Femtosecond LASIK versus conductive keratoplasty to obtainmonovision in presbyopic emmetropes

MG Ayoubi; A Leccisotti; Victoria McGilligan; EA Goodall; Tara Moore

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.035

Femtosecond LASIK versus conductive keratoplasty to obtainmonovision in presbyopic emmetropes

MG Ayoubi, A Leccisotti, Victoria McGilligan, EA Goodall, Tara Moore

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcome, complications and patient satisfaction of IntralaseLASIK (IL) treatment and conductive keratoplasty (CK) to obtain monovision by treating thenondominant eye in presbyopic emmetropes.SETTING: Reading and Southampton Optimax Laser Eye Clinics, UK.METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive, single-surgeon comparative study of presbyopicemmetropes treated with either IL or CK to achieve monovision by targeting -1.5 dioptre (D)myopia in the non-dominant eye after successful monovision contact lens trial. Thirty-twopatients were treated using CK and 32 patients were treated with IL. The CK treatments were performed with the View Point CK system using the light touch technique. The IL wasperformed using Intralase FS/FS30 and Nidek EC-5000 platform with OPDCAT wavefronttreatment.RESULTS: Spherical Equivalent (SE) at 12 months post procedure was -1.63±0.68 D in theIL group and -0.97±0.82 D in the CK group (p

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	997-1002
Journal	Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume	36
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.035
Publication status	Published (in print/issue) - 1 Jun 2010

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.035

Cite this

@article{cf37c2eb6b174d1985ac46fb6210e5da,

title = "Femtosecond LASIK versus conductive keratoplasty to obtainmonovision in presbyopic emmetropes",

abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare visual outcome, complications and patient satisfaction of IntralaseLASIK (IL) treatment and conductive keratoplasty (CK) to obtain monovision by treating thenondominant eye in presbyopic emmetropes.SETTING: Reading and Southampton Optimax Laser Eye Clinics, UK.METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive, single-surgeon comparative study of presbyopicemmetropes treated with either IL or CK to achieve monovision by targeting -1.5 dioptre (D)myopia in the non-dominant eye after successful monovision contact lens trial. Thirty-twopatients were treated using CK and 32 patients were treated with IL. The CK treatments were performed with the View Point CK system using the light touch technique. The IL wasperformed using Intralase FS/FS30 and Nidek EC-5000 platform with OPDCAT wavefronttreatment.RESULTS: Spherical Equivalent (SE) at 12 months post procedure was -1.63±0.68 D in theIL group and -0.97±0.82 D in the CK group (p",

author = "MG Ayoubi and A Leccisotti and Victoria McGilligan and EA Goodall and Tara Moore",

year = "2010",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.035",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "997--1002",

journal = "Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery",

issn = "0886-3350",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Femtosecond LASIK versus conductive keratoplasty to obtainmonovision in presbyopic emmetropes

AU - Ayoubi, MG

AU - Leccisotti, A

AU - McGilligan, Victoria

AU - Goodall, EA

AU - Moore, Tara

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare visual outcome, complications and patient satisfaction of IntralaseLASIK (IL) treatment and conductive keratoplasty (CK) to obtain monovision by treating thenondominant eye in presbyopic emmetropes.SETTING: Reading and Southampton Optimax Laser Eye Clinics, UK.METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive, single-surgeon comparative study of presbyopicemmetropes treated with either IL or CK to achieve monovision by targeting -1.5 dioptre (D)myopia in the non-dominant eye after successful monovision contact lens trial. Thirty-twopatients were treated using CK and 32 patients were treated with IL. The CK treatments were performed with the View Point CK system using the light touch technique. The IL wasperformed using Intralase FS/FS30 and Nidek EC-5000 platform with OPDCAT wavefronttreatment.RESULTS: Spherical Equivalent (SE) at 12 months post procedure was -1.63±0.68 D in theIL group and -0.97±0.82 D in the CK group (p

AB - PURPOSE: To compare visual outcome, complications and patient satisfaction of IntralaseLASIK (IL) treatment and conductive keratoplasty (CK) to obtain monovision by treating thenondominant eye in presbyopic emmetropes.SETTING: Reading and Southampton Optimax Laser Eye Clinics, UK.METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive, single-surgeon comparative study of presbyopicemmetropes treated with either IL or CK to achieve monovision by targeting -1.5 dioptre (D)myopia in the non-dominant eye after successful monovision contact lens trial. Thirty-twopatients were treated using CK and 32 patients were treated with IL. The CK treatments were performed with the View Point CK system using the light touch technique. The IL wasperformed using Intralase FS/FS30 and Nidek EC-5000 platform with OPDCAT wavefronttreatment.RESULTS: Spherical Equivalent (SE) at 12 months post procedure was -1.63±0.68 D in theIL group and -0.97±0.82 D in the CK group (p

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.035

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.035

M3 - Article

SN - 0886-3350

VL - 36

SP - 997

EP - 1002

JO - Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery

IS - 6

ER -

Femtosecond LASIK versus conductive keratoplasty to obtainmonovision in presbyopic emmetropes

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this