Femtosecond LASIK versus conductive keratoplasty to obtainmonovision in presbyopic emmetropes

MG Ayoubi, A Leccisotti, Victoria McGilligan, EA Goodall, Tara Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcome, complications and patient satisfaction of IntralaseLASIK (IL) treatment and conductive keratoplasty (CK) to obtain monovision by treating thenondominant eye in presbyopic emmetropes.SETTING: Reading and Southampton Optimax Laser Eye Clinics, UK.METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive, single-surgeon comparative study of presbyopicemmetropes treated with either IL or CK to achieve monovision by targeting -1.5 dioptre (D)myopia in the non-dominant eye after successful monovision contact lens trial. Thirty-twopatients were treated using CK and 32 patients were treated with IL. The CK treatments were performed with the View Point CK system using the light touch technique. The IL wasperformed using Intralase FS/FS30 and Nidek EC-5000 platform with OPDCAT wavefronttreatment.RESULTS: Spherical Equivalent (SE) at 12 months post procedure was -1.63±0.68 D in theIL group and -0.97±0.82 D in the CK group (p
LanguageEnglish
Pages997-1002
JournalJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Laser In Situ Keratomileusis
Corneal Transplantation
Contact Lenses
Myopia
Touch
Patient Satisfaction
Tryptophan
Reading
Lasers
Therapeutics

Cite this

@article{cf37c2eb6b174d1985ac46fb6210e5da,
title = "Femtosecond LASIK versus conductive keratoplasty to obtainmonovision in presbyopic emmetropes",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To compare visual outcome, complications and patient satisfaction of IntralaseLASIK (IL) treatment and conductive keratoplasty (CK) to obtain monovision by treating thenondominant eye in presbyopic emmetropes.SETTING: Reading and Southampton Optimax Laser Eye Clinics, UK.METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive, single-surgeon comparative study of presbyopicemmetropes treated with either IL or CK to achieve monovision by targeting -1.5 dioptre (D)myopia in the non-dominant eye after successful monovision contact lens trial. Thirty-twopatients were treated using CK and 32 patients were treated with IL. The CK treatments were performed with the View Point CK system using the light touch technique. The IL wasperformed using Intralase FS/FS30 and Nidek EC-5000 platform with OPDCAT wavefronttreatment.RESULTS: Spherical Equivalent (SE) at 12 months post procedure was -1.63±0.68 D in theIL group and -0.97±0.82 D in the CK group (p",
author = "MG Ayoubi and A Leccisotti and Victoria McGilligan and EA Goodall and Tara Moore",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.035",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "997--1002",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Femtosecond LASIK versus conductive keratoplasty to obtainmonovision in presbyopic emmetropes. / Ayoubi, MG; Leccisotti, A; McGilligan, Victoria; Goodall, EA; Moore, Tara.

In: Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.06.2010, p. 997-1002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Femtosecond LASIK versus conductive keratoplasty to obtainmonovision in presbyopic emmetropes

AU - Ayoubi, MG

AU - Leccisotti, A

AU - McGilligan, Victoria

AU - Goodall, EA

AU - Moore, Tara

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To compare visual outcome, complications and patient satisfaction of IntralaseLASIK (IL) treatment and conductive keratoplasty (CK) to obtain monovision by treating thenondominant eye in presbyopic emmetropes.SETTING: Reading and Southampton Optimax Laser Eye Clinics, UK.METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive, single-surgeon comparative study of presbyopicemmetropes treated with either IL or CK to achieve monovision by targeting -1.5 dioptre (D)myopia in the non-dominant eye after successful monovision contact lens trial. Thirty-twopatients were treated using CK and 32 patients were treated with IL. The CK treatments were performed with the View Point CK system using the light touch technique. The IL wasperformed using Intralase FS/FS30 and Nidek EC-5000 platform with OPDCAT wavefronttreatment.RESULTS: Spherical Equivalent (SE) at 12 months post procedure was -1.63±0.68 D in theIL group and -0.97±0.82 D in the CK group (p

AB - PURPOSE: To compare visual outcome, complications and patient satisfaction of IntralaseLASIK (IL) treatment and conductive keratoplasty (CK) to obtain monovision by treating thenondominant eye in presbyopic emmetropes.SETTING: Reading and Southampton Optimax Laser Eye Clinics, UK.METHODS: Retrospective, consecutive, single-surgeon comparative study of presbyopicemmetropes treated with either IL or CK to achieve monovision by targeting -1.5 dioptre (D)myopia in the non-dominant eye after successful monovision contact lens trial. Thirty-twopatients were treated using CK and 32 patients were treated with IL. The CK treatments were performed with the View Point CK system using the light touch technique. The IL wasperformed using Intralase FS/FS30 and Nidek EC-5000 platform with OPDCAT wavefronttreatment.RESULTS: Spherical Equivalent (SE) at 12 months post procedure was -1.63±0.68 D in theIL group and -0.97±0.82 D in the CK group (p

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.035

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.035

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 997

EP - 1002

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

T2 - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 6

ER -