of treatment fidelity was provided by n = 34 studies; n = 9 defined fidelity according to Bellg et al. In the context of treatment fidelity, n = 9 (13.8{\%}) reported on study design; n = 22 (33.8{\%}) reported on an element of training of providers; n = 59 (90.7{\%}) papers reported on delivery of treatment; n = 13 (20{\%}) reported on receipt of treatment; and n = 10 (15.3{\%}) reported on enactment of treatment skills.Conclusion: The definitions of treatment fidelity in the literature and the extent to which it has been reported were limited. Delivery of treatment was the most frequently reported component of treatment fidelity but other important aspects were poorly reported. The potential consequence of this is that translation of research interventions into clinical practice may not be optimised.",
keywords = "Treatment fidelity, Behaviour change, Physiotherapy, Physical activity, Exercise",
author = "Orlagh O’Shea and Rosemary McCormick and Judy Bradley and Brenda O’Neill",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/10833196.2016.1261237",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "207--214",
journal = "Physical Therapy Reviews",
issn = "1083-3196",
number = "3-6",

}

Fidelity review: A scoping review of the methods used to evaluate treatment fidelity in behavioural change interventions. / O’Shea, Orlagh; McCormick, Rosemary; Bradley, Judy; O’Neill, Brenda.

In: Physical Therapy Reviews, Vol. 21, No. 3-6, 20.12.2016, p. 207-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fidelity review: A scoping review of the methods used to evaluate treatment fidelity in behavioural change interventions

AU - O’Shea, Orlagh

AU - McCormick, Rosemary

AU - Bradley, Judy

AU - O’Neill, Brenda

PY - 2016/12/20

Y1 - 2016/12/20

N2 - Objectives: To identify the definitions used for treatment fidelity in the behaviour change literature and to explore the extent to which the assessment of fidelity has been reported according to the five domains by Bellg et al.Methods: Three databases (Scopus, Medline Ovid and CINAHL) were searched. Results were limited to studies published between 2012 and 2015. Definitions/summaries of treatment fidelity used were recorded. Methods for assessing/monitoring treatment fidelity were extracted, summarised and categorised according to the five domains.Results: Sixty-five papers were included for analysis. A definition of treatment fidelity was provided by n = 34 studies; n = 9 defined fidelity according to Bellg et al. In the context of treatment fidelity, n = 9 (13.8%) reported on study design; n = 22 (33.8%) reported on an element of training of providers; n = 59 (90.7%) papers reported on delivery of treatment; n = 13 (20%) reported on receipt of treatment; and n = 10 (15.3%) reported on enactment of treatment skills.Conclusion: The definitions of treatment fidelity in the literature and the extent to which it has been reported were limited. Delivery of treatment was the most frequently reported component of treatment fidelity but other important aspects were poorly reported. The potential consequence of this is that translation of research interventions into clinical practice may not be optimised.

AB - Objectives: To identify the definitions used for treatment fidelity in the behaviour change literature and to explore the extent to which the assessment of fidelity has been reported according to the five domains by Bellg et al.Methods: Three databases (Scopus, Medline Ovid and CINAHL) were searched. Results were limited to studies published between 2012 and 2015. Definitions/summaries of treatment fidelity used were recorded. Methods for assessing/monitoring treatment fidelity were extracted, summarised and categorised according to the five domains.Results: Sixty-five papers were included for analysis. A definition of treatment fidelity was provided by n = 34 studies; n = 9 defined fidelity according to Bellg et al. In the context of treatment fidelity, n = 9 (13.8%) reported on study design; n = 22 (33.8%) reported on an element of training of providers; n = 59 (90.7%) papers reported on delivery of treatment; n = 13 (20%) reported on receipt of treatment; and n = 10 (15.3%) reported on enactment of treatment skills.Conclusion: The definitions of treatment fidelity in the literature and the extent to which it has been reported were limited. Delivery of treatment was the most frequently reported component of treatment fidelity but other important aspects were poorly reported. The potential consequence of this is that translation of research interventions into clinical practice may not be optimised.

KW - Treatment fidelity

KW - Behaviour change

KW - Physiotherapy

KW - Physical activity

KW - Exercise

U2 - 10.1080/10833196.2016.1261237

DO - 10.1080/10833196.2016.1261237

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 207

EP - 214

JO - Physical Therapy Reviews

T2 - Physical Therapy Reviews

JF - Physical Therapy Reviews

SN - 1083-3196

IS - 3-6

ER -